• BryyM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    She did write/say that there was no defense versus the killing curse did she not? (Except being Harry P that is)

    • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No defense against “Power Word Kill” either but wizards in every other setting are renowned for coming up with magical rube goldberg machines to kill, just like a guy.

          • Kirp123@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            The other guy counterspells your counterspell (I hate what they did to that spell in DnD 5e).

            Also there are more ways to stop Power Word Kill than counterspell. It requires a verbal component so if you can prevent the caster from speaking they can’t cast it. It’s an instant death effect so the spell Death Ward also protects you from it’s effects. Oh it only has a 60 ft range so you can just stay out of the range of the spell and just negate it.

            • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 hours ago

              yeah, wild finding out that was a thing. at least pathfinder had other weird shit you could do with dispel magic, like steal their spells or inflict magical backlash damage.

              I hope I never play a game where every wizard has to have a finger on the “save me from scary magic” button. no, fuck it. we ball in here

              • Kirp123@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                4 hours ago

                In older DnD editions it was more complex and honestly cooler. You had to expend a spell to counterspell, usually the same spell the enemy was trying to cast or a spell that negated their spell. For example you could cast Haste to counterspell a Slow spell or a Cure Wounds spell to negate an Inflict Wounds one. It made it more involved than: snap and your spell fails.

                  • jtrek@startrek.website
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    There are several problems.

                    One. Wotc are seeking players who aren’t paying attention and have no head for rules. They don’t want complexity.

                    Two, it’s bad to make one class have a ton of complexity while others stay at “I move and attack”, and they really don’t seem to want to give other classes more complex options.

                    DND isn’t designed well. It’s the Harry Potter of RPGs. Also the JavaScript.