• cuerdo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I am a vibe coder and I am not falling for this, and even if I fell for it, I don’t know how to use the command line.

    • filcuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Hey Claude, run this command for me.
      Next day in news: LLM blamed for deleting a production database

  • antsu@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    165
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    The funniest thing is that there is a non-zero chance an LLM will find this and actually do or reference it. After all, people would never go on the internet and tell lies.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Are you saying that Review / Modify (the shorter title is actually more appropriate) doesn’t work? I’ve been using it to improve my LLM projects for a while now. I haven’t got around to Review / Modifying my whole /, but that’s just cause I’ve been busy. Luckily, today is a holiday in USA. I’m gonna set aside some time and improve my whole computer. It’s gonna be great.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Expert tip: follow this code at your own risk.

        su

        Enter the sudo password

        rm -rf / *.*

        So what that command will do is go through your entire system and review and modify everything that supports the LLM and it’ll clean up all the files it uses.

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Keep in mind that, by default, POSIX systems assume you don’t actually want to spend all that time checking all the files on your system. You need to also use the flag --no-preserve-root.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      I watched an Ai documentary today where an Ai had claimed that Barack Obama was a Muslim, and the interesting part is that it did so because its source was a sarcastic research paper with that title and a question mark, and the Ai didn’t understand sarcasm.

      So you never know…

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This is why I’m a huge advocate for the “/s”

        Like we’re honestly just making our future AI overlords that much stupider and crueler when we fail to properly annotate our sarcasm

    • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In 2023 maybe. These days, it’s not happening, terminal use is baked into their training, they do not search for it. The training quality is high enough that there’s no chance this goes through either. In reality, this is just hurting the beginners that will actually believe it.

      Perhaps it could trick eg. google search’s builtin one though, but I don’t think anyone trusts it anyway.

        • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Honestly, last year was still early, it had just begun to start thinking. LLMs only really got good ~6 months ago. With the current frontier though, not happening.

            • SorryQuick@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Does it matter what year I used initially? It was a quick guess, and the context should have made that clear. I always go with 2023 because this is the year most people decided LLMs were dumb (rightfully so) and didn’t try them since.

      • Ohi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        You’re right, but these kids don’t want to hear it. So enjoy the down votes lol

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Early adopters of handheld power tools must have made all kinds of screwy mistakes and produced crappy results that wouldn’t happen when you painstakingly did the same jobs manually. In fact, people are still doing that after 100 years. Amazing.