• Lemmyng@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    As if their consoderation of adopting AI into their dev stack wasn’t enough.

    Anyone have any recommendations for distros like Fedora that don’t have systemd and won’t consider using AI, but do support KDE?

    • neonchaos@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I’ve been going down there same rabbit hole. Right now, I’m trying to learn Slackware. Happy for other suggestions though

      • PushButton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        If you are willing to go the Slackware route, take a moment to explore Void Linux at that point…

  • ajikeshi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    age verification made easy:

    user has internet access -> contracts can only be made by adults -> thus age is verified…

    also… whoever provides minors internet access goes to jail

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 hour ago

      the whole point of age verification is control of adults. Kids are always just excuse, people who spout “think of the children!!” style rethoric always couldnt care less about kids. Those who do dont yell about it and actually do stuff to help kids, so its easy to tell them apart.

    • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 minutes ago

      I know this is tongue in cheek but kids should be able to use the internet. It’s important that kids become digitally literate and the wonders of the internet are great.

      It’s so obvious that social media has made the world an objectively worse place and this is just another extension of that. Social media companies should face consequences when they harm children, full stop. Personally, I’d be fine with banning social media outright but I understand some may have free speech concerns. However, I don’t see how the interests of corporate capital and the attention economy can be squared inside this circle. Corpos will always want to maximize screen-time and they don’t give a hot fuck who’s brain they melt. Unfortuantely we live in a world where even the president of the US is a demented pedophile rapist so I don’t have much hope for people like Zuck seeing the consequences of his actions.

      Social media is a societal disease and until we actually deal with the root of the problem, which honestly doesn’t have anything to do with kids at all and really boils down to capitalist incentives and their relation to the attention economy, we will continue to see harms inflicted upon the digital citizens of the world.

  • blacksnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I hope OpenSuse doesn’t follow, or I will have to switch to a fully community distro that have already said the f word to age verification

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    For solutions that back on actually “verifying” the age by requiring credit card or government ID, those suck.

    As described, this is an administrator self describing the age, which doesn’t mean much to anyone except kids of people who apply parental controls to systems their kids have access to.

    Accounts already require your “full name” but we don’t consider that “full name verification”.

    This proposal seems to be in the spirit of least intrusive means to let parents opt into this stuff if they want, with no ties to identity compromising third party/state “verification”.

    Question is whether this sort of solution that at least gives parents some chance will satisfy the lawmakers long term. For the wave of laws now, it seems to suffice to self attest age.

    • FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Accounts already require your “full name” but we don’t consider that “full name verification”.

      They don’t require anything. You can leave that empty or just put John Doe. All that is required for an account on a Linux system is a username and a password.

      • Attacker94@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        I don’t think they were referring to Linux in general, I think it was specifically talking about Fedora

      • sicktriple@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        If we’re talking about the criminals who are harming children (social media companies, roblox, etc) and actively pushing to influence legislation that allows them to continue this behavior while punishing the rest of us while taking away privacy for normal people, then idk. Prison seems too generous for those scum.

        I think the commenter here might be referring to regular people who are powerless and/of less than informed on the subject which I of course disavow. But if somelike like Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk never see the inside of of a prison cell, which is much more than they deserve, there is no justice in this world.

      • mrnobody@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        It’s the welcoming of surveillance with open arms! IF “protecting the children” is what we’re after, TRULY honestly after, then social media would be banned for anyone under the age of 18!

        The fact that Zuck KNOWS this (Meta and its current format) is the problem he pushes all blame to everyone and everything else. And like IDIOTS the government listens-mostly because they’re all bought and paid for anyway. FB did studies back in 2014 (that’s right over 12 years ago) or earlier to prove it wasnt addictive, and found it to be worse than they thought so they buried it!

        My guess is, before the hearing, Zuck and crew agreed this is the way to get gov off his back and also get gov MORE data and surveillance. It’s a win-win. Every obedient citizen who doesn’t know/understand technology says “OK I guess” and everyone else with half a spine and understanding… Takes a stand!!

        Facebook first released for 18+ users as it was for college and you needed your school’s .edu address to open an account. To grow the userbase, it was opened up to more and more users which then lead to more and more deceptive practices to always get that YoY growth.

        Meanwhile, it acts as an escape from reality as people hate their own lives, and “influencers” are the fakest ones feeding consumerism to others, because “if you do this one thing you can be good too” shit.

        Personally, if you directly do anything to mislead/misguide others for your own selfish gain, you should feel awful about holding back those around you, instead of working together to fight the system! Unfortunately, right now, too many people feel inadequacies, so we’re getting to the point where we say “fuck it” and so we do anything to get ahead…

        The TL;DR is: It’s no longer about connecting people, it’s about money, data, and control! Pretty much ALL social media is a cancer designed to keep users engaged to distract them from the shitty world around them as it falls apart.

        In the wise words of Sam Flynn, “We need to work together, it’s the only way!” 😁

        • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          I’m not talking about the age verification, I’m talking about hanging people who support it. Y’all need to get a sense of perspective.