Linux phones are still behind android and iPhone, but the gap shrank a surprising amount while I wasn’t looking. These are damn near usable day to day phones now! But there are still a few things that need done and I was wondering what everyone’s thoughts on these were:

1 - tap to pay. I don’t see how this can practically be done. Like, at all.

2 - android auto/apple CarPlay emulation. A Linux phones could theoretically emulate one of these protocols and display a separate session on the head unit of a car. But I dont see any kind of project out there that already does this in an open-source kind of way. The closest I can find are some shady dongles on amazon that give wireless CarPlay to head units that normally require USB cables. It can be done, but I don’t see it being done in our community.

3 - voice assistants. wether done on device or phoning into our home servers and having requests processed there, this should be doable and integrated with convenient shortcuts. Home assistant has some things like this, and there’s good-old Mycroft blowing around out there still. Siri is used every day by plenty of people and she sucks. If that’s the benchmark I think our community can easily meet that.

I started looking at Linux phones again because I loathe what apple is doing to this UI now and android has some interesting foldables but now that google is forcing Gemini into everything and you can’t turn it off, killing third party ROMS, and getting somehow even MORE invasive, that whole ecosystem seems like it’s about to march right off a cliff so its not an option anymore for me.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 days ago

    tap to pay, voice assistants, carplay…everything I hate about modern phones. Don’t threaten me with a good time, Linux.

    • witness_me@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You may not like tap to pay or CarPlay but I and a lot of others do.

      It’s a deal breaker for me to not have these two features in a product I’d like to spend hard earned money on.

  • leastaction@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    Actually I don’t need any of those things you mention. It may be a mistake to assume that Linux phones should imitate Google/Apple phones.

    • OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Obviously this is subjective, but I use android auto all the time and something similar for a linux phone would be really nice for me. Don’t dismiss them just cause you wouldn’t use them

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      My thoughts exactly reading this list. I don’t use any of those as-is and have zero interest. I do agree Linux phones seem a bit behind at the moment, but as soon as they’re on par with say GrapheneOS, then we’re golden.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s not that I want an imitation, but I do want certain functionalities to be available

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Are those actually the only things you find lacking? If so that’s really good, practically the same as using LineageOS without any Google services.

    I don’t use any of the stuff you mentioned and might have to consider Linux mobile as a daily driver if it’s that good. Especially if Google kills custom ROMs, it sounds like the people already running them would feel right at home switching to Linux mobile.

    More importantly, how’s the app situation? Can people generally expect most of the desktop GTK or Qt apps they’re familiar with to be usable on a phone form factor? Is there a reliable way to run Android APKs on regular Linux now? At the very least F-droid apps?

    • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes most native applications are responsive and adapt to mobile.

      GTK has it built into it’s widgets. But some third party apps on GTK/QT may not adapt.

      The capability is there though.

      • 1peter10@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        As someone who spent some time on the topic (result), it’s not that every new app is adaptive. Even if someone uses the nice new widgets of libadwaita (or previously libhandy (GTK3)), that app is not necessary running well on mobile if width-reqests demand a higher minimal width or content is just too wide.

        The same is true for QtQuick Components or Kirigami, which are the equivalent for adaptive Qt apps.

        That said, yes, many new apps developed with these technologies work fine OOTB without the developer even knowing; and if they are too wide or tall, fixing that is usually rather simple and not a full rewrite/redesign.

    • Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      To answer your question about Android apps, there is an application called Waydroid that can run on Linux phones. This essentially emulates Android and you can install apps on there. Some Play Store apps require access to Google Play Services, and even though MicroG tries to emulate it without being as privacy invasive, it is not perfect and some apps won’t run well or even at all.

      I only use it for a few things that do not have any way to access through a web browser.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, you can even run android apps on Linux mobile using waydroid or something similar. So even if you need your stopgap android apps while waiting for Linux equivalents, waydroid has your back.

      As for me, I plan on using PWAs as much as possible.

  • bzxt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 days ago

    By tap to pay, you mean things like Apple pay and Google pay? We don’t have that on degoogled androids, let alone on Linux phones…

    • bongk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      But they are still incredibly useful. I do and will put up with a fully-googled phone just for that convenience.

        • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve never seen a surcharge for tap to pay in the US. I’m not sure about elsewhere, but whether I’m tapping my car, my phone, or my watch I have never seen any surcharge from the retailer, my banks, or from Google.

          • Auth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            ok that makes things better. Here its like a 1-3% surcharge at some shops while larger shops eat the cost.

            • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              We do occasionally see a small surcharge in the US when using a card, but that’s regardless of method (swipe, insert, or tap). Very small businesses will often charge 1-5% for any debit or credit purchase, and cash price is the listed price. But again, that’s not tap specific

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago
    1. Would require banks and such to cooperate. Good luck with that, Microsoft and Google will just pay banks to keep us out
    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      #1 only happens if the EU gets it as a secondary part of whatever their plan is to de-americanize payment-processing

  • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Help a non-techy out. I’ve fully switched my computers to Linux (fedora workstation, silver blue, and ubuntu). Been Linux only for several years now. Silverblue is probably my favorite. I’m willing to make the switch for my phone, too. But there are a few things I’m pretty reliant on:

    My banking apps, cash app, and, embarrassing as it may be to admit, Grindr.

    Any chance of getting those?

    • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      You can run Android apps on a Linux phone via Waydroid, but banking apps could be an issue if they force these Google intrgrity checks. Grindr probably does not?

      Anyway, you should be able to fire up Waydroid on your Linux desktop and test this beforehand. I have never done this myself, so I might have misunderstood something.

      • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Grindr doesn’t even work on GrapheneOS, it’s security checks are insane. I tried the modded Grindr app and they instantly banned my account, so I decided the app isn’t worth my time.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Baking apps: pin the websites Grindr: use waydroid or switch to sniffies Cash App: oof, I don’t know if waydroid will be enough for this one.

      • Dharma Curious@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve honestly never considered using my bank through a mobile browser. Yeah, it I can do that I’d be fine on that front.

        Sniffies is completely dead here, and the dudes that are on it are gross. Grindr isn’t much better, but since everyone’s on it you can occasionally find people who are willing to use protection or hosting someone other than some bushes. I’ll try way droid and see if it works. If it doesn’t, I googled it and it says you can use Grindr from desktop if you pay… I may end up having to do that if I made the switch.

        Which leaves cash app as the biggie. I’ll try waydroid, but if it doesn’t work I’ll probably end up needing to keep android or switching to iOS (I hate iPhones:( ), or maybe even getting a second phone I use exclusively for cash app. No sim, just my wifi hotspot (can you do a wifi hotspot with a Linux phone yet?). In order to prevent overdrafts and accidental charges, I never spend directly from my bank account. I transfer exactly what I’ll need for each purchase to cash app before the transaction and shop like that. Keeps me aware, and no accidental charges or surprises.

      • utopiah@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Baking apps: pin the websites

        Typically if you want to check your account status sure, that work. Maybe do an IBAN transfer, if somehow 2nd step auth via their app isn’t required, but typically mobile payment, even if it’s not really mobile (e.g. scanning a QRcode on a desktop) requires their app. So in theory yes, in practice for most of the things people use banking daily it’s closer to mobile payment IMHO, which is basically owned by iOS/Android AFAICT.

  • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah, Android Auto is definitely the thing I didn’t think I needed and now can’t live without.

    I have no idea if there can be a foss alternative that would work with existing cars…

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Why? I don’t drive and don’t have a car but I can’t imagine the car itself not already having the exact same features since modern cars already have what is essentially a tablet built in.

      Also, why not just have one of those phone holders on your dashboard like people have been doing before car integration was a thing?

      • ngwoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        Cars have garbage software running on even more garbage hardware, Android Auto and Apple Carplay offload the processing to your phone which is orders of magnitude faster

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Exactly. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto took off because car manufacturers have always sucked with tech and this gave them a super cheap way to make a quantum leap forward.

      • Andonyx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        In car nav systems are nowhere near as up to date and useful as maps or Waze. And updating them is often as clunky as a new windows install. Some can only be updated by the dealer. It feels 20 years behind to use the systems offered by a lot of car companies.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Many cars built in features are so terrible they border on useless. Some doesn’t even have things like GPS at all. My EV uses CarPlay for that and has no navigation built in at all, even though it has a GPS radio it uses for onstar services.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not even close by the time you get the car the maps are years out of date. And POI not even close to google or apple maps.

      • hayvan@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Your phone takes over your car screen as a second display, so you have decent and up-to-date navigation apps like gmaps or waze, with instant alerts etc, instead of those garbage GPS navigation devices.

      • vga@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        So does GrapheneOS apparently, as long as we’re talking about Androids.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Power consumption needs work also.

    As for tap to pay, I’ve found I’ve used it a lot less after getting a mag safe wallet. It’s a good stopgap imo

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t really see any of these as deal breakers, because I think the state of Linux phones in 2025 isn’t about being “finished” or “perfect,” it’s about being part of a bigger journey. Every limitation mentioned is just a reflection of where things stand right now, not anything permanent. What kinda excites me is that Linux phones are built around openness, community, and the freedom to adapt, qualities you don’t really get with mainstream options. Sure, there are missing features, rough edges, and some compromises, but none of that outweighs the value of having a device that puts you in control…

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      While I appreciate that, I really want the freedom to use it that way I want to, not the way others are happy with. It’s open, which makes that theoretically possible, but I’m no Linux dev. I can’t create missing features. So I need to work with what people smarter than me came up with.

      • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I get what you mean. The openness invites possibility, but for a lot of us can feel limiting when we can’t build the missing things ourselves…

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    RCS text messaging is another to consider, at least in the US. The carriers implanted it in a proprietary way, so only Apple and Google apps have it. It’s a poor substitute for an IM/chat app and not private and secure like it was promised due to poor implementations, but it’s still far better than plain SMS. I still have people I can’t get to use Signal or another secure IM app.

    The Android Auto is the only one I’d be sad about. I love not having to use my phone’s screen for navigation and the navigation built into most cars is crap and expensive to keep maps and data updated. I like being able to use any navigation app, though Google Maps/Waze is still the only one I’ve found that has both live traffic info, which is extremely important with my city, and reading the street names rather than just “turn left” it says “turn left on some street” so I don’t have to look at the screen as much.

    I use GrapheneOS and that’s what I won’t be able to replace once I finish my Immich and Home Assistant self host setups to replace Google Photos and Google Home/Nest, but st least they are sandboxed a bit.

    Though Google has been moving to make it even more difficult to use their apps on these alternate OSes. Like I just found that Google Photos latest version pops up a not closeable error screen if it doesn’t have full “photos and video” access. Doesn’t work with the limited access or storage scopes that come with GrapheneOS, at least for now. I have photos I don’t want google to scan and index even if they are not being uploaded, which they do now. It’s obviously a ploy to get access to your data since it used to work fine. Now, I just use the mobile website instead until I have time to get Immich totally working and get people to switch if they want to see my stuff or share with me.

    • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I think JMP.chat supports RCS, and it lets you text through Cheogram or another XMPP client. I believe it also upgrades the connection if both users are using Cheogram similar to Signal when it supported SMS

      • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        This is like a google voice number? Do they do VoIP and voicemail transcription, because I don’t have a replacement for Google voice yet.

        https://jmp.chat/

        Edit: yes they do voip, voicemail, and transcriptions, but they do not do RCS yet. When they do, I might consider switching, especially if I can use their voicemail for my regular number, like gv.

        JMP does not (yet) support these features:

        • RCS, which allows for video calls over the phone network.
  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    1 - tap to pay. I don’t see how this can practically be done. Like, at all.

    Yeah, better go back to carrying pieces of plastic with you at all times. Bonus: you can leave your phone home and still pay for things.

  • bent@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Which phone did you find where these are the only problem you encountered? I don’t care about any of these things and haven’t been finding any usable Linux phones.

      • bent@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        They’re slow and clunky as fuck for starters. Cellular is very spotty.

        Do you have a good alternative I can look into? I really, really, really want them to work. The only usable Linux phone I’ve seen is Jolla, but I’d much rather have Mobian or Arch on mobile or some other fully FLOSS alternative

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    google is forcing Gemini into everything and you can’t turn it off,

    You can still shut off Gemini as of right now. I don’t know what it’ll be like in the future though.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    3 - voice assistants. wether done on device or phoning into our home servers and having requests processed there, this should be doable and integrated with convenient shortcuts. Home assistant has some things like this, and there’s good-old Mycroft blowing around out there still. Siri is used every day by plenty of people and she sucks. If that’s the benchmark I think our community can easily meet that.

    Of all the things that my phone is supposed to be able to do this is the one thing I never touch. It has never worked better for me than just doing it with my own two thumbs.

    Does anyone actually use their voice to control their phone (not voice typing)?

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s funny, I never use 1 and 2, but I use 3 often.

      I used to use tap to pay, but I recently acquired one of those adhesive credit card holders that has obviated my need for to pay.

      I have an old car and just have my phone in a holder if I need to see turn by turn directions. Unfortunately the credit card holder fucks with the phone stand a little bit, but it mostly still works. The few times in my life I used android auto I disliked it.

      I most often use voice assistant to ask for a song to play on Spotify. This was really convenient with “hey google” while I was driving or had my phone in my pocket listening to headphones, but I live without it these days.