• lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 minute ago

      Greatest con the government ever pulled was convincing the masses that state law = right. Way I see it, there are five primary laws and each region’s society and ruler values their hierarchy independently: State, Ethical/Natural, Religious, Corporate, Moral. Each can influence the other. Cutting off from the corporations a cloud-dependent device you paid money to possess is no doubt right, and ethically legal

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Arch’s package management is actually the ideal, in my opinion. Official repositories for the stuff the distro maintainers want to officially support, a user-maintained AUR for other common packages, and the ability to build your own software with the Arch Build System, and letting pacman know where everything is. In a sense, the stuff in the official repositories have a privileged position, and you should be aware of the difference between the AUR and the official repositories, but you’re still always in control of what software is installed.

      The AUR packages and user-specific builds can be thought of as side loading, and the distinction can matter in some circumstances. So I’m ok with having another name for different installation/upgrade/update methods.

        • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I remember the on-hook and off-hook commands, and I remember calling the cradle that old land lines sat on/in being called the hook. When was the tether called the hook?

          Don’t get me wrong, I’m not being rhetorical here as a gotcha. My memory just ain’t what she used to be and I’d like to remember.

          • Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I just remembered one of the first “apps” on my android eris was a hook. It let me plug my phone into my laptop and use my mobile data on the pc. Thats all i remembered. Got the phone as it came out so end of 2009.

    • Grostleton@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Sideloading is an all encompassing term for when you change the physical orientation of your device so that up/down becomes right/left.

    • pewpew@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      According to Google yes, because the Play Store is the “official” way of installing software.

      But personally I hate this mentality and I don’t want a centralized and controlled way of installing software

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If I have to install an app store I don’t consider it to be the ‘official’ method. By default my phone doesn’t have it, a lot of android forks don’t, but if I have to break the law to add it, I guess I’ll stick with manually installing packages.

  • Saapas@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sideloading is an old and well established term for it when it comes to phones though. Sideloading is installing stuff outside of app stores

    • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Before phones that was the only way to install apps though.

      Maybe we should have a term for the inverse, like ‘wallgardening’, or ‘bootlocking’, or ‘corputing’, or ‘inshilling’? 🤔

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Before phones

        But the discussion is specifically about phones…? I’ve never heard anyone use sideloading in a different context

        • grandma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Phones are just computers except they fit in your pocket and have a cellular connection. Distinction without a (meaningful) difference

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Phones are a specific type of computer. I wonder if some madlad hates the term “smart phone” so much that they’re out there calling them computers and confusing everyone.

            • ‹Hexa«Back›@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              38 minutes ago

              smart phone literally means phone with computer or computer-like abilities, contrary to popular belief, smartphones existed before the iPhone and in fact didn’t have to be a locked down slab of glass

        • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, it’s about phones because they changed established practice, but then why use a new word for what was established practice and not the ‘new’, phone-specific, practice of limiting app availability?

          • Saapas@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Sideloading is a more specific term than just “installing”, it’s more about where you got the software, the process of installing it. So people started using a more specific term to distinguish it from other types of installing.

            Why people choose to adopt one word or another, I dunno. We just started calling it sideloading and that’s been the term for as long as I remember (though very early on I didn’t read or write much in English)

    • hesh@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The point is that today the term only serves to delegitimize what should be accepted practice (installing whatever software you want on the machine you paid for) by making it sound like some secondary/shady behavior. Thus allowing phone manufacturers to maintain their walled gardens and control over consumers.

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Tbf these days it is secondary behaviour. Most people aren’t installing stuff outside of app stores on their phones.

        It would just feel weird changing the words we use because companies started using the same terms too. We had it first!

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Where? Why? Your when makes no sense. Laws take time to craft, so if it was going to happen in a year tops you’d already be seeing these laws being crafted and going through chambers. Where on the planet are these laws being crafted?

        • blarghly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I mean, I don’t want to be all doomer. But big tech companies (Meta in particular, iirc) are the ones pushing for age verification at the OS level. So the laws would be crafted in a corporate office or think tank paid by the corporate office, then presented to lawmakers to approve.