• shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    181
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Comes off racist if youre scared to use the word black for describing the color of a thing to someone who is black. Black isnt a bad word but you’re thinking of its negative connotations applied to people by racists.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I agree, but also black for coffee isn’t just describing the color. It’s describing the character. Sugar doesn’t change the color, but that isn’t black coffee. Black for coffee is a label/category, not a description.

      It’s still stupid to be scared to call it black, just as it’s stupid to be scared of calling black people black. It’s a common term that everyone understands, and it isn’t an insult.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Calling a black object “black” = Does not offend.

      Calling your car’s late ignition timing “retarded” = Does not offend.

      Calling your dog a “bitch” = Does not offend.

      Calling your rooster a “cock” = does not offend.

      Calling a tied bundle of sticks for burning a “removed” = Does not offend.

      Just follow your friendly dictionary and you’ll be fine.

      Also: Hi mods. You’re probably here because of your word filter.

      Edit: Something replaced “f-a-g-g-o-t” with “removed” automatically. I’m going to leave it because it’s hilarious that bundled sticks are forbidden.

        • Logi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s literally fascist propaganda. Fasces is Latin for a bundle of sticks and that was the image of strength that Italian fascists were trying to evoke.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Oh, so there is an automated censoring system in place. I thought people were saying removed en lieu of re-tard on Lemmy on whichever instance I was visiting. Kind of like how people use unalive.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I don’t think it’s Lemmy. I think it’s per-instance. Lemmy.world is not a great or open place. They’re very close to Reddit, with way too much control over Lemmy where it’s almost synonymous. Take this as a warning if you’re creating a community or new account to spread things out.

        • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Its basically never used in a legitimate way unless youre a british smoker or something, and even then you are likely aware of the slur.

          Kindling or whatever the other word im blanking on is would likely be more appropriate

          “Hey can you grab me that F____?” Would mentally auto correct to “Hey, can you grab me that, F_____?” In my brain

      • nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ehhh, context and tone can go a long way.

        In a neutral context, absolutely. I’ve heard people use saying it as an attack in some vile ways.

    • threeonefour@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Reminds me of The Office joke where Michael asks Oscar what his ethnicity is and Oscar says “Mexican” and Michael says “There’s gotta be a better word to use than that”.

      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Also the bit in 30 Rock.

        “It’s not because you’re a… uh, what do you call yourself?”

        “A Puerto Rican.”

        “No, I know you can say that, but what do I call you?”

        “A Puerto Rican.”

        “Wow… that does not sound right.”

    • noob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 hours ago

      So decades ago I worked at a bike shop and some college students came in. One of them was black, everyone else in the shop was white. She sat down on a bike, that was all black with dark grey lettering. And I said “this bike looks great, I love the black on black look.” Everyone looked at me funny, she immediately got off the bike, and i literally died inside and froze up.

      20 years later and i still think about this.

      Also I should note that it was not the first time I used that phrase for that bike - when you work sales you end up with little automatic narratives that you barely think about.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I think the crack about Spanish is because the Spanish word for “black” is “negro.” But it is also not pronounced the same way as racist southerners say it. Spanish uses a short E, where as rednecks insist on saying it “neeegro,” perhaps in the hopes that it’ll make them taller. So don’t do that.

      The peanut gallery will win no points for guessing that the origin of the n-word is a mutation and/or corruption of “negro” and its various permutations in the other Romance languages that white people were all dragging with them across the Atlantic, all of which are just the words for the color black. For instance, in Latin it’s the even closer “niger,” single G.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There is a long tradition of “black” being used to describe evil things, which may or may not be related to racism. I think being conscious of this can be useful, but black means a lack of light, and a black hole is something that light can’t escape from. It’s a perfect term for that.

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The implication I got from the comic imo is that the person is going to ridiculous lengths to appear anti-racist

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t know about the specific scenario in the comic, but it seems understandable to be afraid of being perceived as racist just because of how much of a touchy subject it is, if you aren’t able to be confident in knowing how what you say will be interpreted.

        • Saapas@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          To me it’s hard to see this comic without thinking we’re supposed to laugh at the ridiculousness of the person in it and not as much sympathize with his position

          • 5too@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I honestly think the intent is both. It’s funny because we can recognize it’s a bit ridiculous, and still see ourselves in that position