• SleepyPie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Hello folks.

    For reasons unrelated to this post I believe everyone should get into the FPV drone hobby. People with minimal constitution can get great results - especially gamers!

    A radio controller is about $150, and can be used with many great simulators on steam. Once you are comfortable with the simulation, invest in a (few) drones. Most of their parts can be 3D printed for cheap, and the rest bought from Chinese companies for cheap.

    It is a lot of fun to fly around in the first person view. I hear they are very popular in Ukraine for some reason.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      54 minutes ago

      What if i wanted to combine my two favorite hobbies of guns and drones? How would I go about fusing them in some kind of way?

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Anyone who thinks their AR-15 ga going to let them take on a tyrannical government has no understanding of how tanks work.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        IFVs exist for this exact purpose and they typically have minimum 1 per tank if not 2.

        You ain’t gonna get very far when theres a 25mm auto cannon spraying and praying in your general direction.

        Plus the coaxial 7.62 MGs

        Plus the hull mounted M2 .50 cal MGs.

        Why do you think separatists and resistance movements have to rely on IEDs and forcing fights in urban environments with a metric ton of cover available?

        Why do you think they get steamrolled by mechanized armored units like almost every time that forces them into guerilla fighting tactics like digging tunnels and using mountainous terrain?

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Sure, but they will get in that tank inside a well fortified base protected by helecopters with door mounted mini guns and Hellfire missiles, go out and kill people with piddly little AR-15s at an industrial scale, then return to their well fortified bases for afternoon tea.

        The second ammendment was wirten back when the people and the government had the same weapons. That isn’t the case anymore. If you take on the government, you die. If 100,000 of you take on the government most of you die. Unless you can get a sizeable portion of the peopulation out from in front of Keeping Up with the Kardashains and into the street to protest you’re a pedofascist dictatorship for the forseeable future.

    • Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The US’s violence budget far exceeds any existing well regulated militia, let alone Cletus’ gun cabinet. The government can kill us from a great height from outside of visual range. That’s why it’s very very important to elect people you can trust, or have a revolution if the candidates are all trash. It’s a very good reason to not elect a maniacal, demented, fucking moron. Oops.

      That said, it’s not about being able to win a war against the government, it’s about making it more trouble than it’s worth.

  • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Funny thing is, if an armed populace is utterly incapable of doing a single damn thing as the gun banners say they are, WHY do the authoritarians in charge of these powerful modern military still banning guns?

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Same reason they only come out when surrounded by bulletproof glass or in sniper-controlled areas now. They don’t want to be individually targeted.

      Now it’s interesting to imagine what would happen if hundreds of officials were individually targeted, but having a bunch of guns at your house ≠ that. Still the issue of targeted suppression exists, and would be highly effective.

      If you burn down a neighborhood, if you shoot an RPG or a drone at a house, none of the guns inside matter, except they make it more lethal as you try to escape. They also make your house more unsafe for kids and yourself (statistically).

      Arming yourself up defensively just doesn’t do much. If they want you dead, they’re gonna do it in a zero-casualty-for-them way. They can do that en masse, they can do that in rural or urban areas. They train for that 24/7. They love that.

      Arming yourself offensively, well that’s something else. I don’t know if that’s what’s being suggested when this issue comes up though.

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s problematic to say you’re arming up to actively hurt someone, even on Lemmy I believe they have rules against it. So you can only say I want to defend myself or try to imply through a wink or nudge.

        What I’m tired of though is people thinking it’s all going to be lone gunmen or large formations of people fighting. This is a resistance movement, we should be thinking like the French did when the Nazis came.

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You can be non-peaceful and be non-violent.

    Disturb the fucking peace, you don’t need a gun for that. In fact having a gun with you might make things more dangerous.

    Nobody is shooting at ICE, weapons do not help. They only make you feel like you are prepared while achieving nothing.

    Now, spiking tires with nails, a car breaking down, blocking the street ICE wants to take, punching a nazi… that’s way more effective, easy and (slightly) safer.

    Fuck “the right to bear arms”, you don’t need legal weapons, do illegal shit, fuck their peace up. Do not let them sleep, eat or work. Be disturbing the peace, be gay, do crime. You do not need weapons, you don’t need violence, you do need to step out of line and stop being peaceful.

    Peaceful can be ignored.

    Look to the yellow vests in France for inspiration.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Arm” yourselves with gas masks, hardhats, traffic cones (if holes for air at the top, duct tape them shut.

  • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Cops shouldn’t have assault rifles either, they’re not the military. I find the second amendment so fucking dumb. It’s to rise up against a tyrannical government. But since you have it, precisely now is the time to use it. Helloooow? Why don’t you use it? You have a tyrannical government full of pedophiles. All those decades full of innocent deaths, all so you can keep your precious second amendment, just in case you reach a point you are in now. Well, go ahaid then, prove all those deaths were worth it. Bunch of self-centered uneducated hypocrites.

    • Azrael@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I agree with you. The issue is that the people who have been fighting to keep the second amendment are the ones who are siding with and enabling the government. The pro-second amendment people are the ones who voted for Trump in the first place.

      • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So? Are they the only ones allowed to buy guns? Or is the second amendment also for the Trump haters?

        When my government would turn complete authoritarian fascist, I would love it if I could just buy a gun in the local supermarket.

        • Azrael@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’m assuming from the way your comment is worded that you’re not from the U.S.

          Blue states tend to have much stricter gun laws, as another user pointed out. For example, in California, “Assault Rifles” are banned. You most certainly cannot walk into a supermarket and buy an AR-15. As far as i’m aware, most major retailers including Walmart don’t sell guns at all in California. Even handguns have a maximum magazine capacity. No more than 10 rounds. Much less than your standard Glock or Sig Sauer.

          I’d also like to point out that “Buying a gun in the local supermarket” is a little bit of a misconception. It’s true that some superstores sell guns, but they aren’t right next to the milk and bread. They’re in locked cabinets in a specific part of the store where you’ll also find other hunting equipment. The whole point of a superstore/supermarket is that they sell everything in one place as opposed to the pre-supermarket days where you had to go to multiple different stores just to get your weekly shopping supplies.

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Over here, we don’t need to buy guns with our weekly shopping supplies. We have liquor over 20% alcohol in a different section of the store. Can’t even buy cigarettes at the supermarket. Even slingshots and batons are illegal here. Did you know, with a 10 round magazine you can still kill 10 people before reloading? If your aim is right. That’s an acceptable amount? As those magazine sizes are allowed.

        • Soulg@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well for starters, we can’t just buy a gun in a supermarket. You seem to not actually know what you’re talking about and just get information from memes.

        • balderdash@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I would love it if I could just buy a gun in the local supermarket.

          The democrat states/cities have much harsher gun laws. The republican states/cities aren’t going to resist Trump.

          If more people would move to the left we would see more anti-fascist gun resistance (think Black Panther Party). But since people still believe that we can fix this decades-long decline by voting in the right Democrats, we’re going to have to learn the hard way.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What is an assault rifle? I don’t think what non-military civilians or police carry qualify. I know a few grandfathered fully automatic rifles are out there but they cost like $40k and they’re mostly in the hands of collectors. Most guns are semi auto and semi auto rifles are great for hunting things like wild boar.

        • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The only problem is when we define everyone who disagrees with us as a fascist. I won’t go hunting authoritarians but if they bring a fight, I’m ready to finish it. That includes authoritarian fascists and leftists, because I’m not on board with either.

          • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’m not labeling anyone I don’t like a fascist. Like Trump, calling people fascist communists. Like, how does that even work exactly?

            I only classify fascists as such if they behave like fascists.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The interpretation of the 2nd amendment that the courts take never made sense to me. It clearly says states can have well-regulated militias, not that citizens must have rifles with 50rd drum magazines.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 hours ago

        A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

        Emphasis mine - obviously there’s more than one interpretation, but I think that if the intent was to only protect the rights of people to keep and bear arms if and only if they are members of some organized militia, it would have been clearly indicated by the text. It seems obvious to me that everything before that comma is explanatory, personally.

        • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s very funny to me how much of US law discussion is arguing the intent of what some slavers wrote 250 years ago.

          Is it even worse in Europe? Are people holding up the Magna Carta and going “see, it was never intended for widows to remarry”

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The reality is that a lot of that law discussion is bullshit, the Supreme Court infamously just picks and chooses constitutional interpretations to support whatever goes in line with whatever they wanted to do in the first place. The more you learn about the Supreme Court, the more obvious it becomes.

            I can’t speak for the rest of Europe, but we don’t have anything similar here, but we don’t have a written constitution.

        • sobchak@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Perhaps. I read it as the “setup” being the emphasized part (i.e. the context set by the first part of the sentence), with the states being a representative of the “people” under the political theory at the time… This was written by the elite more or less fine with slavery and indentured servitude, and only thought that white male landowners really counted. Either way, I think regular citizens should be able own firearms.

    • Enkrod@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Gandhi was non violent and unarmed. But he WAS NOT peaceful. His protests were absolutely poison for the colonial economy and he broke several laws and had stints in prison during his time.

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m reminded in this time that one of the reasons that Japan dare trying to invade the USA was “A gun behind every blade of grass.” Helicopters, planes, drones can’t hold positions. You need troops on the ground to hold a position to keep people in line. It’s hard to to do that when you can be shot from any direction.

        As well to me, if I’m facing the possibility of being killed execution style for just demonstrating or helping someone that was maced, I’d rather be armed. Even if I have little chance of surviving, that’s better than 0.

  • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I like not being a gringo.

    I like living in a normal country.

    I like living in a country that’s not controlled by a cabal of pedofiles.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    22 hours ago

    COPY/PASTA

    In the US we have the Second Amendment. The fascists have been the ones screaming and yelling about the Second Amendment, but the truth is that all Americans have the right.

    Owning a gun isn’t enough. Driving to Cabela’s and picking up a vermin killing .22 rifle is not enough. You should buy a proper rifle, a pistol, and a knife or baton. (Bonus points for a shotgun) Then you need to train with said rifle, pistol and knife/baton. Go to a range and shoot. Look for local self defense/hand to hand combat with a weapon classes and train.

    I am not advocating for violence…far from it. But I am advocating for knowledge because owning a weapon and not knowing how to use it is a recipe for disaster.

    PS: If you can afford it, buy suppressors and/or active hearing protection. Especially for your rifles. Suppression for the common citizen isn’t about stealth like in the movies, it is about protecting your hearing. Guns are LOUD. Much louder than you expect. Suppressors might be out of reach for most but quality active and passive hearing protection is not.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Irony.

        It could be just me. I’m on day 5 of a hellish production upgrade, so I’ve had nothing else to do but shitpost on Lemmy and watch Olympic coverage as I babysit this shitshow.

    • in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Familiarity is important, training will save your life.

      Get an IFAK and go to a stop the bleed class https://www.stopthebleed.org/

      If you’re currently versed in Firearms and are able to start a chapter, or if you are lucky enough to live in an area with a local chapter the SRA is a good organization. However they are apparently fractured and their politics may not align. https://socialistra.org/

      https://www.blazingsword.org/ is better for LGBTQ+ anarchists that tend to not get along with Tankies.

      A more decentralized option could be a John Brown Gun Club https://www.counterextremism.com/supremacy/john-brown-gun-club

      Good basis of organized tactics. The guide below is more about organized movement than direct fire. Below will NOT help you in a firefight as it relies on a much larger trained force than you are likely to have. Good to know what the bastards study though. https://www.trngcmd.marines.mil/Portals/207/Docs/TBS/B2F2837 Rifle Squad Tactics.pdf?ver=2015-05-27-100939-710

      How to avoid getting balled up and kettled. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/anarch-ish-how-to-win-at-kettling-a-guide-for-non-policemen

      Sabotage guide from WW2 https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/26184.txt.utf-8

      General armed defense https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/organizing-armed-defense-in-america

      How to organize a rapid response from a very high level with further detailed resources. https://southerncoalition.org/resources/rapid-response-101/

      Good general advice on organizing, also a good resource to find groups near you that are likely aligned. https://www.fiftyfifty.one/organizer-resources

      Feel free to reach out for any other resources

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Maybe I’m just old, but suppressors seem pointless to me. If I understand correctly, you need to use subsonic ammo to get the full effect, which pretty much negates the extra “stopping power” of rifles (or higher velocity handguns). Simple foam ear plugs, like many people wear to work, can be as good or better in terms of db reduction if going to a range or popping some off in “the back 40” if you’re fortunate. If you need to run to your gun in an emergency to save you’re own life, I don’t think you’d take the time to grab your hearing protection. Hearing impaired is better than dead. And you’re definitely not going to EDC active hearing protection. Perhaps I’m not understanding the benefits though. I see the benefits if it’s like your job or something (work at a range, are a rancher that shoots vermin/predators at night). I suppose if you’re training in some kind of militia to work in a squad, active hearing protection with integrated radio would be nice, but virtually nobody is doing that.

      • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Even with hearing protection protracted use of firearms still causes hearing damage. A suppressed firearm is going to cause less damage over time than an unsuppressed. Is it perfect? Nope, but it is better than nothing.

        I recently watched a video on the differences of a suppressed and unsuppressed weapon in the field. You can tell a difference certainly, and again, it’s enough to reduce harm to your hearing.

      • French75@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s moronic. We demand lower noise in most products, but demand higher noise in guns because we can’t distinguish Hollywood bullshit from reality. I think most CA Dems would accept the premise that reducing injurious noise levels while participating in a legal activity is a good idea, but institutionally they’d never give an inch on gun laws.

        • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Let’s be real here, if CA had their way, the only guns citizens would be legally allowed to own are muzzleloaders/muskets, and even then those would be heavily regulated.

          I swear, CA becomes more of a nanny state by the day, and unfortunately, many people in LA and SF just nod in smug approval.

          • French75@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            For sure, but my point was that t hey know that outright banning guns is nearly impossible, so they’ve done essentially what the republicans have done on abortion. They’ve attacked it on every other conceivable angle: they’ve made it hard to buy guns, hard to use them, hard to run any business that sells them, hard to buy ammo, hard to stay in legal compliance with constantly changing laws and case law.

            The state’s strategy has essentially morphed to enacting every law and policy that makes it harder to buy, own, and use guns, knowing that most of them are not legal, but get them tied up in courts indefinitely. It’s a scummy strategy, but it’s been fairly effective.

          • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I thank Reagan and the Democrats for that. That act was unanimously passed just because white people were scared of black people protecting themselves from the racist cops.

          • NotBillMurray@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Except for current or former police officers. They can buy what they like and even sell to people no questions asked.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Who you gonna shoot? I’m serious. Stalin was a bankrobber. Haitians drove Napoleon’s army into the sea with machetes. The Black Panthers took several pigs off roll-call. What’s your plan, revolutionary?

    • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Im not american but hopefully nobody. Their whole rationality for having guns everywhere all the time is that if everyone has a gun nobody needs a gun.

      We, the rest of the world, think its a stupid idea, but if the government is literally killing people in the streets and declaring the murderers as heroes, its not looking so daft.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They use the same rationale for international security. If everybody gas nuclear bombs, then nobody needs them. It’s insane doomsday evangelism dressed up as a debate club argument.

      • Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        22 hours ago

        For the first time in my life I have considered a gun. I agree with your comment, it’s typically something I don’t need or want. I don’t want my neighbours to want them or need them.

        But here we are and it’s terrible.

    • seathru@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Simply being prepared for the worst is a plenty fine plan. Just, actually be prepared, don’t just buy a gun and expect to know how to use it proficiently when the need arises.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I believe that I can go to the store and purchase a sense of security. Once I own a gun, I can indulge in revolutionary fantasies that aren’t complicated by material conditions.

      Safety is just another thing we’ve commoditized. No need to struggle against my own alienation or form coalition with my neighbors.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      “Please guys, I know they’re killing us now, but if you arm up, they will still kill you. Take the high road, know that you did in your final moments as they’re beating you to death then execute you like Alex was.”

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    22 hours ago

    You all have guns, don’t see anyone using them but the popo? Way to stand against an aggressive state, eh!

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Because we don’t all have guns, the data is skewed by the far right rednecks who each have like 20 guns

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I know plenty of democrats or centrists with guns, they just happen to also be rational people. It’s time to bring them out though.

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Agreed, I want to see a quarter of the people in demonstrations armed. Not fighting, just armed, expressing their constitutional rights. I want them to also patrol and secure neighborhoods, be armed when in public. I want ICE to really consider next time they’re going to execute someone instead of just walking up to them on the ground and putting a round in their head.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah, that whole second amendment thing turned out to be the joke we all thought. I’ve never known a nation to just roll over and take it as much as this bunch. They’re pathetic and their overlords obviously know it.

      • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Or, and hear me out here, we’re really trying to not give dipshit the ammo he needs to deploy the military against us. Because when that happens, it’s game over.

        • bearboiblake@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Compliance in advance with fascism to avoid violence does not prevent violence. It allows violence to continue against minority groups, to the benefit of the majority.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          If we resist his deployment of the military and feds into our cities he may deploy the military to our cities

    • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Fun fact! If you’ve ever been involuntarily committed to like a psychiatric hospital you’re barred by Federal law from owning firearms! Some kinds of emergency and temporary holds are okay, but yeah because my wife had technically gotten involuntarily committed years ago before we met because she couldn’t make it to the hospital safely for it to be voluntary she can’t have them at all and it’s unclear if I’d be able to with my own history of mental health issues

      • AlexLost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This does make sense, so I’m confused why it’s actually law. I thought common sense gun laws were non existent in the USA?!

        • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Because apparently people don’t learn the laws like they should before they spout off. Like it’s illegal to own or purchase a firearm if you’re a convicted domestic abuser. Now enforcement, we can talk how lax that might be.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    How did this work out for Alex Pretti? He’s the perfect example of how this shit will/would play out. Stop telling people to commit suicide ffs.

    • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Martin Luther King Jr. was only successful because he was the carrot, The Black Panthers were the stick. But tell me again how being armed is a bad idea entirely when it’s shown in history disarmed populations are just easier pickings.

    • bearboiblake@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Renee Good didn’t have a gun and got killed anyways. It’s a good idea for everyone to arm themselves to fight fascism, believe it or not.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Do you realize that Minnesota is doing it right and that we should follow their lead instead of criticizing them?

        • bearboiblake@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m not criticising anyone, just pointing out your fallacious reasoning. For what it’s worth, I don’t think there is one single “right” approach, revolutionary movements are complex and multi-faceted, successful movements usually have a more moderate wing and a more militant wing, I want to see that more militant wing start to become bigger, stronger, and more visible. A peaceful protest movement by itself accomplishes very little - it is the state’s fear of the threat of worsening violence which actually brings about a change. For that fear to be realized, it needs to be visible. I don’t want widespread violence or mass shootings, I just want visibly armed protesters standing up against ICE and defending themselves if necessary.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Alex was a kind and caring individual, and if he thought he was going to die I bet he still wouldn’t have used his sidearm.

      I, on the other hand, am not a kind and caring individual. If someone rolls up on me aggressively, my instinct is to pull out and let god sort them out.

      that said, I have hyper situational awareness. I don’t put myself in compromising situations. I get myself out of them.

      I’m not a badass. I’m not a hero. I’m just a guy trying to come home to his family.