You’re not productive if you don’t use a lot of AI, says guy who makes all of his money selling AI hardware

  • moustachio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 minutes ago

    It’s amazing they can just make these claims without literally any evidence and no major “media” organization asks for it. They are just propaganda for these companies.

  • recked_wralph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Wouldn’t an AI researcher naturally find generative AI disadvantageous because they are attempting to develop novel tools which could not exist in the training set in the first place?

    • 8oow3291d@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Even novel solutions are usually built out of smaller common building blocks. E.g. many novel solutions surely use a database. You can make the LLM help you set up and use the database, that your novel solution uses.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Let me translate this for you, “My bonus depends on you showing our massive investment wasn’t a waste so I’m holding your jobs hostage until you make up busy work to pretend it was worthwhile.”

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 hours ago

    CEO suggests raising employee costs by fifty percent and is immediately fired.

    Sorry, we don’t live in a sane world anymore.

  • nightchrome@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    14 hours ago

    They’ve all realized there’s no point in even bothering to hide the grift anymore. People don’t care.

  • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    It would take a great burden from my shoulders, if AI could wash my clothes, do the dishes, cook, and vacuum my apartment. Those are the things I don’t want to do. I like my job. I can do it myself. Yeah, sure, there are occasionally things that AI can do for me in my daily work, but it’s mostly stupid, repetitive shit. And then I have to review it, which sucks even harder.

    • worhui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      So I found it kind of sucks to have those daily life tasks removed. I worked in a place early in my career that had on site catered food, on site laundry, on site massage, shopping services (before Amazon prime) and lodging for excessive overtime .

      If it’s just leaving you more opportunity to work it sucks. I can’t be the only one who enjoys taking care of the daily life tasks Lê cleaning, shopping and cooking for myself. It’s what personalizes your life. When you do it for yourself, you decide what you eat and what you wear.

      It seems cool but it’s offered so you never stop working and your life is never really your own.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Sam Altman floated paying employees in chatGPT tokens, that surely their landlord will accept. The main motive would be being broke. Nvidia is not broke, but it is weird as fuck to be comparing it to salary, if it doesn’t segue into the OpenAI plan. The $500k salary example would seem to generate more tokens than you could have time to skim over in review.