• A lot of the libcamera work done on Raspberry Pi boards is going towards improving the camera support on linux phones like the PinePhone, which is great!

        Aside from that, sadly a lot of people (including myself) are kind of fed up with Raspberry Pi, after they essentially abandoned their mission during Covid to please corporations, and are preparing to go public despite being a “charity”. Broadcom, their SoC supplier, also has left a sour taste in my mouth after their purchase and mass layoffs at VMWare.

        If they created a phone it would likely end up being scalped to death, and maybe pretty pricey compared to a PinePhone

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Aside from that, sadly a lot of people (including myself) are kind of fed up with Raspberry Pi, after they essentially abandoned their mission during Covid to please corporations

          Just out of curiosity, could you state what you think their mission was?

          (I’m just wondering if anybody even remembers their original original mission.)

          • AFAIK their original mission was along the lines of making computers accessible at a low price point, particularly targeting the education sector in parts of the world where computers weren’t very accessible or affordable. Comparable to the OLPC, but not on an individual basis

            I could be wrong though

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    it’s a fun toy, not super useful but probably fun to tinker with
    I’ve done some ungodly stuff to my android phones (even non-rooted ones, I’m totally abusing them) and I can’t even imagine all the possibilities with a proper linux distro. Having a pocket pc with a full arm64 linux sounds awesome

  • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Linux phones will need to run established Android apps to get users, devs won’t move where there is no users, users won’t move there if there aren’t apps. It’s almost cyclical

    Right now we’re working with people who are exceptions to this, users who want to experiment and devs who don’t care about money.

    • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Waydroid runs decently on the pinephone. On a phone with better specs, it might be downright usable for proprietary apps.

      Potentially a proton-style layer could really ease transition, like on the steamdeck

      • ramjambamalam@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        BlackBerry 10 was actually a pretty slick OS that supported Android apps and you could even side-load Google Play services.

    • someguy3@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Progressive Web Apps. Web programs broke the need for Microsoft Windows.

    • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Agreed. Classic story that has been repeated several times over the years. Ecosystem is everything.

      Microsoft’s Windows phones were fantastic. They had super nice hardware, high refresh rate screens, better cameras on their flagship models than iPhones at the time.

      They were sleek, fast, the Windows tile UI actually worked great on a phone touchscreen. But it didn’t matter to most consumers because they didn’t have apps. MS had their own business apps…and that was about it. Didn’t matter that every other aspect of the phones were great, people couldn’t do what they wanted to on the Windows phones, so they didn’t buy them.

      I would love to see something like Proton but for .apks instead of Windows executables. If it were as easy to install and run android apps on a mobile Linux OS as it is now to install and play Windows games on Linux, we would be in a great place to see a proper Linux phone.

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        GNU/Linux is not aimed at people who want the most features. It’s made for people who value freedom above everything else.

        I would love to see something like Proton but for .apks instead of Windows executables. If it were as easy to install and run android apps on a mobile Linux OS as it is now to install and play Windows games on Linux, we would be in a great place to see a proper Linux phone.

        You mean Waydroid? I’ve read that it works pretty well.

      • CalcProgrammer1@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        We have Waydroid which is close enough. It needs some quality of life improvements for better integration with the native Linux ecosystem but it runs Android apps just fine on Linux phones.

  • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Everyone saying Android is completely missing the point. I mean yeah, it runs the linux kernel, but i feel like most of yall wouldn’t call ChromeOS linux on the other hand.

    The obvious connotations are privacy, choice, wayland/x11 support, a useful terminal, a rich foss ecosystem, and arch btw.

    • genie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’d agree with you in the context of standard (google) android.

      One caveat that I’d like to highlight, though, is that for me GrapheneOS and F-Droid handily achieve the privacy and rich FOSS ecosystem parts. Useful terminal depends on your definition :) but for my use case Termux fills the void.

      It doesn’t feel like Linux (you can’t even use Wifi and Ethernet at the same time for crying out loud) but for a relatively cheap low-power device, I like the flexibility.

      It’s far enough from being a foot gun that I can give a Pixel 5 with GrapheneOS and some F-Droid apps to my grandmother and know she’ll have no problems. Balancing that with having enough extensibility to scratch the itch for 99% of tinkerers is a feat to appreciate in my view.

  • Fartfrenzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve been daily driving Ubuntu Touch on the Fairphone 4 for over a year. I love it, even if some features are lacking. Calling and text is stable, but unfortunately Volte support is still missing. Waydroid is also working great.

  • Abnorc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I appreciate the people who daily drive pinephones. They are paving the way for when they’ll be viable alternatives for the masses. (Or verifying that they won’t be, we’ll see.)

  • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Between October 2018 to April 2023 I used as my daily drivers a series of phones (OnePlus One, Meizu Pro 5, Volla Phone, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro) all flashed to running Ubuntu Touch. During this time UT (Ubuntu Touch) was less developed than it is now, in that Waydroid (which allows using some Android apps over a Lineage OS container that boots on top of UT) did not yet exist, and Libertine (which allows some Linux desktop apps built for Ubuntu arm64 deb to be installed) was not as functional. And yet is still worked great for my modest needs (e.g. I don’t do banking, or any kind of more advanced gaming, on my phones).

    The reason I reverted last year to de-googled Android (“vanilla” Bliss ROM on a Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro) is that being in the USA, the carriers here have closed or are closing down all their 3G/2G networks, and requiring VoLTE for phone calls. While UT supports LTE for mobile data without a problem, given that VoLTE is a proprietary closed protocol with implementation varying between carrier, oem and device, the only device which UT currently has VoLTE support for (and which is still shaky) is the PinePhone Pro.

    Anyhoo - the UT dev community is pretty small, but definitely dedicated, and still offers some promise into the future for a nice privacy respecting alternative OS for mobile devices and tablets. Hopefully at some point VoLTE, and a few other issues gets figured out for it so I can return to using it for my daily driver - in the meantime I’ve got it on a OnePlus 5t as a secondary device, and on a Lenovo x306f 10" tablet.

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      the only device which Ubuntu Touch currently has VoLTE support for (and which is still shaky) is the PinePhone Pro.

      I’m incredulous that this is the case. You’re probably right but there’s no way in hell I’m using a phone restricted to 2g or 3g.

      • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am talking about VoLTE (Voice over LTE) which is the protocol just for making phone calls over 4g networks - NOT 4g/LTE mobile data! Ubuntu Touch has worked well with 4g/LTE mobile data for 10 years now.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      The loss of Dalton Durst from that team from burnout was a big hit. They’ve been doing work on it but I haven’t seen anything approaching the output they had when he was heading it up.

      • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Dalton is an amazing and very cool guy, and when he left it was indeed a big hit to dev speed at first, but recently a few super smart and dedicated guys have been able to do a big jump in updating the base from 16.04 to 20.04 (which involved moving from upstart to systemd) and they are getting close to rebasing to 24.04 (target for this is this June in fact). Plus Waydroid support has gotten really good in the time since Dalton moved on, and snap support is getting worked on now as well.

  • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Okay look I get what we’re trying to say here but would it be problematic if I pointed out that Android is also running Linux?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      See, this is why, yet again, Stallman was right: insisting on “GNU/Linux” is necessary in order to disambiguate between the fully-Free Software OS and bastardized half-proprietary stuff like Android.

    • SuperSynthia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a valid point, but unfortunately your non bullshit options are limited to replacing the OS with something like Graphene or Lineage.

      The powers that be REALLY want your data.

      • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        GNU is a recursive acronym for “GNU’s Not Unix!”,[6][12] chosen because GNU’s design is Unix-like, but differs from Unix by being free software and containing no Unix code.[6][13][14] Stallman chose the name by using various plays on words, including the song The Gnu.[4]: 45:30

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU