This is the code in the Apollo Guidance Computer for Apollo 11.

It’s part of the LUMINARY sofware, which ran on the AGC on the Lunar Module. It’s meant to check if the landing radar is pointed toward the lunar surface - because the LM went through several orientations, the landing radar could be pointed to the front or the side or down. You’re landing on the Moon. Point it down.

Point is, you have to verify user input. Even if your users are the most meticulous and highly trained individuals in history. You have to see if they’re lying. So you get to the BURNBABY.

Browse the code in GitHub - this code is in THE_LUNAR_LANDING.agc

    • Rose@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      14 hours ago

      GOTOPOOH was actually jargon for Program 00 (Hex), which was (I think?) the AGC’s normal idle routine.

      BURNBABY was an alias for BURN_BABY_BURN which was the lunar descent burn sequence. Or something. I wouldn’t have named it that.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        P00H is hilarious.

        Poop.

        The end of all food, yet also, the beginning of all food.

        Poop is the true neutral ground state from whence all emerges and all returns to.

        … genuienly an incredible name for the idle loop, I am in awe.

        I did not think Maggie Hamilton could be more legendary, but somehow, she is. Damn.

        • mercano@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It’s also something we left on the moon. Bags and bags of it, along with empty food containers and their moonwalking backpacks. It’s not like it’s worth it to haul it back to orbit.

          • Bananskal@nord.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So this is what the Seminal Theory is about. It’s not a meteor or some shit that crashed into the earth from far away.

            It was just actual shit left behind by visitors. That’s us. We’re alien shit.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I wonder if that shit is something approximating a fossil, currently.

            Presumably the radiation would have killed all the fecal bacteria pretty quickly… hell … would the plastic bags have degraded as well?

            • mercano@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 hours ago

              It has been exposed to 336 hours of continuous unfiltered sunlight each lunar day for the past 40+ years. That’s can’t be good for the plastic. The poo is probably dedicated, but I don’t think it’d be fossilized, in the sense of biological material replaced with stone, I don’t think the moon is geologically active enough for that to happen.

              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Is there… a word… for… ‘exposed to the void of space for a prolonged period of time’?

                Yeah I know fossilized isn’t the right word, as thats generally a process that requires water… but i dont know how to say ‘space fossilized’.

                Dehydrated and Irradiated … ?

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Sanitizing user input for the Moon landings.

    Meanwhile in 2026, ask AI to change an authentication phone number and it says, “Sure thing!” And is ABLE to do it.

    • Bananskal@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t understand what this comment is meant to convey. Could you explain a bit further?

      • ugo@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s trying to convey that software and engineering discipline has gone to shit. Software written to have some of the most skilled humans at the given task in 69 still had safeguards to double check that the user, despite being one of the most eminent experts, did not provide incorrect input.

        Fast forward to 2026 and things have worsened to the point where ostensible “engineers” deploy systems that allow attackers to access people’s accounts simply by asking a bot, which blindly trusts the attackers.

        I don’t know yet to which degree I agree, but that’s what the comment is meant to convey in my interpretation.

      • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The first one insisted to make sure one of the most competent human beings who ever existed oriented a thing downward in order to not die during a very well-rehearsed procedure.

        The second one is a reference to social media companies “outsourcing” support to chatbots with no intelligence and plenty of control, allowing people to prompt said chatbots into giving them other people’s accounts.

        • Bananskal@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I knew I should’ve waited until I hadn’t just woken up before trying to understand the comment. 😆