• Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’ve known people that refuse to play a game if it has been solved, even if they don’t know the optimal moves.

    Like, there is no difference to the play experience if both players don’t know the solution.

      • four@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I think snakes and ladders is like watching sports. You pick a team (somewhat arbitrarily) and attach yourself emotionally to how well it does just to feel something.

      • Godort@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Is Snakes and Ladders considered solved?

        I’m not sure it counts if there are zero choices provided to the player

          • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I would argue against that conclusion. In some games and optimal policy is the best that you can come up with, and we consider that a solution.

            It’s a recursive game by nature, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t the best move.

            • squaresinger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              In snakes and ladders there isn’t a move. There’s not a single choice in the whole game. From the viewpoint of game theory it is not even a game, since a game requires choice. Without choice no strategy, without strategy no game in the sense of game theory.

              And a non-game without strategy or choice cannot have a solution.