• DisgruntledPelican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Every stars are aligned. We are At the top level of capitalism greed. For decades tech companies have piled up as much cash as possible sucking every dime selling their product. Now they want to rent their service instead. The best to do that is to host the service on a super computer, the user having only a low power terminal. They deliberately crippled the os to use the maximum ram and said we need to update our computer for ai and other things most don’t want, don’t need and don’t have the money to pay for it. The best move is to exchange their huge pile of cash to drain the whole market to build data centres. They now want everyone to become dependant on ai and pay them a significant part of our salary to satisfy their shareholders.

  • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It should be noted that they haven’t become harder or more expensive to make. They just cost more.

    • Nautalax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      More demand exists so they can raise prices and still sell out their product to someone, most anyone will take free money on the table. Would expect the prices to go down only if more fabrication plants come online in numbers enough to satisfy that demand with way more supply, or if the demand plunges (ex. AI bubble pops)

      But it can take billions of dollars and years of work to build fabrication plants so new supply is slow to come online… and they want to be REALLY sure that they won’t become bagholders of epic proportion by investing that kind of money into plants only for a bubble to pop which would leave them with a lot of debt but only able to sell oversupplied RAM at very low prices

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Normalized here means inflation adjusted. They’re saying RAM hasn’t been this expensive in a very long time

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Once again, thanks Madoff Altman for buying up all the chip supply just to monopolize it. I’m never gonna let that go.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Well, the current trajectory points to:

    • LLM capabilities topping out.

    • All the tooling around them not keeping up anyway.

    • Actual “AGI” being distant and completely unrelated to contemporary models.

    • Inference costs plummeting.

    The last one is critical.

    Right this second, you can run Minimax H3 on a desktop for the tiny fraction of the compute/RAM OpenAI Sora took. And it’s better.

    In a month, it will be ~8X faster.

    You can run DeepseekV4 flash, dirt cheap, and get what Claude was less than a year ago. And it’s gonna spread to every host out there, to systems like Cerebas ASICs that don’t even need HBM.


    So… Even if you’re an AI acolyte. And we go with that for the sake of argument…

    We don’t actually need all that RAM for hosting generative models?


    I’m very interested to see what happens to all these datacenters over the next two-three years.

    They spent all this money on something that’s gonna be cheap as dirt to run, largely run locally, and that won’t need GPUs once bitnet takes off, sooo… they can’t make money off that.

    What happens then?

    What happens to all those Stargate RAM wafers, and excess datacenters?

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Will it though?

        I posit there’s a saturation point where there’s “enough” LLM in use, and we are not far from that.

        The whole pitch from Altman and such is scaling models up. But that’s not working.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What happens to all those Stargate RAM wafers, and excess datacenters?

      The bigger question is what happens to the world-economy when the largest players bottom out and the companies betting on them are massively downgraded because of their huge investments in a fantasy about eternal growth. Hope everyone is setting aside extra cash; it’s gonna make 2008 look like a walk in the park.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Traditionally during such busts the government starts outright confiscating bank accounts or otherwise enacts some fiscal policy that renders all savings (especially those in cash) completely worthless in a last bid to pass the buck onto the 99%.

        • Sparrow_1029@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          54 minutes ago

          You’re saying there’s precedent that indicates the gov’t will just “confiscate” peoples savings? Could you elaborate? I’m genuinely interested to know about this, because that’s… not good

    • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Deepseek v4 Flash is insanely good and basically free. Especially the latest model which I think is only available from China right now.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Look on the bright side. If we hook up a dynamo to his coffin we might be able to power an AI data centre.

  • StrawberryPigtails@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    13 hours ago

    About the only upside to this that I can think of is that maybe, just maybe, programmers will start being more frugal with their memory usage. Everything else just sucks.

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              50 minutes ago

              Not when the processing happens in one of the many data centers that’ll be sold off when the AI bubble bursts.

              I fully expect them to start heavily advertising VDI in the near future.

          • NekoKoneko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Well… Okay. But only if I can keep paying the subscription fee for the rest of my life in order to maintain access.

            • Kwozyman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 hours ago

              That’s why we’ve created the GenPro tier of subscriptions, the first generational loan. Get it now and your kids can help pay of back!

          • undrwater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You still need to run streamed games in RAM. A lot of RAM.

            Well…we’ll go back to Zork and Venture.

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yeah, I think that’s the running theory of the corporate backup plan if/when AI falls through and they need to find a use for all the data center resources.

        • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          They’ll never understand that.

          They’ll assume the poor sales have to do with the genre, the subject matter, millennials killing the gaming industry, literally ANYTHING but the actual reason their supposed customers keep yelling about.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The money is micro transactions and the whales have $7k gpus…

          Everyone else is just fodder so the pay to win accounts have someone to feel better than.

          COD a while ago got caught out for juicing the matchmaking odds right after you buy a new skin. Didn’t matter what you bought or how much. A purchase made your next couple lobbies be filled with scrubs on one side, and you and some above averages on the other.

          After X amounts of games it wore off, and since those games pushed you up in the normal metrics, you’re now in lobbies above your skill level. So even if you get a “fair” game, you’re going to do badly, until you buy a skin again or lose to your actual skill level.

          That’s why everyone started complaining about COD matchmaking, even if you bought nothing, everyone was on the same micro transaction maximizing rollercoaster.

          A cynic would say that’s why it went free on Xbox, they need a population of players to make the whale milking work. Even if those people only fire it up a few hours a month and never buy anything, getting matched with someone above your skill level who just bought a stupid skin makes you the product they sell to the whales.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 hours ago

      programmers will start being more frugal with their memory usage.

      They 100% will.

      Windows had started only “certifying” machines with 32gb as “windows ready” because they wanted the headroom to cram on AI features and use what we pay for instead of a data center.

      But because no one was buying 32gb machines and a machine without that sticker will end up with Linux…

      They just dropped it, and now they’ll have to keep optimizing for 16gb instead of just letting everything bloat. If they don’t, they risk every entry level machine making people eventually switch to Linux for a much better experience. Windows has to run on entry level or people don’t get sucked in, no one converts to windows later in life.

      That’s a huge deal, if 32gb was the default for windows it would be the default for everything. Every game and design/modeling program would feel safe to assume 32gb was the norm. Like, imagine what chrome would do assuming there’s 32gb to play with.

      Now they can’t, and they’ll know requiring 32gb will cut off some possible consumers.

      It’s not like Windows is the good guys tho, it never should have been 32, and arguably should be 8gb forever, even if it required a lightweight mode. Most people would prefer a super stripped down Windows even with 64gb. Most of the bloat is useless, I could live without any updates after we didn’t have to quit to DOS to launch a game.

      • Exec@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Windows had started only “certifying” machines with 32gb as “windows ready” because they wanted the headroom to cram on AI features and use what we pay for instead of a data center.

        Meanwhile as of 4 days ago: https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/microsoft-quietly-purges-32gb-of-ram-recommendations-from-its-website-company-reels-from-the-effects-of-the-memory-shortage-as-it-released-8gb-base-models-for-surface-laptops-this-year

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Buddy, really?

          But because no one was buying 32gb machines and a machine without that sticker will end up with Linux…

          They just dropped it,

          Did you not understand it or just assume none of the later text kept explaining it so you immediately stopped ready?

          It’s not just you, I see this shit all over these days, what the fuck are you people doing?

      • Sequence5666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I am quite amazed at your knowledge and foresight. Really cool!

        I never assumed such a scenario where ram limit will limit our infrastructure too. What do you consider will happen with people who are actually needing ram but unable to afford? And that number reaches significantly higher volume, like 60% of population?

        Like maybe an open source project of building ram seems feasible?

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          38 minutes ago

          What will happen is they’ll start selling zero clients and a subscription to a virtual desktop, using all of the data centers left over after the AI bubble pops.

          Unless someone decides to enter the chip fab industry just for consumer hardware, owning your own machine might not be a thing in a few years.

      • melfie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        no one converts to windows later in life

        That’s why you gotta start kids off right. Perfect starter laptop is the 10 year old clunker running Mint.

      • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        At this point i don’t see why we would need more RAM for basic OS or web usage tbh.

        Like we’ve hit a point where things are covered. Obviously this won’t stop capitalists from doing capitalist bullshit though… and bloat is a thing.

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Not going to disagree, but “web usage” is basically everything. You can literally run an entire desktop operating system from 2007 on a virtual machine emulated in JavaScript in your browser now.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    For all the reasons I despise Sam Altman, this is the primary reason. It was shrewd of him to lock up the entire market, but that doesn’t make it any less sociopathic. The entire world is negatively affected by this. What an asshole.