You must log in or register to comment.
It eats.
It is thus the primordial consumer.
… kinda does bare a resemblance to what AM turns Ted into…
Has no organs
Looks inside…
…organs.
is there a poop hole?
There’s a hole
No but also yes
yeah, the mid-ventral butt opening
So from the wiki
The monophyly of Xenacoelomorpha soon became established, but its position as either a basal bilaterian clade or a deuterostome remained unresolved until 2016, when two new studies, with increased gene and taxon sampling, again placed Xenoturbella as the sister group of Acoelomorpha within Xenacoelomorpha, and placed Xenacoelomorpha as sister to Nephrozoa (Protostomia plus Deuterostomia), and therefore the basalmost bilaterian phylum<
Seems like “where on the tree of life” is “the first bilaterals” which makes sense. They seem very worm-like in bodyplan. Shit from the Pre-Cambrian can look pretty alien and have shaky relationships to more derived species.
It’s disturbing to me that so many people search for what something is used for or what’s the value or right to life a creature has. The point of life is to live. If you are successful you maybe make a child or split into a copy of yourself when you get enough food.
Purpose is something you accept for yourself. Imposing it on others is diabolically evil when they don’t have a thing to do with your clade. And still, it would be the case that a person would look at an animal and say “what’s the point of you?”
<3
utility has several virtues, but i agree that it’s not the end-all/be-all. strictly speaking the “point” of any living thing is to pass it’s genes by reproduction, but in a complex and evolving world there are lots of animals that have a “point” in existing. oysters filter water, worms enrich soil, birds spread seeds, bees pollinate flowers, there are primary decomposers and secondary decomposers and tertiary decomposers and some birds build nests in trees and squirrels hide nuts and, you get the picture?
then there are other animals that we have changed for their utility. cows, pigs, chickens, and sheep are delicious and they would not make up such a share of modern biomass if we didn’t industrialize their slaughter. in some cases the point of an animal is that we’re gonna eat it.
if you’re an emotion-forward person you might think “oh, no, that’s terrible!” and you’re allowed to feel that way but usually things are the way they are for a bunch of reasons. feelings are great but food security is better. utility also has a role to play in conservation: we’re having a great time with industry but if the earth suffers catastrophic ecological collapse, the whole party stops.
I also find that to be a weird question to consider, as though something must have a purpose to be worthy of existence
In that vein, what is the point of humans? To bring on the 6th mass extinction?
We’re really trying, aren’t we?
I think try is the wrong world, pretty sure we’ve succeeded, the question now is “Does anything survive?”
a fanciful answer i heard was that “humans are how the universe perceives itself,” and a person could be forgiven for thinking that the point of humans is to do science. closer to the ground, the point of humans seems to be to alter our surroundings to suit our society: kind of like ants. we build, we live, we reproduce, we spread. it’s not a good thing or a bad thing, it just is what it is.
It looks like they do get new openings on the surface that excrete eggs and sperm.
The universe is a chain of cause and effect, and the only way to interpret “a reason” for something without introducing artificial human constructs of morality, is “what caused it?”. The process of evolution caused this.
Would.
It truly has one hole, in that it eats, has a digestive sack, and then vomits the poop
Kinda like a 2 stroke engine. The fuel and the exhaust all just mix.
It’s gross, but I can’t see any reason this disqualifies it from being on the tree of life.
If the hole doesn’t go through, it is only a pocket, typographically identical to a plate.
Well we’re just doughnuts.
*topologically
(Typography is text font stuff)
maybe they meant
O
Meh. I’ll own my mistake. Silly autocorrect
vomits the poop
have had norovirus, know that feel
Why is the digestive sack not an organ?
Exist for no reason? All life has a purpose, and that is to poop. The excrement speaks for itself.
Time to wake up and go to work in the shit factory!
Poop is subsistence, Sex is persistence
It sounds like it doesn’t have a poop hole
Edit: oh, nevermind. “For food to enter and exit”
No clear reason? It’s because the thing can successfully make more of itself before dying. That’s literally it.
See also: ticks
No animal has reason to exist.
*nothing has
As an animal myself, I’d like to object.
Okay, we’re listening. First establish some framework of “reasons to exist” so we understand what that even means, and then tell us yours. Centuries of philosophy haven’t gotten past the first step and you probably won’t either, but I won’t stop you from trying. Okay, go.
Maybe i dont wanna share mt reasons ;((((
Okay but you could still do step 1 without revealing anything personal. Tell us: what even is a “reason to exist?”
exists for no clear reason
Sounds like Humans
Sounds like everything, if you’re leaning nihilist.
Nihilists! Fuck me! I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism Dude, at least it’s an ethos!
Nine year olds, man!
It also only has one hole, which, if you ask some topologists, is what humans have.
I thought most humans are 7 holes
Mouth, Anus, Nasal Passages (2), Occular passages (2), Aural passages (2) = 8. -1 for topology reasons (one “hole” is a divot, not a tube, and a divot is topologically equivalent to a smooth surface) = 7.
Math checks out. (EDIT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egEraZP9yXQ )
Well, there’s the one obvious one - mouth through to the anus, there may be more openings to that hole, but I don’t believe any of them go all the way through.
That changes the topology though. It does go all the way through a section which prevents it from reshaping into a straw/donut
Yes. I’m afraid I’m not a real topologist, so we’re at their mercy. Let us pray they don’t come up with new holes.
Donut be afraid my fellow fleshtube.
I’m afraid I’m not a real topologist
But you are topologically equivalent to one!
Two more out the nose
They go through the same hole as the mouth in the end, though. At least a part of them…
I think I said in another comment that I’m not an actual expert on this matter. So there may well be more holes in this theory, and person.
They go through the same hole as the mouth in the end, though.
Yes, but they’re distinct openings, which means we’re not topologically equivalent to a doughnut when you take them into account. Topological equivalence implies that you can transform one object into another without changing the number of openings. Classic example is a doughnut and a coffee mug (the handle of a coffee mug is the opening). A human would be equivalent to a doughnut with two holes poked through the side into the middle.
Return to donut.
If you really think about it, humans are just donuts without the frosting or the sprikles.
We’re the rejects in the donut display.
I don’t think any natural thing exists for a reason. That’s reserved for things made or at least caused by sentient beings.
is that a living fleshlight?
This is a place for science! Not (your deepest) fantasy!
If it has at least one hole, then it exists for a reason. ;)
It’s the roomba of the sea
