• artifex@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    There are groups of designers who have the job of making symbols and systems that can survive for an extremely long time. One of their tasks was to design “signage” that might let generations thousands of years in the future not go poking around in nuclear waste yards. But the more crazy deadly and dangerous you make an artifact look, the more those future scientists are going to want to get into them.

    This is not a place of honor

      • Thunderbird4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This one looks cool, and I think that’s its biggest problem. It’s clearly a massive, man-made structure with no obvious purpose, yet with striking visual impact. To the hypothetical future civilization that is unaware of the dangerous nuclear waste, it basically begs to be investigated.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Yeah iirc the absolute best solution proposed was to not put any markings at all and bury it deep enough that any future civilization advanced enough to get to it will probably realize what it is long before they actually get to it.

    • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I watched a documentary about that: Into Eternity

      What I thought was interesting about the film was the balance between entertaining a fantastical vision of some future explorer stumbling across the radioactive site, and the mundanity of most of the actual work.

      One of the engineers said something like: “When we seal this up with so much concrete, there’s no way you’re getting in here without machinery. We should be more concerned about a future civilization that comes back here for radioactive materials when they’ve exhausted all other natural sources”

      And then there’s a whole section of the film about rules-lawyering the storage site. The dump was chartered by the Finish government to seal waste “for all time”, and the engineers were mad that nothing is truly permanent.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I was thinking about this and their thinking was way too complicated. The symbol you need is bones. Bones are always associated with death and decay because after death, bones are the thing that’s left.

      And yes I know they thought of it but I think their dismissal of it is wrong. Their counter argument that it was once a symbol of something else by some culture, therefore. But again by its very nature it’s associated with death. Any society capable of this excavation is also capable of thinking “hmm what did they mean? outside of our own culture of course” and will quickly figure out it’s bad.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        The symbol you need is bones. Bones are always associated with death and decay because after death, bones are the thing that’s left.

        I think the only way to get it taken seriously is to include depictions of the site and depictions of what radiation sickness looks like.

        Make like a 100 page comic that starts with someone opening a cask and removing a fuel element, then dying days later, the element leaving contamination, which kills someone else months later, causes birth defects, etc until it’s returned.

        You’re not going to scare a society into never investigating something, but you might be able to convince them to put it back and bury it again after they realize the predictions are accurate.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, Carl Sagan was like “skull and crossbones”

        But of course everyone else wanted to over-engineer it, so you get proposed solutions like encoding messages in the DNA of plants, and color-changing cats with an accompanying viral song that no one’s ever heard of twelve years later… 🤦‍♀️

        Like, guys, if people today can’t even figure out what it means, then it’s not a universal and enduring message.

        And then some of the suggestions would only serve to make it a glaringly obvious archaeological dig site.

        Skull and crossbones is about as universal as you can get. Maybe some atomic diagrams and radiation symbols, and written warnings in as many languages as possible, just in case people still understand them. And a giant slab that someone could only drill through deliberately, requiring heavy equipment.

        I can’t believe these were supposedly some of the smartest people in the world, and yet they made the mistakes of assuming that future civilizations would be hyperintelligent and thoroughly inquisitive, while also not understanding any symbols from our era and being likely to avoid areas designed to seem ominous. As if egyptologists today respect the warnings on ancient tombs.

        And yet they overlooked the skull and crossbones because it seemed too obvious. The whole point is that it’s supposed to be obvious!!!

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Atomic diagrams would be good for advanced societies, but societies in the bronze age or middle age advancment are the ones that we have to worry about. They won’t understand atomic phyiscs but they are capable of excavation. Any fancy symbols might just intrigue them.

          I think they underestimated the intelligence of possible future societies. Any society advanced enough to excavate this will be intelligent enough to ask “what does this symbol logically mean”. They won’t be limited to the ‘bad-vibes’ that the current ideas are heavy on (language aside).

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            They were really counting on a middle-age level of advancement when they suggested making a new religion with a priesthood and its own mythology…

      • artifex@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Take a scull-and-crossbones. It might be taken to mean danger or poison. Or it might be taken to mean pirates or treasure. And if the future explorers did connect it with danger or poison, why wouldn’t they also just think it was maybe a superstition meant to keep outsiders from getting “the good stuff,” like the curses that were sealed into ancient Egyptian tombs?

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Why did pirates use it? Because it’s “give us your shit or you die.”

          I think your fear is more likely with the current ominous but doesn’t tell you why message (if the language part is lost).

      • Rusty@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There was a conference about this and Carl Sagan was invited, but couldn’t come. He sent a letter suggesting to do just that - skull and bones symbol.

    • alteredraccoon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Man this would be such a killer start or premise for a sci fi book

      This place is a message… and part of a system of messages… pay attention to it!

      Sending this message was important to us. We considered ourselves to be a powerful culture. This place is not a place of honor… no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here… nothing valued is here.

      What is here was dangerous and repulsive to us. This message is a warning about danger. The danger is in a particular location… it increases towards a center… the center of danger is here… of a particular size and shape, and below us.

      The danger is still present, in your time, as it was in ours.

      The danger is to the body, and it can kill. The form of the danger is an emanation of energy.

      The danger is unleashed only if you substantially disturb this place physically. This place is best shunned and left uninhabited.