• trebach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The Autumn Wind is a people
    Struggling to be free
    With a phone and car, they see quite far
    And trackers all they see

    Their bodies are well covered
    And no one sees their faces
    With lasers, saws, and power tools
    Put fascists in their places

    They go across the country
    To knock down one by one
    Care not to see just where they be
    For this is not for fun

    The Autumn Wind is a people
    Who want to be alone
    No one should know just where they go
    Or what is on their phone

  • altphoto@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    By the time this is over you’re gonna have to look back when you’re backing up.

    Darn! My wife is gonna be pissed and I’m gonna have to reinstall that camera.

  • laranis@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    12 hours ago

    What would cause fire like that? Assume it is an internal lithium-based battery?

  • VoodooMischief@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Most of these cameras are traffic cameras. Personally I’m finding it a little gross that people against traffic cameras are putting on an anti-surveillance state image to take them down when in reality curbing aggressive driving is a pretty important part of pedestrianizing and democratizing urban centres. I’ve always had the vague feeling that this Flock camera debate has been hijacked by people who don’t actually care for improving communities.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      The correct way to fix aggressive driving is traffic calming. In other words, making physical changes to the infrastructure, like removing lanes, lane-narrowing, adding speed humps or chicanes, etc.

      As (a) a traffic engineer, (b) a bicycle and pedestrian activist, and (c) a mod of !fuckcars@lemmy.world, I find it downright insulting to be accused of “[not] actually car[ing] for improving communities” just because I also care about not creating a motherfucking totalitarian panoption!

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Honestly everything around here is about cherished narratives.

      But you do create an interesting tension between two cherished narratives:

      1. cars are evil
      2. surveillance cameras are evil

      I think number 2 is just winning out.

    • CubitOom@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A network of “traffic cameras” might include other sensors than a camera.

      The 24/7 monitoring of an intersection outside of an abortion clinic might be used to find women that had an abortion.

      Police and others with access do abuse these systems for personal use with minimal oversight.

      • VoodooMischief@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Again, I’m not debating the problems with surveillance for non traffic related issues. However these examples in your video are very clearly traffic cameras. It does not help the issue to carry water for aggressive car driver culture in the guise of being anti-surveillance.

        • valar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          You may be misinformed; The flock cameras in this video are not just traffic cameras but in fact are tracking everyone’s location all the time in a national database in a way that violates the 4th amendment.