• Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Just because they’ve trained you to believe you need the latest 2nm chips (which is conveniently their highest margin product) doesn’t mean you really need them.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        13 hours ago

        So personal computers of year 1999 gave their users that feeling of magic that can still be felt from media of that time, and state-of-the-art chips were being produced in fabs located not only on Taiwan, but USA, Israel, elsewhere.

        Personal computers of today don’t give any feeling of magic to most their users, you have to look for it.

        Yet considering a standard still above what you realistically need is somehow lowering your standards.

        In year 2006 they’d say about computers how many books you can fit into this or that volume of memory, or which calculations you can perform, sometimes, to give you perspective. They don’t do that now, because then you’d be depressed how many resources you are using for something more vulgar than porn.

        It’s just sad.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I agree. Most people are spoiled little lazy ass brats now. Im so glad i wasn’t born any later so I can actually appreciate what we have.

          At the same time, fuck these billionaire accelerstioniats for trying to destroy earth while taking what little enjoyment away we can have.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        15 hours ago

        “I’m just saying they don’t need to have 30 dolls. They can have three. They don’t need to have 250 pencils. They can have five.”

          • My point is: Just because someone isn’t “suffering as much as others” doesn’t mean the stuff they go through (like the fears of ICE for example) aren’t valid.

            Both points are true:

            1. You can recognize that, yes you have it better than others.

            BUT ALSO:

            1. It doesn’t mean you should accept status quo forever.

            Because accepting status quo is like saying, “why are you complaining about trump? at least you aren’t in taliban afghanistan or north korea”

          • lobut@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            16 hours ago

            If you’re upset with my feedback, adjust your expectations.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That’s exactly the point. I’m not upset because I don’t expect people online to have any sort of sense. I adjusted that expectation long ago and I’m much happier for it.

              But you seem to be assuming that I’m saying everyone should just drop their expectations and be happy. That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that suffering is caused by desire. So if you can reduce your desire, you can reduce your suffering.

              But many times you can’t, or shouldn’t, reduce your desire. I won’t ever desire to be okay with what’s happening in my country, for example. I choose to be unhappy with it.

              So choose to be fucking unhappy. It’s okay to be unhappy. I’m not going to judge you for it.

              • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                What’s the difference between that and suppressing your true feelings? From my perspective, it just seems like a strategy for bottling up what you actually feel rather than letting your true feelings out. On the surface at least, it sounds like that’s a recipe for it blowing up at some point in a much worse way?

    • zen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If we were talking about stuff like healthcare, food, housing, electricity, clean water, public transit, or access to information, I’d be on the same page.

      But this is a luxury hobby. And with luxury hobbies, there’s usually some flexibility. You don’t need a high-end PC to play games. You can run plenty on a lower-end setup, try different genres, or even step away from PC gaming altogether.

      You could have friends over for a tabletop game, go for a run, hit the gym, or try something like rock climbing. There are lots of ways to spend your time without needing top-tier gear