• Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    The fact that we went from Teamspeak to Skype to Discord and back to Teamspeak again is wild.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In my experience, Matrix has a lot of misleading functionalities that drive people into enough of a false sense of security to out themselves.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Weird how they are good at digging up the past relationship between the matrix team prior donators with the mosad. but failed to mention not even once that matrix’s biggest advantage is its federated nature.

    So imagine you have a selfhosted matrix server and you want to invite a friend over for a chat but this friend already has an account at his other friend’s server. in Matrix he doesn’t have to make an account on every server their interlocutor is in, he just sends his messages, like its done over email, or here on lemmy (fediverse). this is an advantage other software like fluxer of stoat don’t have. and I doubt they will able to add it anytime soon, as the work needed is probably huge and would need years of work to make a proper secure e2e federate messaging solution.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Guy literally told people the criteria he was using, one of which was searching for things like that because that’s the reason for the video in the first place, the Discord exodus due to deep state ties. He admits his knowledge is limited. Weird how hard it is for some people to see things from someone else’s point of view.

    • GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Uh what the fuck how about any connection to mossad should be a death sentence for a software project

        • exu@feditown.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Tbf, there were no alternatives at the time when most people moved here. Now there is one with Piefed, I really should move my server.

          • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            It seems like an option, but gonna say, having seen some of their biggest contributors try to push people into switching communities over to those moderated by community hoarders also heavily into anarcho-marxism politics - not really getting rid of the problem, are we.

          • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yep, and yet almost anyone who has spent any time on Lemmy knows what I’m referring to (whether they recognize it and do so as a problem is another matter)

            • No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              59 minutes ago

              I have no idea what you are referring too, but I only look at my subscribed communities, so I have no idea what’s going on in the “Lemmy meta.” Being able to only see the communities I subscribe too is one of my three primary reasons for coming here.

            • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I know what you’re referring to, and I agree it’s likely off-putting to many, but not agreeing with the developer’s politics is on an entirely different level compared to suspecting a platform may be developed and compromised by state actors.

                • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 minutes ago

                  Again though, that’s a social problem, one that can even be eliminated through defederation. It’s not an ‘abandon all ships’ type of problem.

                  To be clear I am fully acknowledging that that situation isn’t good. I am very specifically pointing out that a state actor controlling and developing the platform is a much bigger problem, they are not comparable.

      • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I understand the concern, and I find it fishy that the matrix team didn’t try to address that (maybe they did but I just didn’t come across that)

        but on the other hand many governments and ministries like the French MOD have deployed matrix locally for their private use. not sure they want to use a software that the mossad can directly tap into

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      EDIT: changed to more accurately represent how Matrix operates.

      The issue is that due to the way Matrix is structured, it essentially spreads copies of unencrypted metadata to every instance participating in those rooms, So it’s federated, but difficult to actually keep metadata from being spread around even if you don’t federate with the main Matrix server, if any server you do federate with dies, it’ll get spread there. You’d have to be extremely cautious who you federate with to avoid that, or not federate at all, which defeats the purpose.

      As an alternative, Movim, which uses XMPP and is also federated, does not spread meta data around like that.

      • squidie@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 minute ago

        What Metadata is shared if I may ask? Content should be encrypted and therefore private. This might not be perfect but should already be a step up from discord right?

      • who@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The issue is that due to the way Matrix is structured, it essentially copies ALL of your serber’s metadata to every instance, including the main Matrix server.

        This is false. Data is only copied to instances participating in the relevant rooms.

        You’d have to be extremely cautious who you federate with to avoid that, or not federate at all,

        Or just don’t invite users into your private rooms if they come from servers that you want to exclude.

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Agh, you’re quite right. Thanks for correction. I crossed my wires and misremembered how it worked after reading this article about it a while back. Edited my previous comment to reflect that.

          I suppose in theory that shouldn’t be an insurmountable problem, though in Matrix’s case it’s a big roadblock, as the main Matrix server hosted by Matrix themselves has unfortunately become the defacto main server that most people use, which means not federating with it massively reduces the ability for someone to just be able to seamlessly hop onto your server unless they too are on one of the smaller, less popular servers.

          In the example given in the video, it would likely be a bit of a deal breaker if you met someone in an online game somewhere, and then invited them to your self-hosted Matrix server, only to discover they are on the main potentially israeli intelligence-tied Matrix instance, meaning you’d have to explain they need to create an account elsewhere to be able to join your instance. It would be pretty awful UX.

          • who@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 minutes ago

            in Matrix’s case it’s a big roadblock, as the main Matrix server hosted by Matrix themselves has unfortunately become the defacto main server that most people use, which means not federating with it massively reduces the ability for someone to just be able to seamlessly hop onto your server unless they too are on one of the smaller, less popular servers.

            Maybe. But on the other hand, Matrix is only just beginning to become known among gamers, and there are a lot of us. Seems like a good time for people to stand up a new servers and invite the gaming masses.

            it would likely be a bit of a deal breaker if you met someone in an online game somewhere, and then invited them to your self-hosted Matrix server, only to discover they are on the main potentially israeli intelligence-tied Matrix instance,

            I’ve seen occasional claims of that for a few years now, yet not once have I seen any credible evidence of it. Not in their own weekly reports. Not from journalists. Not in spec drafts or issue trackers or organizational structure. Nowhere. This particular legend smells more like fearmongering to me. At the most, it looks more like the distant connection that the internet has to the US military: Sure, part of its origin story might have been there, but it’s not relevant any more.

            (Also, if your goal is to avoid Israeli intelligence-tied people seeing your room meta-data, you probably shouldn’t be inviting strangers to join. After all, there’s no way to know who they really are, regardless of what homeserver they use or what chat platform you’re on.)

            For what it’s worth, account portability (giving people a way to switch homeservers) is on the Matrix roadmap.

            • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Seems like a good time for people to stand up a new servers and invite the gaming masses.

              Personally I don’t think it’s ready as a Discord replacement, based on the troubles displayed in the video, such as not being able to get things like video calls or screenshare working easily when self-hosting.

              I’ve seen occasional claims of that for a few years now, yet not once have I seen any credible evidence of it.

              I’m assuming you haven’t seen the GN video in the OP yet, but they go into that connection, which they personally feel is bad enough to not use it. The issue is that Matrix was created and funded by Amdocs, an Israeli company with possible connections to Israeli intelligence.

              The matrix foundation themselves admit to being funded by Amdocs, such as here on their blog:

              As unpopular as VC funding is in some circles, the Matrix community owes a huge debt of thanks to Element’s investors (Status, Notion, firstminute, Dawn, Automattic, Protocol Labs and Metaplanet) and Amdocs for funding over $50M of work on both Matrix and Element since 2017.

              and here in their FAQ:

              How is Matrix[.]org funded? For the first three years of Matrix’s development (2014-2017), most of the core contributors worked for Amdocs, who paid for them to work fulltime on Matrix. In July 2017, Amdocs considered the project to be sufficiently successful that it could now self-support and so stopped funding.

              They also specifically attempt to offer their chat services to law enforcement, such as the time they bought a booth at a law enforcement convention, which caused this controversy.

              • who@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I don’t have a problem with the org offering services to law enforcement, governments, businesses, etc. Funding like this is how they are able to pay the bills without turning to venture capital or user exploitation.

                I did see the GN video. They explicitly stated that they didn’t find a hard link. And, as you pointed out, Amdocs stopped funding almost a decade ago.

                You seem to have made up your mind, though. I won’t try to change it.

                • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 minutes ago

                  Amdocs stopped funding it, but Martix and the company developing Element are both still made up of ex-Amdocs people. If they are connected to Isreali intelligence, it’s not as though they would suddenly aren’t potential agents just because they stopped being officially funded by Amdocs.

      • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        XMPP is a shitshow of its own, very fragmented architecture. different incomplete implementations. each server can chose which features (extensions) to turn on and which not) so you can’t be sure that the person you are trying to talk to on the other server can have access to the same features, like threads or voip.

        I have previously read that omemo 2 implementation is insecure. my previous experience with it 4 years ago made me give up after encrypted messages were getting lost when messaging between different clients

        there is no one flagship app for XMPP that works cross platefrom and has all features implemented. heck I can’t even find a windows that support voip. and their will be none. cause xmpp has lost all traction.

        As for Movim, I hate using web apps. bad user experience in general. add to that I don’t remember it ever having been audited

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I have previously read that omemo 2 implementation is insecure.

          It’s not insecure. The origin of that myth is this blog, however the creator deleted a response left by one of the OMEMO developers, which explained that the newer versions of OMEMO were essentially open betas, and that when a final stable release is made, only then should the client developers implement a newer version.

          The Blog author’s response to deleting that comment was:

          “I’ll make an edit later about the protocol version thing, but I’m not interested in having questions answered. My entire horse in this race is for evangelists to f** off and leave me alone. That’s it. That’s all I want.”

          Which I think shows it was done in bad faith.

          You can read a longer response I left in regards to that here, if you’re interested.

          there is no one flagship app for XMPP that works cross platefrom and has all features implemented.

          The Movim client is installable on all platforms as a PWA, which prevents confusion. But if you use other clients, it is true that they have differing feature support.

          heck I can’t even find a windows that support voip. and their will be none.

          Movim is that client. It supports Group voice/video calls and screensharing w/ audio share (a recent addition, which currently requires a chromium based browser to share the audio). Sure, it’s not a native app, but neither is Discord (it’s just another Electron app).

          We need a federated solution now, otherwise we’ll all just hop to another centralized platform with all the pitfalls that brings.

          As for Movim, I hate using web apps. bad user experience in general.

          As the video mentions, it’s worth some inconvenience for the privacy, and currently there is no other federated Discord alternative besides XMPP and Matrix (and matrix has way too many issues to even consider, IMHO).

          The community adopting Movim or supporting it with donations and bug reports will help it develop and become more polished, and there are efforts to standardize a common XMPP package platform to make deployment simpler and easier. The entire landscape for Discord alternatives all have their downsides, XMPP is the only current option that could become a long-term, permanent solution.

      • rklm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I’ve had matrix and element set up on my personal domain for a while, but I’ve only used them for evaluation so far. The system and network resources used are HUGE…

        I’ve been setting up movim and a seperate xmpp server for a little while, and I have some initial opinions:

        • xmpp (prosody) appears to be much better optimised than matrix (synapse)
        • matrix and element are much easier to set up
        • movim is a huge PITA to deploy yourself (especially in a container… you’re basically on your own at the moment)
        • xmpp requires tcp ports and ssl certs that should be easy to set up… unless you’re on a cgnat network. Matrix can be set up through a cloudflare tunnel with https no problem, but xmpp requires some networking elbow grease.
        • the mandatory certificates probably make the xmpp network safer?
        • Even with the mautrix discord bridge copying the exact layout of discord channels into element, movim seems more familiar to me. I haven’t really had enough time to evaluate movim, but it seems like it’s trying to appeal to discord users, and element is clearly not. Element feels like a well funded enterprise tool that is doing its own thing.
        • commet (with 2 m’s) chat is a very faithful discord clone for matrix, but it’s very barebones.

        Either way, I am gonna deploy both and let my friends/discord channel users decide what works best.

        I’m rooting for xmpp at the moment, but I will be happy with anything that is self hosted, encrypted and federated.

        Hopefully I don’t end up having to maintain both protocols with a bridge!

        • vividspecter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I know that part of the issue is the actual protocol, but you might try alternative matrix servers such as tuwunel for potentially better performance.

          • rklm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Thanks for the link, I’m happy to give it a try.

            I just recently migrated all of my stuff to dockerized services, so swapping out pieces should be pretty easy

        • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          movim is a huge PITA to deploy yourself (especially in a container… you’re basically on your own at the moment)

          Yeah, hopefully the dev or the community work on making it easier to deploy in a container at some point.

          but it seems like it’s trying to appeal to discord users,

          It is! But that focus is somewhat recent. The dev recently started a funding campaign to accelerate development, and just landed channels with rooms last week, so it’s still rough around the edges, but the pace that they’re implementing this stuff is impressive. They’re later going to work on having drop-in voice rooms as well.

          • rklm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Despite the challenge getting it set up, I have high hopes for movim! I like the direction they’re going now.

            I did end up successfully deploying it in a compose stack (despite this issue), and I’ll probably submit a fix if they don’t get to it before I do.

            If anyone is interested, I can share the details about how I got it going.

  • popcar2@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Fluxer is the most promising one so far. It doesn’t have easy self-hosting yet, but it’s in development. What exists so far is pretty good though.

  • recursive_recursion@piefed.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Stoat seems to be the one my friend group is most interested in, currently I’m waiting to see which one is better in the next couple of months or so.

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Did you guys also consider Fluxer? I tried Stoat first, but the main instance is really slow and there are some video features disabled due to high cost. Which is totally fair.

      Fluxer seems to have more features and their main instance is a lot snappier. They’re also accepting donations via Plutonium. Which seems to be helping with the server costs.

      Both are AGPLv3, with Fluxer recently saying they’re gonna remove their CLA so that it’s true Open Source.

  • Currently hosting a couple of zulip instances for communities that had been on discord. I really like the way it handles topics/threading and they make hosting a breeze. I reported in an upgrade recently and it was < 30 minutes between me reporting it and getting code to solve my issue pushed to the repos. Wild.

    10/10 recommend if voice/video are not a focus.

      • Skunk@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 minutes ago

        How?

        I manage two Zulip servers so I’m interested of knowing how it is perceived by outsiders.

        To me (to us) it is quite simple, you write in the topic with the correct title, fediverse stuff goes in fediverse stuff, video games in video games, etc etc.

        If someone makes a mistake, any user on a PC can move the message to the correct topic (doesn’t work with the mobile app).

    • Vegafjord eo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      I dont see why people would downvote an honest question. Probably going to discourage more people from asking questions. Is that what we want?

    • popcar2@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They only delayed them. They’re still hoping to force ID verification for accessing specific content later this year.

    • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They are boiling the frog, just like whatsapp did in 2021 remember the uproar about whatsapp data sharing with business accounts and stuff, whatsapp played the long game delayed the change, let the anger die and everyone just stayed.

      Reddit took the tough approach in 2023. they didn’t budge. people stopped boycotting and went back to reddit shortly after.

      Boycotts don’t work

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Boycotts work 100% of the time of people actually follow through on them. We’ve seen this time and time again. Most recently with Jimmy Kimmel.

    • Not really. They’re still harvesting/monitoring everyone’s chats and are moving forward with age verification, to include behavior-based age verification. They’re just hiring a different scummy vendor to handle the age checks.