• DarkSirrush@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    The fact that this had to be covered in court is absolutely insane, considering ending someone’s employment due to maternity leave isn’t legal in Canada.

    The company that laid someone off right after their return should be fined and required to pay a generous severance, not to mention EI should definitely be applicable since not only did the employee not quit, they were let go through no fault of their own.

    • festus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The article doesn’t say if the women were laid off because of maternity leave, only that they were laid off around that time. We don’t know if anything illegal happened - for all we know one of the employers may have closed an entire branch office or something.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean it kind of makes sense. They don’t have the hours built up to qualify for EI. Is it right I don’t know the company should be forced to pay a severance though.

  • rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    the amount of hoops someone who needs EI has to go through to get it in this country is mind boggling. It’s easier to get the pennies you get from Ontario Works in Ontario than it is to get EI and you pay directly into EI. and BOTH will battle with you to get you off them.

    it’s shameful that this country will fight it’s citizens tooth and nail to prevent assisting them in their time of need.

    • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I had no problem getting EI for the 10 months I was unemployed. The company went “bankrupt”. No notice, no severance, but the ~1200 every 2 weeks was helpful.