Too late assholes… I’m already deleting most of the posts I made on my discord and I will be migrating elsewhere soon.

  • thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If Discord cared about this, they’d use the same identity platforms governments use. For example, in the US, id.me is a requirement for many federal services. While it does deanonymize me and there are privacy concerns expanding this tech beyond government services, I trust id.me to take my data security seriously. It has to have federal security requirements. If their data is breached, there will be repercussions and reparations.

    Discord, on the other hand, uses random vendors. There were no repercussions or reparations for the previous leak. Discord said moving forward they’d require SOC2 Type II or ISO 27001 for vendors. Crucially, neither of these certifications matter a fucking iota for personally identifiable information and Discord itself will not be completely them so even if the vendors were PII secure Discord will not hold itself to the same standards. Discord does not care about its users; Discord only cares about the ad revenue this will open up.

    • DireTech@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t even trust Id.me. If the government needs to securely identify someone they should be setting it up themselves instead of us trusting some random company that used to provide coupons to soldiers.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t even trust id.me. Why would I give my ID and photo or video to a corporation that is contracting with the Trump administration?

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I thought the requirements came from the Biden admin but I’m not able to find evidence of this.

        What you’re describing is the prisoner’s dilemma. In theory, none of us should interact with the current admin because if that happened they’d shut down. Of course if we did that, many federal employees and all of the contractors wouldn’t be able to feed their kids in a week or so, so it only works if we can guarantee a universal strike without scabs. But wait, we know people are actively joining ICE, so everyone with half a brain dropping government work doesn’t guarantee those without a brain won’t scab. If we have scabs, then future admin is left with a poisoned well and that existing possibly okay workforce is now on the breadline with an admin that’s not only hostile to breadlines but anyone who fights back. Don’t forget costs are currently skyrocketing for everything and electricity is about to be through the roof everywhere. In other words, many people have the choice of morals or food for their kids. Or healthcare if that resonates more.

        Assuming you’re in the US, will you file your taxes this year? Since you’re not willing to give anyone contracting with the Trump admin your personal information, you’ll have to do them by hand. Even a CPA is technically doing work for the IRS who is part of the Trump admin even if he’s suing them. Are you allowing your employer to keep social security and Medicare taxes? If so, I think you might have discovered a reason why a rational person who is just trying to get by might intentionally support the Trump admin. If not, by god, you have stronger morals than I do and good luck with that jail sentence. Unfortunately, some of us have to participate in society even though we want to improve it.

        Edit: I want to make it clear that my annoyance with your response is the Trump admin bit. If you had said “why trust a private company with my govt” I would have said yeah digital ID is hard that’s a really good point we needed trusted govt actors not capitalists to handle this stuff. My point about repercussions and reparations is something the Trump admin is ostensibly on board with so it doesn’t really matter what the greedy fucking billionaires do so long as they fuck each other up for breaking their own rules. That’s actually another great counter and something I’ve said elsewhere; the Trump admin is pretty anti consumer so you’d think here they’d fuck the little guy. A breach in this instance costs them face and money so they care a small amount, even more so if it’s cronyism. Either the world is going to end with Trump or there will be a world after Trump and I for one have to plan for a world after Trump where the US is dealing with all the other problems we’ve made.

  • plz1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Deleting posts is just setting visibility to 0. They still exist, and you should assume they exist forever.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Yeah, so, “most users” won’t have to post video selfies or their ID, but you’ll still have to accept active spyware feeding information to an AI model that checks all your activity.

    This is still equally as bad.

  • Novis@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    198
    ·
    7 hours ago

    People need to realize that this isn’t JUST a Discord issue. This is a policy issue AS WELL. Fucking pay attention to the politics around you. And this isn’t just a United States issue as well.

    • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Chat control was one of the most notable signs that this is an issue around the world with it still popping up over and over in the EU. This is a global fight.

    • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      7 hours ago

      this is true… its not just Discord… politics are pushing hard on tech… like Facebook, Google, well everything basically… They want to push age verification everywhere.

      Its really dangerous, and I will never comply (even though I have nothing to hide). I already deleted my discord. I will not join back anymore. Its too late already.

      Each chat, social network or anything that is trying to implement this -> ACCOUNT DELETED.

      Edit: Discord’s preparation to go public with an IPO… So go away from discord now.

      • Novis@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        7 hours ago

        What I’m saying isn’t that you should or shouldn’t delete social media accounts. What I’m saying is that eventually they’re all going to HAVE to do it to be able to operate within certain countries. The account deletion/boycott/etc isn’t enough, you have to go after the political leaders that are FORCING companies into these deals cause governments are GOING to continue to go after companies to force the whole of the internet into surveilling users. Policy and laws need to be changed. The work HAS to be done.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I just host my own open source instances. Like matrix for chat. And mbin for the fediverse. This is how I now communicate with you.

          No age verification. Mbin will never implement it either. And matrix won’t either. Otherwise I will fork matrix also.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.onlineOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You must never comply ESPECIALLY if you have nothing to hide. They are treating innocent people like terrorists and criminals and this is not acceptable.

        I pray that the impetus from all this results in overturning all of the (allegedly) anti-terrorist legislation made post 9/11 (post 2000 in some cases).

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You must never comply ESPECIALLY if you have nothing to hide.

          I agree. I just mentioned it explicitly, since I was afraid of responses like… Ow… Do you hide something?

      • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        ahem… politics is NOT pushing on tech…

        tech is pushing and telling politics what to do. tech controls politics now

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Well… I dunno well… I think both. I believe nobody wants to be responsible and they just point to each other 🤔

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m just going to repeat myself for the hundredth time here. This is exactly what happens when you define words in such broad terms. Social media does not include things like discord. It doesn’t include Reddit, it doesn’t include Lemmy. But because so many damn people just refer to any site that they can talk with other people on as social media, it became enshrined in law and now literally every service you touch is legally defined as social media.

      This is not hyperbole; with the current definitions across numerous countries, Amazon (the place where you buy things, not other services like games) is legally defined as social media.

      Words mean things and when words are hijacked for other purposes it allows governments to strip away your rights without you realizing.

      • Novis@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So I kinda walked away from this to think about what’s being said a bit and I just kinda have to disagree? Like, being clear and concise and accurate in defining something is hella important… to the people that care about those things. The thing we see though isn’t lacking definitions, especially in a legal sense, but people not pushing back enough whenever bad actors start bringing up terrible arguments. There are people out there that you can bring up the best, most logical points in the world and they will still twist and twist and twist until your original point is lost. We can make the most robust, perfect definitions and some people will STILL either find ways around it or completely ignore what was rationally established. The definition doesn’t matter, the problem is fascists want to monitor the world and make whoever they want disappear and people kinda just let it happen.

        And to be clear, I’m trying to say you’re completely wrong. Defining things is important to establish a shared common framework of understanding and policy making and regulations are SO SO SO IMPORTANT cause they save lives in more than just one way, but problem isn’t clear cut to be solved with “we need to define things better.” We have a culture issue. Culture issues need more than one approach to resolve.

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          It’s a forum. Just like all the other forums before it. It just happened to get very popular. To be clearer: if you define Reddit as social media then you are including almost every single website on the planet. It makes the definition completely pointless.

          Regulations shouldn’t be defined in this way.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s all the same for me. It doesn’t matter, whether it’s discord, games, reddit, lemmy, Mastodon, mbin, X, Facebook. It’s all the same and also at the not the same.

        But in the end it’s all software. I hope that we can agree with. And this software is empowering people. And politics don’t like that…

      • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Words don’t have meanings. Meanings have words.

        Amazon the internet megastore allows non-employees of Amazon to add content to their store. Both as supposed vendors offering goods for services and as customers giving reviews and ratings to such store listings. And Amazon chooses what listings to show to users through opaque algorithms.

        Can you give an example of the sort of regulation a social media site should need to follow which Amazon should be exempt from? Or the sort of rule that should bind reddit and Facebook but not Amazon?

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I vote for this guy for president.

        I grew up with certain words meaning certain things. Then I get older, and suddenly, those words are gone, new words exist, old words mean new things, medical terms are now no longer medical terms and just purely an insult derived from a definition that didn’t used to define the root word. Pluto isn’t a planet. Instead of 9 planets, there are now an unknown number at least in the thousands. There’s like 4 other Earths.

        Language shouldn’t change over time. It can adapt, but I should know that grass is green. Not grass is plubertatude. A word I just made up for the demonstration of absurdity. Nothing wrong with grass being green.

        • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          medical terms are now no longer medical terms and just purely an insult

          Language drifts over time, that’s normal, always has been. Stay on target soldier. FORMAL language however needs very strict definitions or it just stops working. Words mean things is true. That still doesn’t mean you get to say the “R” word.

  • nullroot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh look, so they’re saying they’re already training ai on all the data they have on us? Yeah I feel my privacy being so respected.

  • kinkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    This is misleading. Discord is not reversing course. It was in their original announcement that they would try to automatically determine everyone’s age and “most” people won’t need to do any sort of verification. A lot of people and journalists didn’t read that far apparently.

    • hobovision@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes, they aren’t changing course, but Discord certainly did not say “most” in the announcement and it was a single sentence in a long article about age verification and content gating. They should have been far more upfront about their inference method being the primary one in the first place. This was a communication issue and not a reader issue.

      It’s also possible they decided to tune their inference model to be a lot more, let’s say, permissive so that there isn’t a huge backlash of people getting asked to provide ID when they’ve been using the service for nearly a decade or longer.

  • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They didn’t walk back shit, they upped the stakes by saying they use your chats to analyse your age. That’s just as bad.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think the article title is technically correct. They walked back the fears that users had. You’re right that they haven’t changed their policy, and they’ve exposed themselves as being extra creepy to someone like us, but we aren’t the majority of Discord users.

      I imagine the average Discord user, if they were even aware of this change at all, is breathing a sigh of relief right now, until these changes (or changes like them) actually affect those people

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They were already doing that.

      Every advertising company already monitors you whenever possible to determine things like your age to target ads as effectively as possible. If a isn’t relying on a third party for advertising like Google AdSense, and they’re handling it internally, they definitely know that info.

      • KiwiTB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I assumed they were already doing that, after all the IPO is coming do they will be doing all they can to make money and avoid risk. Admitting it however shows they are desperate.

    • Creegz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      To think they weren’t already doing that is naive. They hold a lot of liability hosting the amount of data they do, and that’s without the obvious gain they’d have selling data.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If I used discord, they would assume I’m 7 years old.

      goes back to sitting on the living room floor, and watching Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles while eating cereal with gummy bears added in

      Jokes on you, discord! I’m 42!

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They definitely know you’re 42. Kids these days don’t have the attention span for longer, plot-heavy cartoons like TMNT.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      they have already done this for at least the last year or so easily. I noticed it when I requested by data package last year, theres a clear area on it that infers both your gender and your age in it.

      They are just acting like this is a “new system” but in reality its a system that have had for awhile now, just didn’t have any public facing usage of it.

      For anyone else that wants to see it themselves, and they have a discord takeout. its located at the very bottom in the events file in activity/analytics.

      the end of the file shows json objects that indicate what your predicted age and gender is.

      edit: I found this file isn’t a static location, it is still in the activity/analytics directory in one of your event files, but you need to search “age” or “gender” to find it if it isn’t at the bottom

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Not to mention, even if it proves satisfactory to the existing userbase, any new users will start with no history to draw inferences from, wouldn’t that tend to imply that any existing users unaffected are essentially “grandfathered in”, but with the same privacy concerns for everyone else in the long run?

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “For most users” the whole point here is to gradually get people used to having to show their papers to access the internet. We must accept nothing less than a total reversal here. Give them an inch each day and eventually they’ll have their mile.

  • zewm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Sorry but I’m not clicking a link ending in .ai

    I’ll wait for another source.

    • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago
      1. They were ALREADY scanning your data using AI… And banning people for simply discussing certain topics.
      2. How do people even notice these things? I honestly couldn’t tell. (Edit: okay, I forgot about the domain)

      Anyways, I’m trying to get people in specific vulnerable communities to switch to matrix. But the amount of people refusing to do so out of convenience (and even refusing to setup MFA or using different passwords for their online accounts, including discord) is staggering.

      • serpineslair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I get your point. But unfortunately the sad truth is, even IF we can convince techie nerds to switch, do you really believe we could convince the vast majority of the ignorant public? The answer is no. And even as a techie who works with computers on a daily basis, I have my reservations about Matrix. It is a slow, buggy, hot mess for the most part, and it’s even more inconvenient when it comes to voice/video chat.

        What I’m learning from this is that there is NO FEASIBLE alternative to Discord, let alone one the general public would be willing to switch to. I’ve now got the task of converting my friends to Signal as a temporary half-measure before we have a reliable alternative, but things aren’t looking good.

        • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I agree that matrix is a slow and buggy hot mess, but its issues mainly lie with scaling. As long as your instance is small it works well enough. Imo this is architectural and will never be fixed with synapse.

          As for no alternatives for discord. I think the problem is that people have come to expect a certain level of QoS with hosted services that are expensive to maintain for hobbyists (cdn, load balancing, nat traversal, ddos protection, etc). I think this is fundamental to how we’re abusing IP when it’s way past its prime and on life support using middle boxes. If we want to reclaim this space, the best way forward would be something like NDN, but the transition would be astronomical that nobody wants to do it.