• Kiuyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 minutes ago

    This is why I don’t use GNOME apps on a tiling WM. They always have an absurd amount of padding.

  • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    don’t you just fucking love  
     
     
                                                   paddings!  
     
     

    (apologies to everyone whose device can’t render HTML entities)

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    7 hours ago

    the edits to charlie kirk’s face are so subtle these days, I can’t tell if this is the original or has been slightly modified.

    • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It had been so long since I’d seen his real face that I didn’t know how it actually looked like anymore. I saw a clip of him a few days ago and thought ‘oh, they aren’t changing it that much’

  • lmuel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I enjoy using Gnome and don’t really encounter any issues in my day to day use

    (pls don’t kill me :))

    • voodooattack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      I used to be a GNOME fanatic a couple of years ago. I switched to KDE after I got tired of the perpetually broken state of extensions.

      I’m still thankful for all the effort and commitment the GNOME devs have invested over the years though! It’s an excellent desktop environment!

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I don’t like using GNOME desktop or apps, but that’s not because its bad or less capable for my usage. I just don’t prefer their design philosophies. I’m grateful that it exists nonetheless. Linux desktop users are spoiled by how many great choices we have.

    • wer2@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t like Gnome, but I am glad it works for you. At the end of the day Gnome is better than Windows, Mac, and CDE.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Don’t forget:

      • Massive fucking fonts
      • No visual separation between UI elements
      • Hijacked scrolling
      • Everything shoved into animated menus
      • One (1) context action in the bottom right
    • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Counterargument:

      Admittedly this is a chat app, so there’s little to do. But still, it could stretch out a little bit more, maybe open the conversation info panel on the right

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Sounds like a skills issue/design decision. Like the devs could do otherwise, they just didn’t. There’s nothing in GTK preventing this from working properly.

      • bjorney@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That looks like it’s just wrapping a WebView, is it not?

        It looks like the CSS is just capping the container class width at 1440px, which has nothing to do with GTK

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Fair - point still stands though - the application only has a single breakpoint defined at 600sp from a cursory glance, the lack of an ultra-wide specific layout is just because it hasn’t been implemented rather than a shortfall of GTK (though I’m not sure you would even want to make the message view wider, as it would impair readability)

      • cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        What is your monitor size?

        (Edit)

        You see the app’s font size is on par with the text size of your KDE panel. If gnome increased it, it would look totally out of place.

        Also centering content is a valid design choice. Many websites do that on large/wide monitors. It improves readability. An example might be the design of pi-hole’s UI.

        If readability is your issue on gnome on wide screen monitors you should also have issue on reading the time and date on the KDE panel as well.

        • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          2560x1080 which is 21:9 full hd. Most programs don’t really handle 21:9 displays, but many GTK apps are particularly bad at it

        • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          (after edit)

          I have no issue with the text size, I have an issue with enormous empty space around the text. It’s fine if it’s not perfect on a 21:9 display, but this wouldn’t look good even on a 16:9 display.

          I’m also fine with the text not taking up the entire width, I aggre that it’s less readable. But I think the window (not the text, the window) could utilise the width better.

          I say that the messages could be a little more spread out (i.e. my massages could be a little to the right while other’s a little to the left) and just like the left sidepanel appears and disappears when the window is too thin, more sidebars could appear to the right when the window is very wide.

          • _stranger_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            These are all design choices though, not technical limitations of the gdk. I’m no expert in it though. Is it possible it’s missing the tools that make building those other design features easy?

            • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              AFAIK one of these are technical limitations, it’s just design choices. But in my experience, the design choices made following the gnome design guidelines tend to make apps with tiny faces

        • edinbruh@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          No, I want it to utilize the space a little bit more, this wouldn’t look good even on a 16:9 display. Which is a shame because when windowed it looks really good.

  • Phen@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Huh, this sort of issue is what made me leave KDE in the first place. Haven’t had such problems on gnome.

  • ter_maxima@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m having this problem on Android rn. Coming from iOS, the content density is just super low, and no amount of tweaking display/font size will fix it 🙁

    My screen is 50% padding now 🤷🏻‍♀️