• Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    4 hours ago

    …and then your fun, completely apolitical story has stuff like “one of the main characters tries to end slavery and is ridiculed by the narrative for it

    • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 hours ago

      And don’t worry, if some of your readers are so strongly anti-slavery that they think the book is ridiculing the characters ridiculing the anti-slavery character, you can host a guest post on your blog explaining that it’s supposed to be pro-slavery and anyone getting any other message is wrong.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      if you read potter assuming the narrator is not only unreliable but also sleep-deprived and slightly drunk, in makes a lot more sense. it also makes rowling’s unhinged lore additions from twitter, like how wizards just used to shit on the floor until plumbing came along, slot in nicely with established facts, like how a hundreds-of-years old building would have a huge network of secret tunnels in the bathrooms. it goes from incongruous to “whos- who’s telling thiss story, you or me? shhhutup.”