• Xed@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Avatar the last air bender ( live action ) movie. I was a child when the movie came out so I had no clue who the director was and how shitty of a movie I was in for. The ending recked me since it didn’t even have a satisfying conclusion. Just pure garbage

    I was in genuine shock of how bad of a movie I’d gotten into. Never again

  • Maestro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Star Wars: Rise of Skywalker. I went in with very low expectations and it still managed to disappoint so badly that it makes me angry. I hate how the Palpatine plot point retroactively ruins the entire original trilogy.

  • golli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    For me it might be the Hobbit Trilogy.

    The LotR Trilogy are my all time favorite movies and the contrast couldn’t be greater. Really goes to show what a perfect storm it was that we got the movies we got with LotR.

    • kossa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      There’s a fan cut out there on the high seas, where they basically condensed those three shitty movies into one which follows the book as close as possible. That one is bearable and as far as I am concerned the official Hobbit movie now.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “Sky Captain And The World Of Tomorrow.”

    The beginning is great. Giant robots attacking New York.

    Then it just becomes boring and ridiculous.

    Posters promised Angelina Jolie. she shows up for five minutes and doesn’t do anything.

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not saying you’re wrong, but praising the giant robot attack on New York before swerving into critiquing the latter half of the movie for being ridiculous is a funny juxtaposition.

  • popcar2@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The Matrix Resurrections. I already had a feeling it would suck but it managed to be worse than I could ever imagine, they weren’t even trying to hide how much of a cashgrab it is.

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The previous two were utter dogshit… how could you expect anything different?

      • popcar2@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Matrix 2 & 3 were masterpieces by comparison, not as good as 1 but they were at least enjoyable.

        • IWW4@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          They were steaming piles of dogshit…

          There was nothing enjoyable about those dogshit movies.

  • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Gladiator 2. If anyone can do spectacle, it’s Ridley Scott. But good goddamn, the action in that movie sucked so hard. And all the best lines were quotes from the original. Denzel was the only half enjoyable thing because I think he realized how bad the movie was and just had a blast with it.

  • Tujio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I know that knocking on it is overdone, but Phantom Menace. I was 13 when it came out, huge Star Wars fan, absolutely target market. Walked out so sad and confused.

      • Tujio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Basically? It was a kids movie. Characters were one-dimensional and not very likeable to teenage me. Exposition by dialogue, and not great dialogue. Slapstick bits that really didn’t land (Jar Jar). Etc, etc.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Granted, I was like 4 when it came out so it still holds some fondness in my view. Qui-Gon was like the father figure I always needed but never had, and Jar Jar laid the foundation for my sense of humor. Maybe that’s why no one thinks I’m funny…

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          And the originals weren’t kids movies?

          I guess the massive amount of Star Wars toys I had as a child somehow led me to believe otherwise.

          Original trilogy are also kids movies, fight me.

        • golli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          But imo at its core it still has a good idea, unlike the sequels, which really are just style over substance. Which is why i can forgive the prequels quite a bit more, especially considering Geroge Lucas did try to get other directors onboard to make them.

  • missingno@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Violet Evergarden: The Movie. My heart sank when I realized exactly where this was going, after all of her character development that’s the ending they decided to undermine it all with.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It made me want to never re-watch the series, too. The pedophilic undercurrent to the movie makes parts of the show so, so, much worse.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “The Man Who Killed Don Quixote” I guess.

    12 Monkeys was great, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas was brilliant, I liked The Brothers Grimm and Tideland. Gillian supposedly was trying to make Don Quixote for decades, it was his passion project and it turned out to be a big nothingburger. I never heard anyone mention if after the premier. I read the books and the movie simply used some characters and scenes from them. The movie was “inspired by” the books in the most boring, superficial way possible.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I fell asleep while watching James Cameron’s Avatar in an IMAX theater on release.

    Most tedious movie of his career until the sequels (guessing, didn’t give the sequels a chance because why would I?)

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The Legend of Ochi.

    The trailer made it look like a great indie-fantasy movie with Willem Dafoe and Emily Watson. But the actual movie is full of AI-generated environments, the acting is subpar and Dafoe and Watson don’t have a lot of screentime.

    Sometimes I really question my AAA24 membership. 😅

    Megalopolis was equally disappointing. Granted, the movie has some amazing VFX and practical effects, so they cut all of the best shots into the trailer and made this trainwreck look competent and interesting. The actual movie then felt like a fever dream, you can really see respected actors like Adam Driver and Nathalie Emmanuel struggle with their own script. Plus all of the really bad VFX shots that did not make it into the trailer, of course.

    At least we got the “Get back to the club” meme out of it.

  • IanTwenty@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Once Upon a Time in America. Maybe I watched a bad version but it made little sense and the ending was dreadful.

    Reading about it right now on wikipedia I probably saw the ‘condensed’ version which was savaged by the critics:

    Some critics compared shortening the film to shortening Richard Wagner’s operas, saying that works of art that are meant to be long should be given the respect they deserve. In his 1984 review, Roger Ebert gave the uncut version four stars out of four and wrote that it was “an epic poem of violence and greed”, but described the American theatrical version as a “travesty”. Furthermore, he gave the American theatrical version one star out of four, calling it “an incomprehensible mess without texture, timing, mood, or sense”.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Once_Upon_a_Time_in_America

    • IWW4@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It is the most overrated movie of all time. Four hours of nothing… every single scene is 5times longer than it needs to be.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    easy one: Jurassic Park (1993)

    I had read the book, maybe, a dozen times before the film came out, and holy shit was I disappointed. crushed, really. Not just in what they changed, but also what they left out. it totally ruined for me books adapted to film. any time I see a film based on a book I’ve read, I’m always let down.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      oh man I was so disapointed in the book compared to the moive. I feel crichton has great ideas but is not a good writer. It is one of the few writers where I prefer the movies.