• rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have a take on that. I’m going with hank green on this one. https://youtu.be/jOR4wuiPeEQ

      The entire US economy is being held up by the ultra-wealthy right now. We should be in a recession, but they’re pushing all the right buttons in all the right places to keep stocks where they need to be to keep running.

      The AI bubble isn’t blindly bobbing around on the top waiting to pop, it’s orchestrated. Yes, it’s a bubble. Yes the stated value there isn’t anywhere near real. But it’s not going to pop until they let it. Investors are going to stay with it as long as they’re not scared of it going away and the ultra rich are using it as a vehicle to maintain wealth and unless they somehow screw up, it’s not going anywhere until they decide to do something different.

      OpenAI isn’t too big to fail, but the Industry as a whole is too well-funded and tightly controlled to let it fail, for now.

      • Nangijala@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Stupid question, but since the world is currently falling over itself to make new business connections/alliances and is moving away from investing in the US economy because the clown president likes to threaten his allies, how long will the US economy last as the world slowly abandons America? Because while the movement may appear slow right now, I am actually experiencing this extreme change in the world order to be happening super fast. The effects may not be felt over night and maybe not even in ten years, but what trump has accomplished in one year, will most likely have a very negative impact on the US economy for decades and decades to come. Because we ain’t fucking coming back. That’s for sure.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          Not a stupid question at all, but so far in the weeds of speculation that we couldn’t get a straight answer out of it with a 24 pack of beer, a d100, and a really good DM. But let’s ponder.

          The nature of international trade and finance is screwy AF. It’s like finance for the rich, where the only money that exists is what people owe to you and what you owe to people. Noting ever changes hands, not to say that it would soften the blows but it does make the effects move more slowly than one might want.

          If it were just the international fall of Apple, Microsoft, and Google, along with the standard bits and bobbles of alcohol, and whatever 100 other odd consumer products we actually still manage to produce in the states, I don’t think that’ll hurt us as much as whatever eventually happens to with AI. A single day of military production probably outstrips most of that. While it’s possible that other warmachines can ramp up to quell the hunger of everyone for world destruction and weapons for self-preservation, I suspect once the current series of aggressions, fiasco,s and administration disappear, the US war machine will still find plenty of buyers, though the menu will likely change as we’ll no longer seen as a reliable ally. Food and Oil/industrial exports will likely fluctuate, at most. I suspect they’ll be forced to sell at a discount. If tourism doesn’t recover, that’ll beat the F out of a lot of places. We might see Vegas go fallout style.

          I’d love to see European alternatives for Apple, Microsoft, and Google. I’d import that in a hot second.

          Honestly, If the world really wanted to see the US burn, they could just stop trade altogether. The time to restructure food, coal and oil would be enough to starve out a lot of the population, even if we’re relatively close to self sustaining, none of those channels are setup.

          Imaine the calls for blood when you can’t get produce out of season and avocados become $15 each.

      • araneae@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Ah so a market upset the rich control the timing for, virtually indistinguishable from a bubble unless you’re holding all the cards, amazing analysis by HanK Green.

    • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      OpenAI is small fry compared to the other AI players. They are the least likely to get a bailout.

      This is actually a moment where “Thanks Obama” applies, what a precedence to set… Should have given the relief on the demand-side, not the fucking banks.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Still waiting for that crypto pop. It seems less relevant nowadays, but judging by Bitcoin’s current price, it hasn’t quite popped.

    Sure hope my GPU is built to last.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The sad thing is that when it bursts it won’t do it in a hilarious “billionaires all get shafted” way like it didn’t any of the previous times. It’s far more likely to take the form of the most powerful AIs suddenly only being accessible to the wealthy.

  • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The tech bros have been disastrously wrong about the future of technology twice since Moore’s Law broke and the endless treadmill of computer upgrades stopped: about crypto and about the metaverse. They’re desperate to not be wrong again, and they think that by spending enough money they can generate a reality distortion field that actually makes overhyped AI financially feasible. So they’re going to keep pumping the money in as long as they’ve got it. But even their wallets are finite.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      As someone who has regularly used virtual worlds for 20 years, the whole Metaverse thing was so hilarious.

      Like, Facebook did not invent 3D online worlds, there are 3D online worlds older than Facebook.

      “But wait, metaverse is not just 3D Virtual Worlds.”

      Which inecitably leads to "ok, so its just “The Internet”.

      As for the “Constantly being wrong.” At somepoint, these people forgot that “having an idea” does not mean “Having a useful idea.” You hear arguments about all these flash in the pan bull shit concepts like “People said the same thing about the internet or the iPhone.” Yeah, and they said the same thing about a dozen other new idea that time forgot for every Internet or every iPhone idea that took off. Not every idea is “the next big thing”. Statisrically, most ideas are “Not ever a thing.”

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        As for the “Constantly being wrong.” At somepoint, these people forgot that “having an idea” does not mean “Having a useful idea.”

        Absolutely. They can’t fathom anymore that, just because they want something, it doesn’t mean that anyone else does. Or that they’re not already getting it, even if they do.

        You hear arguments about all these flash in the pan bull shit concepts like “People said the same thing about the internet or the iPhone.”

        Right, and I always think, “both of those solved actual problems that hadn’t been solved before.” Problems that I remember feeling, as a person who was conscious in the 90s: the need for quick, efficient, long-distance information transfer, and the problem that computers were stuck in your house when a lot of what you needed them for was while you were walking around.

        Cryptocurrency didn’t solve a problem that most people feel (and, I would argue, it didn’t efficiently solve a problem that anyone actually has). The metaverse didn’t solve any new problems at all (as you noted, the one thing it could do that anyone wanted was something that was already being done). And AI was already being used for anything it was good for long before Sam Altman convinced a dozen billionaires to give him multiple small-countries’-GDPs.

        And since being a good businessman really means finding a solution and offering a product that solves it, they’re just proving how bad they are at business.

  • mech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The lead-up is a bit long, yeah.
    But the crash at the end is worth the wait.

  • itkovian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 hours ago

    AI has the momentum only from investors and banks. But unfortunately, the paying customers are few and far between. Also, don’t forget that these companies are losing money even on the paying customers. There doesn’t seem to be any path to profitability for these companies. So, no wonder everyone is saying it’s a bubble.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I use AI some, but if it vanished, it woukd not change anything and I would just go back to my okd ways.

      Also, my two cents, the biggest hinderance is how prudish they are, because they are disgustingly prudish. How many but tech pushes worked because of porn? Most of these mainstream AIs just shit the bed at the most PG tier conversations or actions. Basically, the current push by the hugely conservative nanny state is clashing with these people’s desire to push this stuff into the Mainstream.

    • ExtremeUnicorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I thought it was also considered a bubble because so much money has been invested in all those projects now that couldn’t possibly return any revenue in 100 years or so.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s even worse than that, because the more users they have the more expensive the tools are to run. It’s the opposite of how economy of scale is supposed to work. I forget the exact numbers but apparently for every dollar they make they lose 2 or 3x that.

        Every new iteration of their models is also exponentially more expensive to run. They desperately need the output to improve because of how inconsistent it is, but doing that only increases the money hemorrhage.

        There’s basically no way out from what I’ve been reading about it.

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Capitalism doesn’t breed enough innovation for new reasons. That’s why they need AI, to come up with new bullshit.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Sort of, except this time instead of it being millions of homes about to be foreclosed on its like 10 multibillion dollar companies, so the real problem is who is positioned to buy those companies when their share price crashes and they need to be sold for peanu… fuck it’s Trump isn’t it? In 2 months we’ll be using MicroTrump Werd to write reports and Tesla Xsell to build spreadsheets, but only when we can navigate our way through a minefield of vibecoded slop and ads for ICE.

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          You jest but USGov already owns 10% of Intel, the seal’s been cracked, and it’d be a suitably fascist move.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Considering that both Intel and AMD originally grew up on government contracts, It’s a wonder that the government doesn’t own 49% of each.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Well everyone’s index-based investments will also take a nose dive to be fair. So that’s going to be a lot of people’s retirement funds set back by several years, maybe a decade.

          • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            they should be fine so long as their funds freak out and sell the dip … obviously the people about to retire might have to hold off for a while

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              That’s managed funds, which are costly and don’t tend to perform better than index funds in the long term (unless your fund is managed by Warren Buffett). Index funds will by definition take a huge fall because like 30% of the S&P 500 by market cap for an example is heavily AI-invested companies (just a couple of companies at that).

              I’ve moved all of mine to European and Asian indexes to be less affected when it happens, but since I was using a national pension system fund up till now, it’ll take until like May or whatever till the move is complete. So I hope there’s no crash before that at least. At least any new payments already go to the funds I’ve selected rather and can sell on a whim, rather than the old system where the bank chose the exact ETFs and I can only sell/move funds 3 times a year and have to apply for it beforehand.

              But anyone else who’s still stuck in that system with a composite fund dominated by US-based index ETFs, will take a massive plunge when it happens.

        • alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Damn if only there were some sort of alternative not owned by anyone and built by the community. If I’m making impossible wishes I’d also want it to be free to use. Maybe even open source.

          Nah that would never work. Who would put in that kind of effort for free? Silly idea.

          • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Sadly my company has complete say over the platforms I use when at work. Given their scramble to adopt copilot with little or no obvious benefits and unknown depth of security flaws, I don’t hold much hope that they will pivot to an entire new platform suite on Microsoft’s collapse …

  • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I fear it never will, because I suspect whoever is pushing for all of this dissident tracking on the Internet is propping it up with dark money.

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    More like, the AGI that those CEOs are saying will solve all the world’s problems as long as we keep giving them billions of dollars and more data centers.