Women are just as capable of unreasonable demands for mind reading as men are, and something tells me that if the title was “Use your big boy words” you wouldn’t have said anything.
It’s equally telling that you think I’m the one on a crusade given the literal hundreds of similar comments I see from velma on /c/all all of the time.
Anyways, as for tags, I don’t know if it’s implemented into the Lemmy website directly, but most third party clients allow it in their settings, and I think there are also browser extensions you can install for it.
Edit: I don’t like to go through people’s comment histories, but since velma has specifically asked me to do so below, I’ll update with a few examples when I can get back to my desktop PC later.
In the meantime, I think anyone else should also feel free to jump in with their own favorite examples.
Edit: I don’t like to go through people’s comment histories, but since velma has specifically asked me to do so below, I’ll update with a few examples when I can get back to my desktop PC later.
In the meantime, I think anyone else should also feel free to jump in with their own favorite examples.
By all means. Sort it by controversial if you’d like.
You’ll find a lot of comments about Graham Platner that way.
“I’ve got enough of the comments that you did make to judge you on the ones you don’t.”
and I edited it for style and readability.
I edit my comments like this all the time and will continue to do so as long as it doesn’t change the general meaning/intent. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but then again, I don’t like all of the misandry in your comments and would much rather you edit it out after the fact, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Misogyny being objectively worse than misandry in a wide variety of ways does not excuse you from adding to the misandry that does exist, in this case demonizing OP for a title that clearly wasn’t misogynist and which could easily have been based on their lived experience.
We should be lifting each other up, not fighting about who is dragging each other down harder.
Idk man it seemed kind of misogynist to me. If you make a general unqualified statement based on your lived experience, you are (ambiguously) applying that experience to others based only on their immutable qualities. At least, that would not be an uncommon nor entirely unfounded reading of the statement’s intent.
The whole “I’m just innocently asking questions” schtick clearly isn’t working in this thread. You’ll get 'em next time though (as long as you post in womensstuff where nobody will call you out on it, of course!)
Like I very clearly stated in the other thread, I avoid you except for calling out your misandry bullshit, and this comment is more than close enough to qualify.
That wasn’t on purpose. For anyone reading this thread who is interested, the original comment was:
“Something tells me that if the title was “Use your big boy words”, you wouldn’t have commented.”
I edited it less than two minutes after posting, realizing that my response could use more context - I had no way of knowing you’d responded that fast.
Women are just as capable of unreasonable demands for mind reading as men are, and something tells me that if the title was “Use your big boy words” you wouldn’t have said anything.
What an interesting and not at all telling crusade you seem invested in.
A complete non sequitur for the audience at large: Does lemmy have a RES equivalent yet to tag users?
It’s equally telling that you think I’m the one on a crusade given the literal hundreds of similar comments I see from velma on /c/all all of the time.
Anyways, as for tags, I don’t know if it’s implemented into the Lemmy website directly, but most third party clients allow it in their settings, and I think there are also browser extensions you can install for it.
Edit: I don’t like to go through people’s comment histories, but since velma has specifically asked me to do so below, I’ll update with a few examples when I can get back to my desktop PC later.
In the meantime, I think anyone else should also feel free to jump in with their own favorite examples.
By all means. Sort it by controversial if you’d like.
You’ll find a lot of comments about Graham Platner that way.
It’s really easy to make claims with no evidence, isn’t it?
I’m so glad you’ve judged me for a comment I didn’t make then.
I’ve seen enough of the comments that you did make to be more than confident of my guess.
You have excellent mind-reading skills /s
Another edit after I responded.
Don’t your comments stand on their own?
For anyone interested, the original comment was:
“I’ve got enough of the comments that you did make to judge you on the ones you don’t.”
and I edited it for style and readability.
I edit my comments like this all the time and will continue to do so as long as it doesn’t change the general meaning/intent. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but then again, I don’t like all of the misandry in your comments and would much rather you edit it out after the fact, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Misandry does not exist the same way misogyny does.
I won’t be editing this one either.
Misogyny being objectively worse than misandry in a wide variety of ways does not excuse you from adding to the misandry that does exist, in this case demonizing OP for a title that clearly wasn’t misogynist and which could easily have been based on their lived experience.
We should be lifting each other up, not fighting about who is dragging each other down harder.
Idk man it seemed kind of misogynist to me. If you make a general unqualified statement based on your lived experience, you are (ambiguously) applying that experience to others based only on their immutable qualities. At least, that would not be an uncommon nor entirely unfounded reading of the statement’s intent.
Lol, this couldn’t be a more perfect response for you to have made after the last comment of yours that I read.
Link for anyone interested: https://lemmy.world/comment/25127146
Did I demonize OP by quoting the title?
I’m confused as to why you even bothered quoting the title if you had no meaning behind your quotation.
Sounds very “I’m just asking question here”
The whole “I’m just innocently asking questions” schtick clearly isn’t working in this thread. You’ll get 'em next time though (as long as you post in womensstuff where nobody will call you out on it, of course!)
I thought you were avoiding me? Here you are again. Love to see it.
Like I very clearly stated in the other thread, I avoid you except for calling out your misandry bullshit, and this comment is more than close enough to qualify.
In what way is calling out percieved misogyny considered misandry?
In the same way calling out perceived misandry is considered misogyny, apparently.
What do you think OP meant by the title?
That the original OP clearly had a specific person in mind when making the meme.
Oh you edited your comment after I replied, sneaky.
That wasn’t on purpose. For anyone reading this thread who is interested, the original comment was:
“Something tells me that if the title was “Use your big boy words”, you wouldn’t have commented.”
I edited it less than two minutes after posting, realizing that my response could use more context - I had no way of knowing you’d responded that fast.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Mhm, I quoted the title.