• edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 minutes ago

    Not sure this fully qualifies as a perverse incentive or malicious compliance, but it tickles my schadenfreude sense all the same

  • uuj8za@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I need to start doing this… I think I recently got flagged for not using AI enough…

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Yeah I can see the temptation. Ai usage is part of my kpis and is the one place I got dinged on my review. I thought i was insulated as a “partly coding” position, but they put me against full time coders so I look even worse

    I guess they’re trying to force change, make us figure out how to make it work. The skeptic in me thinks it rewards people who have time to screw around, but when I set aside a week to see what I can do, I did increase my ai use.

    I did find some useful tasks that also increase my “agentic” score! But my “quality” score (ai generated lines I accept) is stick at zero. We currently pay a flat fee but that’s changing next months to pay per token

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    At least luddites broke the machines in their protest.

    Feeding machines to get a pat on the head from the bosses is seriously fucked.

    I guess anyone working for ‘meta’ was already a cunt to start with though.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Feeding machines to get a pat on the head from the bosses is seriously fucked.

      If the tokens are the company’s property and not yours, I guess it’s no different from paying for things with play money. (Or maybe the fake money they burn for the dead in China would be a better analogy.)

  • brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    All this time I assumed destroying the world was just an easily dismissed, unfortunate consequence, turns out it’s their main objective after all.

  • limdaepl@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Most people have learned by now, that “lines of code“ is a terrible metric for evaluating productivity. Why are we doing the exact same thing with AI tokens now?

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Because middle manglement has a constant compulsive need to justify their existence by finding new ways and metrics to “manage”.

    • Slaxis@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m no developer, just so some casual scripting for my job, but lines of code being a performance metric is a hilarious notion. Like, the indicator of good code is that it’s efficiently written in a small number of lines. It’s similarly just as easy to waste tokens on nothing of value.

  • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Not surprising at all. Every worker everywhere does this if they have some sort of ‘tokens’ they need to consume. Helpdesk ticket count is one pretty common with IT-folks and it’s easy enough to boost if you just write one from every single small thing you’ve done for the day.

    None of these obviously are beneficial for the actual work getting done, but as the game is ‘make KPI numbers look good’ then that’s exactly what gets done.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Exactly. I’m not helpdesk anymore, thank god, but my team still has a ton of day to day work that’s tracked in the ticketing system.

      Well, for years I’ve been stuck in project hell, doing work that isn’t easily fit into the ticket system. My last review my boss said I had only closed about 1/3 of the tickets of the next lowest person on my team, and that it doesn’t matter except we have a new exec watching that shit, so I have to make it look better.

      So the next project I got, I chose to do something manually that I could have automated, that required the help desk to open tickets direct to me about 2-4 times a day whenever someone new needed access to the system I was setting up, until the project was done.

      A week in I automated the “manual” task anyway and had a bunch of tickets I could close with a copy-pasted resolution.

      I would feel bad, but my co-workers game the metrics even worse than I do.

  • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    AI going from ‘It’ll make everything so much more efficient!’ to deliberately doing everything as inneficiently as possible is just… idk beyond even satire at this point.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    maxxing

    It’s ‘maxing’. It’s like ‘faxing’, ‘taxing’, or ‘relaxing’. Here’s your tree.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Am doing something related at work as we got the directive to actively use AI, so I might as well use the best model available, which happens to be very expensive. It’s also not so smart for our work so I have to kick it multiple times… What can I do, it’s part of my performance objectives now.