Oh boy, I can’t wait to read a very levelheaded comments section
Alternative ending: “Now pull down your pants in front of this camera so we can use an AI algorithm to identify your gender. Don’t worry, the software is approved by the govonment and the pictures are processed by secure servers… Few days layer news headline: Big data breach, thousands of secure photos leaked”
Basically same as age verification photo scans at this point.
I wonder… are genitals just as suitable for identification as faces or irises?
Theoretically yes, they are supposed to be as uniquely shaped in finer details as the finger print on each of your fingertips, because of the nature of the ontological process in which they were formed when you were a developing fetus.
Well theoretically anyway, I’m not sure if there’s any study that’s already done where someone actually tried to verify if that’s actually true in reality. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if it is true though.
I know it’s true of both ears and anuses, but I haven’t seen any studies about genitals. At a guess I’d think they’re too flippy-floppy for you to be able to reliably identify enough landmarks to use as unique identifiers.
I guest that just makes for an even worse case for face scans than genitals scans. But if genitals scans are linked with name and address (because of cause they would be right) Im not sure what is worse then.
LMAO I guess at least genital scan would have the upside that people can’t easily take a scan of it without your active authorization, because everybody keep their genital covered at all time, and laws preventing attempts to “scan” it without authorization is strictly enforced. Whereas facial scans can be done by anyone in a public space without any authorization and consent.
But it does still have the same downside as facial scan, that if your genital scan data does get leaked you can’t just replace your genitals like you could replace a compromised password lol
Who are you, the Female Body Inspectors?!
Pizzacake the well documented misandrist? Why?
I’m pretty sure it’s not men, it’s just men exactly like you
You would lose that bet.
I have you tagged “the reason women choose the bear” over your behavior the last time that came up - you have a long long history of being an incel and claiming any criticism of a man is criticism of all men, which you’re doing yet again in this thread.
Just found out Boost also has this feature. Neat.
I do wish it was innate to lemmy like it is in piefed so they’d (theoretically?) carry over between mobile and web, but yeah it’s very nice.
Does voyager app have this tag feature?
Yes. Long press a username and it’ll bring up a menu that allows you to create a tag
I think so… but also PieFed has it innately.
What? Where? How? App or web UI?
PieFed offers user tagging in both its web UI and in the API so that any app using it could pull from them, although regarding the latter I am not sure which ones actually do or not (Mlwm reportedly does, surely I would think that Blorp would as it touts itself as offering greatest compatibility with PieFed, etc.).
I’m told it does, though I don’t use it personally so I’m not sure how it works thru that app.
What a random mischaracterization, feels like I’ve been mistaken for somebody. Theres really nothing to even respond to, here, except point out ad hominem.
Criticism of a person’s behavior when that’s the subject at hand is not an ad homeniem, it’s the argument. You’ve got a long history of misapplying logical fallacies and taking these sorts of commentaries where a man is portrayed negatively incredibly personally and then poorly defending your claims.
For example: elsewhere in this thread, where you’ve refused to back up your claims that the author is a “well documented” misandrist. If it’s well documented, it should not be a burden for you to provide evidence, and yet you refuse repeatedly.
Criticism of the criticism of a person’s behavior, via attacking the person and not the argument, is Ad Hominem, and also Whataboutism.
I’m directly criticizing two separate things: your behavior, and your claim that pizzacake is a well documented misandrist. That your behavior is remarkably predictable around these issues doesn’t invalidate your claim; we get the conclusion that your claim is baseless from the way you refuse to support it.
Neither of those are an ad hominem or a whattaboutism, and you would be well served by finding out what those terms represent before you try and defend yourself with them.
deleted by creator
For the most part I like lemmy, but the community is incredibly incel-heavy. One of the most successful forms of bait on here (besides political trolling) is posting any even slightly contentious topic about women’s experiences in society or things like institutional sexism. Seriously, keep an eye out - it’s depressingly predictable.
She’s made multiple comics making fun of men’s mental health issues, she very much seems to have it in for men in general.
Having scrolled through a couple years of her comics just to see for myself I think she’s mostly just anti-MAGA and occasionally overshoots a little into common men’s issues she has a blind spot for.
I don’t think she’s misandrist she’s just not perfect.
It’s particularly ironic as OP was the one making a song and dance about wanting all comics from bigoted artists banned the other day.
With Jago it was really simple. Someone put the bigoted comics in the comments and it was really easy to see they were bigoted.
With PizzaCake it’s a whole thing! The people who don’t like her refuse to give any evidence. It’s almost like the evidence doesn’t exist.
I remember one comic of hers was pretty tone deaf and caused a bit of a stir:
Not sure how to find it, but it was supposed to be a “imagine if women acted like this to men” as a way to point out problematic behaviors men have, but instead of picking things that never happen to men for the point to land she used things that actually already happen to men. This showed she was apparently unaware the reversal was true instead of ridiculous which, yikes.
That’s the only thing I’m aware of though so not sure about “well documented”. Maybe there’s some social media posts that people didn’t like or something? That’s as much light as I can shed on the situation.
I think this is the one.
https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1dpptkk/talk/
I get what she’s aiming at but it’s a complete miss in my opinion. Men absolutely get mocked for all of those issues.
The getting robbed reaction is also true of men who’ve been raped or sexually assaulted.
I’m not convinced she’s a full on misandrist but she’s had some bad takes. Hard not to have some misses when you’ve made that much content.
it’s well documented?
use a search engine
or go ask her yourself, she will gladly verify for us
i only found recipe results for pizza cake and i have no interest in reaching out to her on whatever other social media platform im not on
Skill Issue
reddit, knowyourmeme, and … kiwiframs!
You, Sir*, just played yourself
* not gendered
so all the reddit threads had nothing of value then i started reading the kiwifarms forum post then i realised i don’t give a shit
Are you said this comic shows misandry? Or just the artist in general?
The artist in general, she is a particularly hateful individual who fights against equality.
Are you taking her anti trump comics to be anti men? Your search screenshot in a different thread was just for controversy, not misandry as you initially claimed. I’ve seen several pro lgbt comics from her, so saying she’s anti equality seems disingenuous.
No, I’m taking her anti-men comics to be anti-men. The multiple posts she made on men’s health month and the many posts and comments about male sexual assault victims. It’s really easy to search this up, you don’t have to sit here and ask me about it.
Can you link to some of these comics?
misandry doesn’t real
Let’s assume for the sake of discussion that you’re correct.
If a woman hates men, usually it’s for a damn good reason.
Wusha…
Having frequent or traumatic experiences with members of a group is not a good reason to hate that group at all unless it’s actually the group’s defining feature directly causing it, and it’s their own choice.
That’s different to suffering from trauma as a result, which obviously you can’t control, and might result in some behaviour that looks similar on the surface.
“Sexism is sometimes okay.”
You rn
Sexism is sometimes OK. Like in sport. If women’s sport didn’t exist they would have no chance to compete. Should we get rid of women’s sports because it’s sexist?
Your behavior in this thread is proving me right.
So one case in a niche forum is proving you right about all men? Sounds like sexism.
she is but i still like this comic
and i do look at the art more than the artist
Well I generally avoid people like her, Kanye West, Stonetoss, etc.
deleted by creator
You can always rely on Pizzacake to bring a nuanced and informed take to a given topic, rather than simply making a strawman argument.
The problem is when you represent TERFs the way they represent themselves, they lie. It’s not Pizza Cake’s fault that an honest TERF is a strawman.
trust me. I’m a professional sexing agent with the USDOHS.
