this isn’t just boomerhumor, you missed something

  • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I disagree, books can never have as colorful worlds in my head as movies an comics. Unless I watched the movie before I read the book. Book is just slower information transfer than audiovisual, but it’s not limited to what can be visualized. In the end both is passive consumption unlike something active like videogames

    • TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Case in point: I absolutely LOVE The Lord of the Rings films. Absolute masterpieces that haven’t aged A DAY.

      Tolkien’s “The Fellowship of the Ring” had me asleep in 25 pages.

  • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I have aphantasia.

    How does reading and watching it in your mind’s eye change anything from just watching it on a screen?

    I prefer audio books because it allows me to critically think better during because I can listen and think at same time, but reading words takes more brain power.

    • RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I guess it’s a matter of preference, because in my mind there’s no way listening takes less brainpower than reading.

      • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s probably very different from person to person, since its different how well they can parse heard words and seen words. For me hearing is way faster, but I’m also more likely to confuse sounds than characters.

    • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We usually think in linguistic concepts even when reading a book, one of the most difficult things to do with a student when they are learning drawing is teaching them to really see instead of thinking of linguistic traits. I have aphantasia and it is difficult for me to recall visual traits so instead i focus on visual recipes, or construction while drawing. It is difficult for me to recall faces for example but if i reduce a face to geometric shapes and proportions and do a lot of trial and error so i can approximate a face I’ve seen.

      So when reading is not that I am seeing things, but i am making a conceptual map, an abstraction. Kinda like how dreams are like stories we tell ourselves to the point they might seem like intangible images. Sometimes I feel my brain relate stuff i read to things i’ve already seen, or builds some conceptual bridge between known concepts to unknown ones.

      But reading is also a practice on itself different than hearing. Language has aesthetics, rhythm character. I feel i learn more about the aesthetic beauty of language by reading it on the page than hearing it on an audio book because it forces me to build that bridge between my horizon of understanding and the authors’.

      This is especially true for authors that have an entirely different background than me because to understand them i need to read slower and research. Something that audio books doesn’t allow with it’s predisposed presentation.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t think this is very related to phantasia… With a book you can stop and think about things (imaginatively or critically). With video your entire attention is captured and it’s quite difficult to step away from the narrative being presented. In my experience audio is somewhere in between, and I’m able to zone out on my own tangent sometimes (but this is annoying, because I miss things)

    • driftwood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I do too, and I didn’t know it was different for others until I was an adult. When I was young they used to guilt trip me for wasting my intelligence because I hated books.

      I grew up inspired by creative world building shown in movies like LOTR and in games. I read more than most people, but it’s never books.

      I hate how so many people fail to consider others might not have the same perspective or needs.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I read a lot of SciFi when I was a teen. I learned not to bother seeing the movie if one was made. They always got so much wrong, and by “wrong” I mean it didn’t match my imagination.

    This is why I’m currently hesitating to watch Hail Mary Project.

    • sylphrin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m a big fan of the book. Couldn’t stand the movie.

      I was really surprised because, while I have a track record of hating adaptations of books I’ve read, a lot of my friends that had read the book absolutely loved the movie. So I thought maybe it would be okay, even if I didn’t love it. But I couldn’t finish the movie at all, I didn’t even make it halfway.

      Out of curiosity, have you watched and read 2001: A Space Odyssey? How did that comparison go, if you have?

    • minfapper@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Well, I’m glad I didn’t read the book then. I watched it with no expectations going in and had a great time.

    • Davel23@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The movie actually gets it mostly right. It’s not 100% true to the book, no movie can be but it’s pretty damn close.