• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Do I want more memory or do I wait for two years…

    I wait for two years. As long as the existing memory modules doesn’t break, Linux will continue to be happy with existing amount.

    If you are on windows, good luck.

    • Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      I built a PC for work (I’m going to take it with me when I leave) and I bought used adata ram (2x32gb) with a lifetime warranty on it. I immediately needed to send one of the sticks for warranty. I bought the initial set of ram in May, and yesterday I paid roughly the same for a used set of 2x16gb. The price of the 32gb sticks is prohibitively expensive now. I’m betting the price only goes up, just wish I would be at 128gb rather than 96gb.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 minutes ago

        We could have been so rich if we could have seen the future. Just buy tons of memory modules at low prices five years ago and sell them now. What a profit.

        Its not like memory tech has changed so much either.

    • pool_spray_098@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, I splurged on some hardware upgrades with great shame almost 2 years ago because I was preparing for the idiotic tariffs, expecting modest price increases.

      I did not expect a 5x. So glad that I did it. It would no longer be an option.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I mean, today I saw a chocolate company ad saying no AI was needed. For chocolate. Anti-AI in a chocolate ad.

      If Sees Candy is getting in on AI hate to sell shit, obviously people are tired of this crap. The bubble will burst.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      and if it doesn’t, let em have it. I’ll cancel my internet, and start overloading all other infrastructure with confusion from not knowing how to deal with humans and paper…

      idgaf. I can’t and won’t be forced to comply to a subscription.

  • Haley@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    10 hours ago

    And people who have an issue with this are called luddites

    Absolute clown show

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They confuse us with legitimate technophobes.

      My stepmother was a technophobe. She read articles about school shootings in the US, and thought if I got addicted to video games like Quake, I’ll be buying a machine gun from the black market, then end up as a murderer. Yes, she also had a moral panic about drug use, all while she was a borderline alcoholic. The farce in it was that while I wasn’t allowed to play any Quake games, there was no harm in Unreal games, which arguably are better. The tragedy in it was that she tried her best to steer me away from computers, giving me some disadvantage in college, also she lied to the doctors about my first seizure to make it seem like it was due to the computer, which lead to the doctors not doing tests besides EEG and strobe lights. Once social media rolled out, she somewhat changed her mind on the subject, though she was still ignorant enough to think “software developer” and “CNC programmer” are the same, and almost got me a job at a local factory (she feared that if I lived on Budapest for a bit longer, I’d get some lung disease, because big city equals bad air).

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      We’ve been told historical lies. People who have an issue with this are like Luddites, but that’s because the Luddites were justified too!

      They weren’t against technology; they were against it being used to abuse and exploit them as workers.

      • Haley@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’ve only heard that term being used to insult, that’s actually a real thing?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          ·
          8 hours ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddites

          The Luddites were members of a 19th-century movement of English textile workers who protested the usage of certain types of automated machinery owing to their concerns relating to worker pay, labour savings, child labour, working conditions, and output quality. They often destroyed said machines in organised raids. Members of the group referred to themselves as Luddites, self-described followers of “Ned Ludd”, a legendary weaver whose name was used as a pseudonym in threatening letters to mill owners and government officials.

        • k0e3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’ve never heard it used as an insult. How is it even supposed to be offensive? “Har har you’re a person who doesn’t like tech”?

          • plateee@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Less of “you’re a person who doesn’t like tech” and more “you’re not with the times/are scared of the future”… which is pretty close to some messaging from clankers.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    No big. Guess I’ll have to wait another year before upgrading my laptop. Sorry for the loss of business.

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Chip companies are cutting off consumers on purpose. They lost your $100 business and gained $1000 sales on the same products

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They want you to get a cloud computer subscription. They want you to buy a Windows Portal, or whatever garbage small “terminal” device they will come up, and force regulators to make it be called a “fully fledged computer”.

      • Napster153@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve called it. Laptops and PCs will be outlawed and hunted down like hiding a radio unit in WW2. Think Farenheit 451 levels of dogma

  • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Give it 10 years and civilians won’t be able to own PCs… We will be forced to the cloud computers. And by that time AI surveillance and profiling will already have its infrastructure built.

    • MidnightMarauder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Its already here. Most “regular” users already depend for most part of there digital life on subscription based cloud computing. Al lot of people don’t even own a PC anymore, only mobile devices.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I was there on the first wave of the cloud boom (2012-ish), it’s biggest pushers got really angry that we weren’t up to give up our computers for “sleek, slim, and elegant” devices that would make wires “obsolete” at least in the home, so we can finally live in a sci-fi movie. They literally wanted us to use “browser app” DAWs that would do it’s computing on the cloud, then they realized many of us would like to record music, run live effects, etc.

    • nehal3m@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We need to figure out how to do our daily things with very few computing resources. Gaming and heavy workloads excepted, most things we do ought to be possible on 15 year old CPU’s and 2GB. All we need is efficiency and low expectations. Fuck em.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It was already possible to do that. Then Electron came in and developers thought it was better to just release stupid apps that take 4 GB of RAM each.

        • rbos@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Not even. The Intel 8008 didn’t even break 1MHz and that was a few years later.

          I don’t know what they used on the moon landing, though.

          • Dave.@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            52 minutes ago

            I don’t know what they used on the moon landing, though.

            An efficient, real-time multitasking software stack on a 2MHz processor with the equivalent of ~4K of RAM and 64K of ROM.

            Smart enough to handle being accidentally overloaded by its operators and still balance a spacecraft on a single engine and land on the moon while doing multiple reboots to clear its software stack. It would work its way down a list of “fly a spacecraft” tasks from critical, to informational, to just monitoring, with a certain amount of time allocated to complete the whole list. If it ran out of time, it would drop everything, perform the equivalent of a reboot with navigation parameters parked in memory, and then start again at the most critical task.

            Apollo 11’s crew accidentally left their rendezvous radar (which was checking on the location of the command module in orbit) in a mode that constantly poked the computer with “pay attention to me” interrupts, and it couldn’t service the radar and run through it’s task list completely while it was on descent to the lunar surface.

            To the programming team’s credit, this just caused an overload alarm a few times and the mission completed successfully.

            The Apollo programmers pretty much created the whole software engineering field from scratch in the 10 years before 1969.

      • Leafimo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        And even gaming is possible with those specs: retro gaming and emulation, thousands of excellent games