• spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The tech industry will get to keep refunds of the of tariffs they’ve collected AND will make more money automating the distribution of those refunds to themselves.

    Sounds like the tech industry is in tariff heaven.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    “$700 million in interest is added to the final bill every month that the government delays tariff refunds, or around $23 million per day.”

    It’s insane that the American tax payers paid more for products, and now they get to pay interest on their illegal payments, and all of that money goes into the coffers of private companies — who will no doubt use it to issue special dividends to their investors and bonuses to their execs.

    Any sane administration would be promptly removed and this would be a chain around their neck for a generation.

    • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Alright, well the only way they are getting promptly removed is if average Americans all decide they need to go to DC to physically do it.

  • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have a question. The government is repaying companies that paid the tariffs. But the companies passed the cost of the tariffs on to the consumers. Do the consumers get refunded for their tariff applicable purchases? Like. Not the whole thing obvious, but the portion that covered the tariffs?

    • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      14 hours ago

      What do you think lol? Cards Against Humanity is sending wee little checks out if you email them, but it’s both a marketing stunt and the only incidence I’ve heard of

      • deliriousdreams@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I think it’s important to highlight it because these companies likely will pocket the refunds and give their consumers nothing. I doubt that prices will even fall in the wake of this to pre tariff prices.

        Which means even in fucking it up and enacting tariffs that were illegal it still benefitted businesses instead of consumers when what that idiot claimed at the start is that the American people would benefit and even see lower prices.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Stick to your old hardware and wait for the shitstorm to pass. The big tech deserve to fail.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The big tech doesn’t deserve to fail. a bail out, but will definitely be getting one.

      • Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Hot take: if your company needs a bailout it’s no longer a private company and belongs to people as a public service and is regulated as such.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          bailouts ought to come with leverage either as a loan/bond (at fed rates) or a capital investment. I agree! and then the company can either buy the government out or repay the loan. it strikes me as fair.

          now hear me out: that fund that the government owns? all those stocks and bonds?

          if you are an elected official, you gotta sell your stocks, your bonds, your etfs, everything. then you invest in the government fund. they’re gonna fuck around to boost those stocks anyways, so let’s have a set that we know.

          then make an ETF for us plebes that follows it that we can invest in if we want to follow their inside trading.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean… personally? I don’t feel like this is actually that much of a hot take. More of a verifiably good idea.

          • kiterios@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            The bailout is the government purchasing shares at about to go bankrupt prices. It’s a reasonable take that isn’t even really a change in the system.

            • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              See…that’s the kind of logic that gets people places!

              … unfortunately in the US the place it might get you is the gulag…

            • zikzak025@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              17 hours ago

              And yet the “free” market can’t be trusted to correct itself and fill the gaps if we allow a giant megacorp to fall.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 hours ago

              “Pay no attention to the [US government buying 10% of Intel] behind the curtain.”

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The content of the article does not match the title. It doesn’t actually talk specifically about the tech industry or claim that it is in particular difficulty.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Restraint’s probably not the perfect word,” but the president may start exhibiting “a little more contemplation and thoughtfulness,” Dolen suggested.

    I mean, theoretically, yes…