Transcript

Screenshot of Octopi Package Manager installed on CachyOS (previously the default before being replaced by Shelly). OP has searched for microsoft-edge. No results are returned.

OP has drawn a circle around a button in the image of an alien head with an arrow pointing to it. Under the arrow is “???”.

Caption at the bottom of the image reads: “Microsoft edge and google chrome don’t show up in neither of cachyos’ software stores out of the box. On octopi you can make it show up by pressing the weird alien head icon. “Mysteriously” firefox shows up on both stores immediately without clicking any obscure buttons. This is either extremely terrible i design or a deliberate sabotage attempt against microsoft and google from loonix devs, possibly sponsored by mozilla.”

Context:

OP is an idiot because these browsers would not be available due to restrictions required by Microsoft and Google to share their software, which is why nothing shows up when searching the installed repositories. Note that Chromium, the base for Edge and Chrome is available on the default repository.

The alien head icon searches the AUR (Arch User Repository) a place for users to add packages, often mirrored from GitHub, which would show Edge and Chrome as a user has ported it over unofficially. Because the AUR consists of unofficial packages, it is not part of the default repositories, and requires additional confirmation before installation.

Note that when installing from the AUR, it is always important to read what you are compiling as packages are not checked for malicious code. See recent news regarding compromised packages that weren’t maintained.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    There’s a nugget of truth here.

    Linux distros require some understanding of underlying subsystems.

    Windows… in theory, does not. From AverageUser9000’s perspective, they can hit the Windows key, type “Google Chrome,” and install it, while on linux it’s not immediately obvious why it doesn’t. You’d have to look up documentation on linux repos, 3rd party repos, containerized stores, and… now you’ve just lost the interest of 99% of the population.


    I’m not saying AverageUser9000 isn’t a moron, but I kind of sympathize too. We are effectively linux experts, and:

    XCKD familiarity

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      Oh I definitely don’t disagree with you. There’s a learning curve to be had. Part of that is just the UX of Linux (and the differing UIs), but I think the other part is straight up education.

      Apple early on adopted the strategy of giving computers to schools to get kids used to using their products, but at some point that shifted over to Microsoft as Office was the business standard. Many kids grew up knowing how to use Microsoft products and got used to using them. Shifting to a different unfamiliar platform is harder once you’re comfortable with something.

      Of course then Google stepped in and started pushing cheap Chromebooks to schools and moving people off physical software and storage to cloud products. Now that is trending towards iPads with just apps continuing the online only software options.

      So now you’ve got a generation of kids who don’t even know how to operate a PC let alone do something as basic as open a file.

      It all comes down to education. If schools adopted Linux and introduced it to kids at an early age, I’m sure they’d be proficient with it.

  • schroedingersKoala@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    I feel Microsoft and Google sabotage themselves and shoot themselves repeatedly in their own feet w/o any outside assistance.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I actually find it kind of funny that MSFT does have an official linux release for Edge but not for Office.

    It would seem like they want it to be a Windows only feature as a way to keep people on Windows, but they have a Mac release of it eith the full feature set lol.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That’s for practical reasons.

      Edge is Google Chrome underneath. So a linux release isn’t much more dev effort on Microsoft’s part.

      But they develop Office, and obviously linux was never a commercial target for it.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 hour ago

        There’s also the secondary reason which is they barely give a shit about the local office apps and want you to use 365 and the in browser versions.

        I’m surprised they even offer the office suite local at all anymore.

    • cannedtuna@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well, they want your browsing data for one so that would make sense, but for Office they don’t want businesses hoping to Linux to get away from Windows if the business suite was available there. Since Office is the “industry standard” they just hold it hostage. If Libre Office adoption ever takes off, I’m sure Microsoft will port it over to recoup lost revenue, but that will only happen if they get desperate.

      As for Mac, they may have just broken Office for Mac for a lot of users.

  • LemmyPlaceDN@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    11 minutes ago

    Another example of dark patterns and anti-competitive practices against big tech. Typical free and open-source software. /s

  • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    6 hours ago

    You’ll notice another blatant act of sabotage: LibreOffice is easy to find but Word is nowhere to be found.

  • chaogomu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I rather liked the AUR when I had it, sadly I needed a flatpak for a project, and my previous distro threw a fit when I attempted to get things working regardless, so now I’m on Pop!.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People on Lemmy take everything extremely seriously. I see so many shitposts and fake texts that people treat as if they’re 100% real and genuine.

      • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s both funny and kinda sad.

        So many lemmites don’t have much going on so they treat their interests as core personality treats.

      • cannedtuna@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They’re absolutely serious. Here’s a post defending telemetry. The mod accuses anyone who speaks well of Linux as a “evangelists” and bans them.

        It’s not the “lol birds aren’t real” kinda jerk, it’s the “the earth is flat” kind.

        • pivot_root@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The funny part is that despite telemetry that shows how little people interact with Copilot, it still gets shoved down our throats.

          Nobody writing anything seriously is going to use Notepad, and yet…

          • cannedtuna@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Actually no. I had shared that link somewhere 3 weeks ago in a chat and just copied it over. But whatever bro

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Is the Reddit one serious? I know the lemmy.world one created by madthumbs appears to take itself seriously.