What a time to be alive.

  • Toneswirly@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The real question is: How is this ever going to make money for Walmart? The second a developer tries to put this in a game they’re gonna be laughed off the internet.

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They likely won’t. More likely, the devs will put these products in the most funny places (say, billboards on the side of the road in American Truck Simulator). They’ll keep this thing running for ~5 years and they’ll axe it.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I could be wrong, but isn’t the title a bit misleading? As far as I can tell, Walmart made an SDK thing and pushed it to the Unity asset store. I don’t think Unity specifically went out of their way to make or promote it.

  • Ricky Rigatoni@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’ve been thinking for a while about once vr gets adopted more we could make virtual reality storefronts to use instead of websites. It would be fun I think.

    • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The concept of buying real items inside a videogame has never made sense to me.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        With RickyRigatoni’s idea, it wouldn’t be a videogame. It would be a separate program you launch specifically to order things online. It just happens to use a game engine for its implementation, because game engines are the most advanced simulation tool humanity has developed…

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        A high quality VR store where I can actually physically browse the isles would be superior to trying to browse a 2D website. And being able to pick up a product, with a realistic 3D model, look at it from any angle and visually compare packaging sizes across brands - like I can in a real store but can’t on a website - would be nice.

        I can’t tell you how many times I accidentally ordered a too small or too big version of something, because product photos on websites are always the same size (just fill the frame).

        Of course, this will never happen. If a store had a budget to make this, they could use that budget to make their online shopping website 10x better instead.

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          One time, I got delivered teaspoons instead of spoons, because I couldn’t tell the difference from the picture (and the description did not bother mentionuing that at all).

          Another time, I got delivered light bulbs the size of a toddler’s head, because the manufacturer decided to use a picture of a regular-size bulb. Well, and in the online store, the size only got mentioned as actual width/height values in the details.

          But yeah, we do already have the technology to place a banana next to your product, and to take photos from all angles. Manufacturers and stores just don’t see enough of a benefit from actually doing that, so have a singular picture in a white void, which shows a different product. You’re welcome! 👍