Do you host your own ML / AI / LLM? What do you use, and what do you use it for?

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    I prefer my critical faculties completely intact and un-altered, thank you very much.
    I do not require or desire a 400 watt bullshit-artist yes-man or vulnerability coder cooking my GPU.

  • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    Running qwen3.6 27b through llama.cpp.

    It’s about as capable as sonnet 3.5.

    I use it for light scripting, but real coding is done by cloud models.

    I’m also using it as the brain for my Hermes agent. It sends me digests of news, subreddits, chats that I’d like to read but don’t have time for. It does a great job researching things on the web for me, too.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      Do you mean Sonnet 4.5?

      I don’t have the rig to run it at real speeds but I’ve played with it over API. Seems pretty good.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    No. I still have no use for it and everything I use is automated without at a far lower footprint.

  • chaospatterns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Partially. I started with hosting my own llama3.2 + granite4 models using Ollama for my Home Assistant smart home and for general chat with OpenWebUI. I also run whisper for speech-to-text locally on my 1080 Ti GPU. I like the privacy and ownership of my self-hosted models, but I started to run into limitations with the small weights. So I built some tools that allow me to selectively route traffic to larger models hosted on DeepInfra depending on my need. For example, to GLM/Kimi models for code reviews or for my custom harnesses or harder problems.

  • robber@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I currently run Qwen3.6-27b on llama.cpp and use it via openwebui. Mostly, I use it for web research via tavily, to a lesser extent for coding and interactively learning about things that are new to me but common in training data (such as basic math or ML concepts).

  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yes, llama-swap and I use it for home assistant text-gen notifications, basic coding tasks, etc

    If anyone here self-hosts definitely check out llama-swap as it has some nifty features for hotswapping LLMs, image generation models and voice models.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 minutes ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    LTS Long Term Support software version
    SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access

    3 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 3 acronyms.

    [Thread #27 for this comm, first seen 25th Jun 2026, 15:40] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • alexquiniou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m using anythingllm. It’s quite easy to setup and use. I’m impressed of the perf on comodity hardware.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I hosted Qwen 3.5 9b uncensored on my site at https://masland.tech/ for a while. I didn’t really use it and no one else used it so I took it down. These days I’m spending most of my time finding uses for AI and accessibility. One of the next things I’m planning is a video to text reasoning system, primarily for the purpose of grading used electronic devices.

  • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yes, I got a Strix Halo machine before the RAM price hike and use it to run all my ML stuff on it.

    Currently using llama-swap with llama.cpp/ComfyUI and opencode/Open WebUI as frontend.

    I’m running Qwen3.6-27b, Voxtral Mini 4b, Piper and Qwen Image. Also, some embedding and reranking models.

    I use them for:

    • Tagging and classification of my documents in Paperless
    • Home Assistant (voice assistant)
    • Translations (both text and image)
    • Transcriptions
    • Some light coding and debugging
    • Avatar/Backdrop generation for DnD sessions
      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        About 200 t/s prompt processing and 10-20 t/s with MTP.

        Greatly depends on the task, predictable things like code generates at 18-20 t/s. Creative writing more like 10-17 t/s.

          • robber@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Given the 27b is a dense model, I think the numbers are quite ok. Curious about the quant tho.

            The cool thing about the strix is its large unified memory, but it lacks memory bandwith for compute intensive workloads. Something like Qwen3.5-122b MoE with only like 12b active parameters might run at twice the speed if it fits the configuration.

            • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 minutes ago

              Yeah. Though I think theres a new strix out soon (Medusa? Gorgon? Something like that).

              Its a bit like my P40. On paper, it has 24GB. But that 24gb is capped at 400GB/s and the ai compute is what…Pascal era?

              AI = Good, fast, cheap - pick 2

  • eodur@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I have a simple slow model running on CPU in my cluster for karakeep. I’ve tried running a variety of models on my 7900XT but even with 16GB their performance just isn’t there. My new work m5 Mac book with 48GB of ram is the first time I’ve seen usable performance for local models and it has been pretty impressive.

  • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    i don’t use it at all, i do want some selfhosted speech to text model (whisper?) but my computer is ancient so it would be awfully slow. i have some multi hour audio recordings from presentations, would be nice to have them in text and searchable…

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      How ancient is ancient? TTS and STT are much lighter than llm. (eg: Whisper, Piper, Kokoro, Coqui etc)…you might have more capability than you think, especially if you’re doing batch processing like that.

      • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        a haswell xeon e5-1650 machine, i remember running llama 7b in llama.cpp in like 2023 and it was quite sluggish. guess i should try whisper at some point…

        • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Ha. You were doing inference on CPU on a haswell era. Been there, done that.

          OTOH…whisper.cpp is heavily optimised for it.

          Plus, you’re doing batch transcription, not real-time, so slow doesn’t actually matter.

          Fire Whisper small or medium overnight and wake up to searchable text.

          PS: if you want a good fast little llm, something like Qwen 3.6 2B will work well on the Xeon.

    • plasma8726@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Thanks for this link. Because of this article, I had claude stand up a llama.cpp container next to my already running ollama container. It ran side by side tests with the same model and parameters, and the results blew ollama out of the water. I’m in the process of moving hermes and openwebgui over to the llama.cpp instance to see how it goes day to day.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        54 minutes ago

        If you’re using docker anyway, and “fast” pure GPU models, you might try a vllm container while you’re at it.

        It should be much faster than even llama.cpp, albeit at the cost of context length, and it supports some exotic 4-bit quantization like SPQA.

        Same with TabbyAPI. It’s quantization is SOTA, though it does not support CPU offloading, and it’s speed is somewhere between vllm and llama.cpp.

      • tristynalxander@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s not that hard to use llama.cpp directly anyway. Why would I use a wrapper when I can just run a python script?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Or exllama! Vllm, sglang, Lorax. Koboldcpp, Aphrodite, text-generation-webui, LM Studio, powerinfer, ktransformers, mlc-LLM, really whatever floats your boat. Just not ollama, specifically.

    • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I agree that the concerns listed there are smells, and I wasn’t aware of some of the options listed there.

      Thank you for sharing this!

    • comrademiao@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      looks like extreme nitpicking without any real issues beyond some VC funding a FOSS issues.

      //whyre you spamming the comment to everyone? its quite alarmist actually

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I completely disagree.

        Frankly, I find the description “VC funding a FOSS” offensive. They aren’t funding the engine. I’ve been messing with LLM inference engines since 2022, and Ollama is the worst I’ve seen in the community.

        They misname models for SEO. They leech off llama.cpp while deliberately hiding attribution yet redirecting GH support requests there. They sometimes make their own GGUFs+forked releases which are broken and incompatibile with upstream llama.cpp, just so they can get a release out a day ahead for hype, even though it doesn’t really work and they’ll never upstream one line. They set a default context size thats basically unusable, they screw up chat templates and deep internal code with no obvious indicators, they release suboptimal quants without iMatrix, they gate you into their internal quantization repo and model card format, they hide model downloads on your hard drive, they mess with standard APIs for no good reason other than to mess up other backends. I could go on and on.

        And if that’s all fine, they’re enshittifying the app with closed code, and pointers to cloud models.

        They GIVE LLM inference a bad name, by making it a terrible quality engine that happens to show up in search as the “default.” Hence the comments below of people being unimpressed with local inference. And they sap attention from actual llama.cpp devs, without contributing a single dime. Everyone in the localllama communtity hates their guts, and that’s not even getting into the interpersonal drama they’ve stirred.

        They are a leech that’s a net drag to the whole community, that we can’t get rid of because they’re attention grifters. And they’ve gotten worse and worse over time.


        It’s more morale to use any cloud API over Ollama, in my eyes. They’re a grift.


        EDIT: And, to be clear, I’m not against VC funded downstream stuff.

        LM Studio is good! Even though it’s closed source.

        Tons of downstream projects are great.

  • algernon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yes. My Actual Intelligence lives in my head, and runs mostly on coffee.