Tankies keep posting “NATO-backed Zionists” on the comm. It’s completely delusional because China, Russia, India, etc. all support Zionism as well. I was banned for pointing this out. I knew I was going against tankie narratives so I’m not surprised. It’s still pretty pathetic. Tankies literally value their alt-empire over actual meaningful anti-zionism.

FWIW I’m not especially anti-tankie either. I consider them the same as libs. People who are def better than fash but not necessarily allies.

  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s completely delusional because China, Russia, India, etc. all support Zionism as well.

    If China really supports Zionism, then why does it send satellite intel to Iran that Iran then uses to bomb US bases with cruise missiles? The actual Zionist countries send intel to the Zionist entity.

    At worst, you can say that China plays both sides. But that doesn’t mean China supports Zionism on an ideological level. And since it contributes to both Zionist and anti-Zionist countries, one has to weigh its Zionist contributions versus its anti-Zionist contributions.

    Of note is that none of the openly anti-Zionist countries and parties (the Axis of Resistance) has condemned China for being pro-Zionist. I think I’ll trust the judgment of people who actually liquidated Zionists over people whose “anti-Zionist” praxis amounts to nothing more than useless protests that nobody cares about and useless articles that nobody reads.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m always kinda torn when someone on .ml pulls that kind of excessive cherry picking. It’s absolutely bullshit, and it meets the casual definition of power tripping via artificially and arbitrarily curating an echo chamber, with bans being a symptom of that rather than their own separate piece of trippin

    So, yeah, PTB.

    But, I think anyone going there for much of anything should know at this point that it’s inevitable. Any mention of politics that don’t support the echo are going to eventually get banned, be it temporary or permanent. Going to a community that’s based around a particularly hot button subject/location and not toeing the groupthink line, well, what would anyone expect? It’s almost asking for it. It approaches baiting. It isn’t there only by virtue of how absurdly thin skinned the reactions are, but anyone doing it has to know that a ban is incoming at some point.

    • Yeah, when I do end up on ml or similar I very well know what I’m getting myself into, since I am disrupting an echo chamber. I’ve been banned twice, IIRC, but I didn’t even remotely bother posting it here because I know that it’s power tripping, it’s not even a question. If anything, it provides some fun for tankiejerk or meanwhileongrad.

    • mrdown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t like the echo chember argument. For example ukraine sub will rightfully remove anything from tankis regarding the war of agression russia started.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Why though? What’s the benefit of this?

        Tankies are mostly wrong about everything but occasionally they make a good point. These ideological bannings are pointless and create harmful echo chambers.

        I’m OK with it if you’re creating a highly curated space where only sourced, factual information is permitted but that requires a lot of work and I’ve never seen it done on Lemmy.

        • mrdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          You don’t need to be so knowledgeable or do long research to know that Russia is the agressor

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Obviously but I guess I’m just saying people are wrong about a lot of things a lot of the time and I think a ban is a really excessive response to that.

              • mrdown@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                The connection is the idea of echo chambers . Just because certain views are not allowed it doesn’t it necessarly an echo chembers. One example is the ukraine sub it will not allow russian propaganda

                • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  So you went on a tangent. Fair enough.

                  But I wasn’t speaking in general, I am aware that curation and moderation are useful things. If you’ll go back, my initial comment led off with a sentence that specified .ml.

                  They create echo chambers on a regular basis, and do so using methodology that falls under “power trippin”.

                  But, back to your tangent about general echo chambers. I would partially agree with you. It is necessary to play gatekeeper when you moderate any community. Part of that is minimizing conflict. Since some communities are going to draw extra heat by virtue of being a hot topic, a moderator may have to deploy aggressive filtering, to the point of outright rejection of some types of comments.

                  That may or may not result in an echo chamber. But it can, and does if the moderator isn’t very judicious in their application of that tool set

  • their inhumane genocide vs our enlightened ethnic management.

    campists gonna camp. anyone who abandons class solidarity based upon the nationality of the oppressor isn’t a particularly well-read communist. 😂

  • mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not to nato level. China and russia are complicit because of trade but the west and nato back them with weapons and diolomatic protection. I am no tankie snd I believe russia is the agressor but yesh nato back up israel colonization

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Just heads up dbzer0 is getting closer to .ml levels of delusion everyday so watch out when you’re posting about zionists or tankies here too.