• ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There is no male loneliness epidemic; there is a loneliness epidemic. They have been talking about it since at least 2020 and it predates the pandemic. Anyone calling it a male loneliness epidemic is absolutely engagement farming. The entire manosphere is a rage-bait-engagement-farming scam.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not just engagement. Back when it was just a loneliness epidemic, there were talks of maybe bringing back third places, or changing society to help. Then it became a male epidemic, and suddenly it was someone else’s problem, it’s an individual issue, no need to make a cause of it.

  • FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is actually a really fucking eye opening post, assuming they’re not lying. I personally never thought there was a “virginity epidemic” among my peers, lol.

    It seems like people have gotten less cliquey about virginity since then, so maybe it is a good lie?

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      I wanted to check if anon was lying, but the only recent numbers I found are on what looks like a website of a conservative think tank with a pronatalist/marriage ideological mission (a little creepy imo). It does reference a cdc survey that seems real as the data source but still a bit sus to me though too much effort to reproduce their work. I’m pretty sure it’s anon’s source of information since it also covers ages 22-34 and they chose that range deliberately:

      We focus here on males and females ages 22-34 because this is the key window in which people tend to marry and start families

      And the other numbers that I looked at seem to match up. If I’m being paranoid I’d wonder if anon is actually their intern doing social media propaganda campaigns.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 minutes ago

      In fact sex being used as the indicator is actually a clue to one of the largest contributors. There’s a very wide reaching assumption that men should get most of their emotional support from their female partner. This is often very stressful to the female partner and is a fragile way to meet a basic need; if she gets sick or dies he’s probably not far behind her. Men need to learn how to compliment and hug each other platonically. It’s 2026 and it’s for their own good ffs. I keep giving my male patients brochures for men’s support groups and I really hope at least some of them are actually going.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Having a ton of sex doesn’t equal not lonely either.

      Like Barney from HIMYM, or Charlie Sheen in 2.5 men.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No, I’m pretty sure that every man who has had sex at least once in their life turned out to be a top bloke

  • FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    To me, the Bubonic plague will always be “the epidemic”, but COVID can still be called the pandemic since it happened all over the world at the same time, which makes it more pandemic than the Bubonic Plague

    Edit: “didn’t even read the greentext before I started yapping about something” award