I figured, thanks for checking.

its worth mentioning that the poster of the downvoted thread, and the mod who did the ban are the same person.

Was there ever any doubt?

No mod ever bans people for downvoting other people’s posts. They only ban you for hurting their own personal feefees.

Yes, I accidentally vote when scrolling sometimes, especially when fur baby bumps my hand or device. I’ve probably voted in ways that would horrify me.

or that person could contact me and tell me it was an accidental gesture and I would unban

I seemed like a violation of something, part of why I downvoted it.

It’s been removed now. Sorry it took a bit.

Same here, I saw this thread, checked out the post mentioned, downvoted the unsubstantiated claims, and am now waiting for my ban.

If the mod in question happens to read this, you should learn from this, don’t just post random accusations of this nature, post evidence of your accusation, including sourcing the information you reference.

By not doing this, you reduce the impact of not just your own use of the accusation, but also everyone else’s.

I liked the stuff they posted. Until now.

That upvotes and downvotes don’t always mean agree or disagree should be implicit, but I suppose it needs to be said out loud.

I understand, thank you.

Being called a zionist and/or a fascist on lemmy is basically a welcome greeting. I have genuinely never been anywhere online where there is this level of purity testing.

This is why no one takes .ml seriously but yourselves.

Where was I called a fascist? How am I a fascist?

I never disagreed with banning for downvote bots and troll accounts. I’ve done it myself when I was trying to get my communities started, on the very rare occasion I found an account with tens of thousands of downvotes. I disagree with banning for one downvote.

I post leftist media. Also rocks and art. If you have a problem with anything I post, come say so. I don’t ban people for arguing with me.

That first link shows an extended conversation between two users who disagreed respectfully. It doesn’t seem to say what you think it says.

The only way the second link shows anything is if you genuinely don’t understand the idea of context. There’s a bit of a difference between responding to a single instance of something, and an established pattern of behavior.

You’re incoherent.

With all that said, the idea that you would downvote a post warning about fascists on Lemmy says pretty much all that needs to be said, though. You were scratched.

Do you know they were fascists or did you just blindly trust some randy who made a hit list with no explanation or context?

Because i think Wren was reasonable in downvoting such a list and was valid in her points when mrdown ended up banning her for downvoting his post. To me, that shows a poor judge of character, someone who power trips and who may or may not be fucked in the head, as is custom on lemmy.

And believe me, I don’t always agree with Wren on things and have had pretty big disagreements with her in other threads, but her downvoting a bonkers hitlist is not reflecting poorly on her, like you seem to think it does. All your comment did was show that you don’t have critical thinking in this issue and prefer to believe something without evidence because you don’t like Wren. This is why lemmy is such a hellhole browse if you’re remotely normal and are used to people being able to disagree without having to walk on eggshells and fearing being labelled as something terrible out of nowhere. It is sp fucking ironic how those of you who screech the loudest about fascism are acting exactly like them the second you get a bit of power.

If they saw someone consistently downvoting their posts, that’s a decent reason to ban a user.
[…]
I banned a couple users in the early days of my communities for downvoting posts back to back, every day. I figured if they didn’t like anything I posted anyway but kept looking at it, I’d help them out with a red flag.

So I donno, maybe you deserved it, or maybe they pay too much attention to votes and over-reacted. Probably better to block them if you don’t like their stuff.

Hmm. That’s not… even remotely the same thing? And seems very reasonable?

It’s not unclear, it’s just unreasonable.

So explain that in the post instead of just listing names and then instantly banning anyone who doesn’t blindly accept it…

Sad little king of a sad little hill. This the most power you have ever had in your life isn’t it? Your big crowning achievement?

I stand firmly behind my belief that Zion National Park is superior to all other national parks.