• rtxn@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 hours ago

    In my eyes, it’s the same deal as conservatives coping with the changing world. There is a version where they just shut up and let the rest of the tech landscape improve while they happily stick to the X they know (X.org or even XLibre).

      • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Unless I’m terribly misunderstanding the word’s meaning (or anglophones once again redefined a word to reflect their current sensibilities), “conservative” doesn’t automatically imply politics, just that someone is resistant to new ideas. A person who only listens to music produced before the 20th century and goes into a rage when video game music composers are mentioned is a conservative, but not in terms of political views.

      • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Getting left behind is the natural and inevitable consequence of obsolescence.

          • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Yes, the people who refuse to either upgrade to Win11-compatible hardware or move to an OS compatible with their existing hardware will eventually get left behind. Both in terms of security and compatibility. It’s happened many times, from the fall of AGP in favour of PCIE, to every time Intel inroduced a new CPU socket. X11 is the next.