The products covered by the obligation to repair currently include:

  • washing machines and washer-dryers
  • dishwashers
  • refrigerators
  • electronic displays
  • welding equipment
  • servers and data storage products
  • mobile phones, cordless phones and tablets
  • tumble dryers
  • e-bikes and e-scooters batteries (from 18 February 2027)
  • local space heaters
  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 minutes ago

    Also, more and more products will let you know until when they guarantee production of spare parts (it’s also driven by regulation of course).

  • Miaou@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’m noticing cars are not part of the list, despite being smartphones on wheels

  • UninvestedCuriosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Thank you E.U. I hope you have a run of people buying and shipping products all over the world and it pressures everyone else to follow suit.

    • Maroon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      Phones still have replaceable batteries? I have a Google Pixel 8. How do I even open that thing let alone replace the battery?

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      49 minutes ago

      Why is bicycle on the list? A bicycle is the epitome of repairability.

      Edit: it got enshittified?

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        43 minutes ago

        It’s red because there’s nothing forcing bike manufacturers to continue down the path of repairability and outside of the enthusiast community, people might not care much, they’ll just buy what’s cheaper.

      • picnic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        60 minutes ago

        I take it you never heard Van Moof bricked bikes afteir their bankcruptcy?

        Edit: and thinking about ebike motors and their parts - bosch has locked down their engines real hard

      • polle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Did you ever repair a bike? Its like every model has its own special tools that you need to get Something unscrewed or pulled of. (You can buy them, though)

    • rose56@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes espresso, especially the well known ones(gaggia, rocket, rancilio). They can be repaired!

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Well thing is this is not about whether the items are currently repairable, but whether laws require them to be.

        At the moment there’s nothing stopping some dipshit from coming up with parts locks on espresso machines the way John Deere does them.

  • freebee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have a super common type (in EU) of Philips water kettle. It’s a reliable machine. Unfortunately the little filter “screen” for the pouring sprout is starting to break now, after many many years of use. I can’t find a replacement. It’s a super easy to manufacture part, must be a very common “breaking thing” on this widespread device… Nope.

    Philips HD4646 if anyone knows a source 🙈

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Nice! I didn’t find anything. I consider buying it even overpriced, it’s mainly about avoiding buying another one just because if this

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Maybe there’s a fab shop by you that could print the part? Or a local enthusiasts group or something? Never used one so no idea of price but small part, prob not too expensive. I guess finding the part spec would be the challenge. Maybe they can scan the broken one or something. I actually have no clue about 3d printing so this may not be a helpful suggestion 🤷

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It can be, but is a hassle. There are food safe filaments, there are filaments that “should be” safe, like unmodified PETG, but the issue is to make all parts that are in contact with the filament food safe; extruder gears, Bowden tubes and other guides, hot ends, etc…

          I imagine that it would be a hassle for parts suppliers to certify the bajillion variations of these parts as food safe.

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 hour ago

            The filaments themselves may be food safe but that doesn’t matter. The resulting object is not food safe not because of the material but because of the manufacturing process. Printing layer by layer leaves miniscule voids and holes in-between layers where bacteria can thrive and which are impossible to clean.

            Your print is safe to eat out of the first time, but is never food safe again as it can never be cleaned from bacteria in all the thin holes.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That “should be” is a risk…
            I (probably but very likely) have enough micro plastics in my body. Don’t need to supply it with a nuclear blast of it.
            Rather buy a close enough replacement from a reputable brand or buy a better kettle for the next time (sadly).

            • Jako302@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 minutes ago

              The microplastic is the least important point when it comes to food safe products. Sure microplastic is bad, and we have no real idea about the long term effects, but there are there are things that already have effects on your health in the short term:

              A lot of different plastic types release actual toxins over time, especially when exposed to high heat, since that destroys the molecular bonds. Having food or water touch these toxins is a great way to absord them into your body.

              Apart from that most 3D printed materials have micro ridges and air pockets that are the perfect place for bacteria to grow. That’s probably the worst thing to have in your kitchen.

  • jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Heh, the dryer stopped working at home and my spouse was bracing to buy a new one. So nice to break out the multimeter, find the issue, and 10 dollar part later, good as new.

    Think of all the waste avoided by repairing a tiny part in a gigantic appliance.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Today I repaired my toothbrush after my room mate suggested buying another one that is cheaper than mine amd the same brand as theirs.
      Looked up the model, iFixIt manual available, opened it, tightened the screw on the vibrating head for the motor and put it back together.
      Working flawlessly again and 50-75€ (or even more) saved.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah this could be great. Part of my job involves clearing up fly tip, dumped rubbish, and a shit load of it is electric appliances. Most people don’t know how to use a multimeter, but you only need to know someone who does.

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Pleeeeeeeease, European companies sell your products that comply with this in Australia!

    • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      i mean, you should be able to somehow get the product by buying it in the EU and shipping it to australia yourself. not sure how practical that would be, however.

      you’d have to pay the shipping fee yourself and probably also get some re-seller that is willing to buy the product from within the EU and ship it to anywhere else in the world. maybe there could even be a specialized re-seller for this?

  • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Interesting things that are not on the list:

    • Farming equipment
    • Motor and electric vehicles
    • Computers (including laptops)
    • Video game consoles
    • HVAC systems and equipment

    Not sure if smart TVs fall under “electronic displays”, or if they just mean commercial displays when they say that.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Broken ports, replace hard drive, replace memory, no software locks so custom software can keep it alive, replace battery (on a Switch for example).

        Lots of thing right to repair could do for consoles.

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          I would hope that the Switch falls under “Tablets”. Because that’s exactly what it is.

      • picnic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        56 minutes ago

        Well how about mobile phone, laptop or a tablet?

        I’m not seeing easy written anywhere, it can still be done by experts but the idea I feel would be that its overall possible to accomplish by a third party.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        Video consoles are either desktop computers with proprietary parts, or tablets with proprietary parts. There is nothing especially difficult to repair in them compared to the rest of their categories.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Considering the videos on youtube about creators disassembling and modifying them and the warnings creators like styropyro and The king of random did…I don’t think they should be serviced by the regular joe. Or the dangerous parts should be sealed of from the boring stuff like the buttons (e.g. door opener) so one trained technicians can reach it but the hurdle is big enough for normies.

    • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Farming equipment is a particularly annoying one, that and construction vehicles, are becoming increasingly locked down by proprietary software and impossible to maintain yourself. You can’t even employ mechanics outside the dealer network in some instances and it will be more so in the future.

    • BeatL@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      11 hours ago

      not yet ! we hope !

      John deer tractor lost a case that became famous in my rural area (and elsewhere). It now have to let repair shop acces the tools and allow repair on its tractors.

      I take the win ! And we continue to push forward in talks, petitions, actions and repairs (autorised or else) Support and/or use open source.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hopefully this will benefit other countries indirectly, instead of designing one repairable phone and one not repairable, should be easier to just design one.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      So I saw that my car offered up all sorts of useful diagnostic information for self diagnosing stuff. Was very excited and went to look at it for a generic fault without having to get software to tell me what the fault is. I thought "it’s stupid it has fully functional computer display yet tells me basically “contact a dealer, but it’s safe to drive” instead of what the problem is. Then I find out that because I’m in the USA, the company keeps it to themselves…

      So if they see value in treating regions differently, they will absolutely go out of their way to screw over the regions that will let them.

      • hikaru755@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Okay, but the economics of doing that are different between software and hardware. It’s much more expensive to have a full second hardware design compared to just turning a software feature off in certain markets.

      • freebee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Car manufacturers screwed over consumers the last 10-15 years big time! Cars used to be the big thing many could fix a lot on by themselves and were proud to do so. Then they basically just said incrementally to the DIY’ers “it’s all computers now, not your cup of tea”, purposely made cars less and less self repairable and got away with it! It’s infuriating.

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          Computers could make cars a lot more reliable and moddable. It’s proprietary/locked-down software and hardware that’s the problem.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Do you seriously think they computerized cars to make them less repairable? That’s some tin foil hat stuff there.

          They started computerizing cars to make them more efficient, reliable (ironically), safer, etc. The problem is that beyond OBDII there is no standard for diagnostics, and makers keep these proprietary.

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            29 minutes ago

            They didn’t have to keep it proprietary, and I think in many “computer problems” the certified dealers will just replace 1 circuitboard by a new one, but it’s a part which private customers are not able to order and replace themselves

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            31 minutes ago

            They didn’t do it for that purpose, I am saying they used the opportunity of cars becoming more digital to make them less repairable outside of “certified dealers”

        • Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Exactly, repairing your car was even a very common trope in Home Improvement, which kind of catched the average American household of that time pretty well, or so at least to TVs best abilities to generalize

      • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, I get the impression newer cars are designed to fail just outside warranty because the car companies make more on the dealerships repairs then they do on the sale of the car.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      119
      ·
      14 hours ago

      “Hold my beer” - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision. Meanwhile Apple and Samsung are digging up every legal loophole to prevent the law applying to their devices.

      • gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        “Hold my beer” - Nintendo, releasing an EU centric revision.

        i wonder, do we know what will be the price difference between the EU centric version and the international version?

      • IllNess@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Apple and Samsung be like: “It’s not a mobile phone or a tablet, it’s a phablet so it does not fall in to any category of the devices that need to be repairable.”

        • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          The loophole in the directive is smaller phones. Smartphones go from 10.16 cm (4 inches) diagonal to 17. 78cm (7 inches) and everything bigger (up to 44.2 cm) is a tablet.

          Samsung and Apple’s flagship smartphones are very close to be considered tablets but that wouldn’t save them from the requirements.

      • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        iPhones are already super easy to repair. Apple have been at the forefront of this for years.

        For the downvoters who are too blinded by their hate for Apple to believe facts:

        https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

        PROS
        • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
        • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
        • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
        CONS
        • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.
        • pwalker@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I have to admit that I haven’t checked ifix scores for a hot minute and am surprised that since the iphone 15 Apple consistently beats all other big brands in reparability score. Before that of course they were bad, which is probably why people remember them that way. I like that trend, hopefully Samsung and Google also hop on that bandwaggon any time soon.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Strange that 73 other people, 30+ of who downvoted long after I added the proof, think that ifixit are wrong.

        • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          74
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Are we talking about the same apple that invented a new type of screw to keep people from taking their phones apart? The same apple that once people could get a trilobe driver, then made it so that generic replacement screens would not work because of some protection from non-apple hardware? Then went on to make sure that you can’t use non-apple parts in a laptop?

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Same Apple. Signing new parts to your device is incredibly simple and DIY now.

            https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

            PROS
            • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
            • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
            • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
            CONS
            • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.
              • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                I wouldn’t want to be putting second hand parts in my phone when repairing it. I can’t imagine there are many second hand screens or batteries around for sale given they’re the things that are replaced the most.

                Not that I’d ever want a second hand screen or battery anyway.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            At home with minimal tool requirements

            https://www.ifixit.com/repairability/smartphone-repairability-scores

            PROS
            • Display and battery repairs are well-prioritized, though not as well as in other (dual-entry) iPhone models.
            • Torx screws secure the battery assembly in place, making replacements straightforward.
            • Repair parts and instructions are available straight from Apple.
            CONS
            • Five different screwhead types and the continued reliance on adhesives complicate basic repairs.

            Company that rates self repairability of phones: iPhones are easy to repair by yourself using basic tools

            Lemmy: no, that can’t be true because we hate apple

            • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Not bad by the standards of modern phones, but hopefully not good enough for the new EU standards. Imo adhesives should only be used if they’re replaceable or reusable and the screws should be limited to philips and flatheads.

              • 9bananas@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 hours ago

                hard disagree on the screws:

                philps and flatheads can be damaged too easily: torx or nothing!

                these teeny tiny screws are really finicky and both philips and flatheads are prone to slipping, causing faster wear and easily leading to stripped screws…

                any design that is inherently resistant to that is a must for small parts!

                source: worked in a repair shop ;)

                • testaccount372920@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  45 minutes ago

                  Sure thing, I don’t care much about the specific screw type, just that it’s a type that’s commonly available so you don’t need a unique screwdriver for each device you own.

              • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                No thank you on the flathead or Philips head screws, they get burred too easily which would basically leave your phone unrepairable.

                The less adhesives the better though, agreed there. Their phones are already definitely self-repairable enough for the new EU rules.

          • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Edited to add the single best source there is for the doubters and downvoters. Take a look.

            You only need a screwdriver set and maybe some rubbing alcohol.

    • farmgineer@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’ve read a couple stories of companies (planning to) release EU-only models there, but non-EU-compliant ones everywhere else.

    • lemmygarden@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The past two phones I bought were not because they broke, but because they stopped being supported on apps that I need to use.

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s also included in the directive. Manufactures will be required to provide OS updates for at least 5 years “from the date of end of placement on the market” (which means the date the brand shipped the last device of a model).

        They also have 4 months to release security updates and 6 months for functionality updates see ANNEX II for all device categories.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That is actually fairly reasonable. I use a 5 yr old Xiaomi which a has 8Gb (as much as an entry level Surface or MacBook. Fuck AI) an octacore CPU, great camera, ultra fast charge, great battery etc. But I realize most people change phones every 2-3 years regardless of how well their phone works, because of “shiny new thing”

          • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Source?

            As far as I know, nearly all flagship phones, Apple or otherwise, get about 7 years of update support (except Pixel phones with GrapheneOS which get 14 ignore; I remembered this incorrectly).

            The difference is, even my old phone running Android 8 (a 9yo OS) can still browse the web, run all apps, and perform fine as a phone. An even older phone running Android 4.4 can still run 3rd party apps. iPhones seem to stop working about a year after they stop receiving updates, and they don’t support sideloading (also know as running the software you want to run on the device you own).

          • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Huh…I’m guessing banking apps? Those are the only ones that have ever given me problems on old Android devices

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Been starting to see more randomly picky apps. Based on vintage and rooted device.

              Uninstalled the FedEx app, since every time I tapped on a tracking number, it would divert to the app which would promptly shame me for having a rooted device and refuse to run.

  • Einhornyordle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Great in theory until companies start charging 80% of the product price for a single spare part so you’d rather buy a new product than try to repair your existing one.

    • blackbeans@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is also mentioned in the directive, and directives are legislative texts. The price may not be set so high as to deter repair.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Depends on how it’s done. If they have to make schematics and binaries available, it’s different than having to provide parts at whatever cost they’d like.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s a good start.

    Pisses me off that laws are required for this, but that’s what we get for being ruled by the Epstein Class.

  • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    13 hours ago

    This is good.

    The RIGHT to repair does you no good if the thing itself is not DESIGNED to be repaired.