• Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    President Camacho was far more qualified to be a leader than the sack of vomit you lot decided to elect twice.

    • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Seriously, this is slander to a great man. Camacho not only seeks out the most qualified person he can find, he willingly steps aside to let him lead when he’s proved right.

  • pticrix@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 hours ago

    But… giving everyone free money, that’s COMMUNISM!
    The Red TACO strikes again, mimicking his role model : Kim Jong-Un.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Camacho saw his people had problems, he searched for the smartest man in the world, found him, and empowered him to make real change.

        That’s not something politicians do, for that you need an idiot.

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Infinitely of better character. Comancho didn’t know any better. And he learned better.

      This president is a complete piece of shit by character. Not a fraction of a percent of goodness in him. Doesn’t even like dogs. His redeeming quality is his arrogance and stupidity that leaves him unable to achieve his callous goals.

  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Surely everyone can see this is a lie? And if it isn’t, then it’s got to be illegally paying for votes. I can just see the SC ruling - ‘everyone should have known he was lying, so it doesn’t count as corruption’

    • starik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah, even MAGA isn’t buying this one. It just reminds them of the promised $2000 DOGE checks they never saw.

    • elbucho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      It’s a clear violation of 18 USC 597: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/597

      Couple of interesting things about this: this covers both the supply side and the demand side of the bribe economy; it’s illegal to offer the bribe, and illegal to accept it. Both are punishable for up to 2 years imprisonment per count. So if the US actually were a nation of laws, that would mean approximately 360 million years of prison for the fat orange traitor, and up to 2 years in prison for everybody who votes Republican thinking they’re going to get $5,000 for it.

      Of course, we’re not a nation of laws. Clearly. I mean, Trump has violated the law pretty much every single day (sometimes multiple times per day) that he’s been in office, and nothing negative has happened to him. We’ve all just accepted that our president is a traitor, and that’s just the way things are.

    • DokPsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think they’ve made very clear that they use the Nixon rule. If the president does it, it’s not illegal

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        We are way past that, we are on to the might makes right rule.

        Who is going to stop them? That is the only question that matters to these super-villain gangsters that seized control of the US.

        I was hoping at least for like a Scorpio type from the simpsons when that happened, but there is still time.

    • Yew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Why does it need to be a lie? It conveniently is more money than anyone on SSI is supposed to have in their bank account, automatically resulting in kicking everyone off that program for having too much money.

  • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It’s already my money, asshole, where do you think it came from in the first place?

    Also, I’d rather have healthcare for all and robust social safety nets, which are far more valuable than a paltry one time 5k payment that he’ll weasel out of.

    • Just doing some quick napkin math, the $5k payouts would cost around $1.25 trillion, pretty much guarantee at least 4 more years of no Medicare for All, and lead to absolutely no systemic change. M4A is estimated to cost anywhere from $2.5-$3 trillion per year. So yeah, he’s almost certainly lying but also even if not it’s a huge bargain for the oligarch class.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Who wants to bet he pulled that number out of his ass, without checking with anyone, or looking into if they even can?

        • Mannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Why would he check if they can do it, he has no intention of actually doing it, he probably picked it because it sounds good

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Man what I would give for a Comancho ticket in 2028. We couldn’t ask for better at this point.