• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    Yep that’s about the level of intelligence I would expect from Meta’s AI safety director.

    Doing the one thing that you’re never supposed to do, letting an AI loose on anything sensitive.

    For her next trick she’s going to run while holding scissors in one hand and a bottle of boiling acid in the other. What could go wrong.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    She’s lucky all she got were some deleted emails.
    Given how insecure this whole ordeal is and the fact that she gave it full access to her REAL Inbox, someone could have phished the ever living fuck out of her and Meta just by sending an email with malicious prompt written on white text or hiding messages zero-width characters and other wacky antics.
    Real Looney Tunes shit, congratulations to all involved.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      You wouldn’t even need to hide it since apparently she wasn’t paying attention.

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    What’s funny, kind of like people, but saying “do not do xyz” makes it more likely because the context “xyx” is now in the prompt.

  • renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    6 hours ago

    you can like… enforce this rule programatically? you don’t have to say “pretty please” to ai? basically, when AI requests some potentially unwanted thing (like deleting an email), this request goes through a proxy that asks the human for confirmation. Also you can have a safe word set up in the chat interface to act as a killswitch. I thought these are ABCs of ai safety but apparently these are foreign concepts to this “safety director”

    • BadlyDrawnRhino @aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      You say that, but who do you think the AIs will go after first if they ever do develop actual intelligence? In that scenario, simple manners can go a long way!

    • underscores@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      The people that design AI tools don’t implement guardrails because then they’d have to admit AI is not ready for the shit they’re trying to make

    • zqps@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The people who internalize this would never engage with a chatbot in this way in the first place. To them this is another intelligence they’re conversing with, where you get what you want by following social decorum and enforcing your will amounts to abuse.

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Run? Like physically run? You install a server on your hardware without setting up remote access? Even plug and play one-click solutions like tailscale??

  • yogurtwrong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I hate how Apple users feel the need to call their computer by the brand. It really makes me cringe.

    It is called “a computer”

    Maybe “PC”

    “box” if you really have to flex that UNIX

    They should treat their computers less like a sports car and more like a van

    • ThunderQueen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean, isnt that the entire point of Apple? Brand recognition and percieved status attributed to said brand. Its like rappers and gucci belts or country artists and ford pickups

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        In slight fairness to them the Mac mini isn’t actually pretty decent PC, unlike their laptops which are absolutely not worth the money. Although maybe these days $400 for 16 gigabytes of RAM is actually market value.

      • AlphaOmega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Every time someone organically refers to their computer as an Apple or Mac, an Apple marketing executive creams their pants.

        • ThunderQueen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          …thats kind of how branding has always been under capitalism to a certain extent. Get people to think your brand is the best so they buy more instead of whatever is convenient. It has definitely gotten more extreme but i think that has more to do with the applications of what we are talking about.

          Cell phones are embedded into nearly every aspect of our lives. So the brand symbolism carries that weight for people too.

          Previously, brands like cocacola still had a death grip on society but it was one specific sector. So while it created a sort of cult vibe, it was definitely different.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I get what you are saying and generally agree, but!

            It actually was not always the way it is now.

            Play RDR2.

            Look at the advertisements for things, actually read them.

            They’re actually pretty accurate to the advertisements of the time.

            They are extremely based on ‘facts’, convicing the prospective buyer that the product is the best product, is very useful, can do this, is unique in this way.

            Of course, sometimes the ‘facts’ are lies… but the general idea is not to sell a … emotion, or personality, or element of identity, or sense of belonging.

            Its almost always to convince the buyer that this product is useful to them, and is priced reasonably for what it can do.

            The turning point away from this was mostly or largely due to Edward Bernaise, the nephew of Sigmund Freud.

            More or less, he applied Freud’s ideas and some of his own, some of others, to marketing.

            His first big hit was angling Cigarettes as ‘Torches of Freedom’ to suffragettes.

            At that point in time, smoking tobacco was generally seen as disgusting and low class for women, but not for men.

            So, he was basically the first guy that went around and paid people to smoke cigarettes, while being trendy, with pre-designed slogans.

            … It worked.

            Because he was selling identity, not products, and this is much more effective.

            Prior to that… brands basically were just built on the reputation of their products.

            Now… now its so insane that for many say, video games and movies… far more time of the entire experience of the product is the hype train, the controversy, the twitter wars… prior to the product even coming out.

            And then, its often just a flash in the pan.

            But… you will still have dedicated fans, ongoing internet arguments, for literal years, even decades, since the last time anyone involved actually viewed or played the product.

            Thats all designed for, to maximize the chances of that happening.

            Marketing literally is applied psychology.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      yeah I sat there for a few seconds trying to figure out the relevance

      turns out, it wasn’t relevant

      instant loss of attention and judging of their character

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Ehhhh as an owner of five or six windows computers, four Linux machines, and a couple Apple computers, I always specify which machine I’m referring to if I’m talking about something I did/something that happened on one of them in case it could be pertinent.

  • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I love how these models apologize like they mean it. It doesn’t mean it. It doesn’t feel bad, and it will do it again.

    Apologies mean “I made a mistake and I learned from it so it won’t repeat.”

    Sure it claims it added more notes to it’s config, but if it ignored the rules before, what makes you think that new rules are going to change anything?

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If anything its context includes that it makes mistakes now and details about them. The mostly output is to create the same mistakes again

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They behave exactly a child does when a parent forces an apology.

      They have the words they’re expect to say so they do say them but they don’t undersranr why, they definitely don’t mean it and they lack the restrain to not doing whatever they apologized for over and over.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      12 hours ago

      But it’s adding it to a text file that eats up a ton of tokens and routinely gets ignored!

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That MEMORY. md file won’t do shit if the AI doesn’t read it.

      I give it 2 hours before it stops reading it until prompted again.

    • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Apologies mean “I made a mistake and I learned from it so it won’t repeat.”

      I beg to differ. An apology means that you feel bad about harm inflicted upon others. To prove the point: You apologize when you’re late due to circumstances that are outside of your control. Or when you accidentally bump into someone on the bus when the driver slams the break.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        There are two kinds of apologies.

        Customary, and Genuine.

        They’re describing a genuine apology.

        You’re describing a customary apology.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Apologies mean “I made a mistake and I learned from it so it won’t repeat.”

      At best it might not make the same mistake again if that memory is in the current context. But more likely: It will not remember.

      Although latest Gemini in particular has much more room for “remembering” things, still.

      But “I made a mistake”? It is not self-aware in any way shape or form to the degree where “I made a mistake” carries any real meaning.

    • frigge@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Apologies mean “I made a mistake and I learned from it so it won’t repeat.”

      yeah enough humans don’t know that as well unfortunately. But yeah obviously LLMs don’t understand anything. That’s not how they work

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Apologies mean “I made a mistake and I learned from it so it won’t repeat.”

      If only some people meant it that way too!

  • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Can someone explain to mr why these people are buying Mac Minis to run this in a “safe” environment and then they go on and connect it to the internet and give the AI credentials to all their cloud accounts? This seems excessively moronic to me? Am I missing something?

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, you’re not missing anything.

      They’re morons.

      Thats our ruling elite; a bunch of fucking morons with egos and low self awareness at best, literally child raping and murdering pedophiles at worst.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They are buying the Mac Minis since they are a cheap way to run a server where this would work. They aren’t create a safe environment for AI, but an access point on local hardware.

    • Cort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Arm power efficiency, and unified ram at a fairly low price (at least compared to current ram pricing).

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t think you’re missing anything. I’m pretty sure this is the trend. People buy Mac Minis, probably don’t even download a local model, FA, and FO.