• [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    283
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Because they all use the illegal Colossus 2 data centre from SpaceX/XAi/fascism central and that data centre went down.

    Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI all have contracts with them.

    When that illegally running environmental disaster of data centre goes down, all those services all go over capacity and you get 502 rate limit errors.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Does that mean Musk’s businesses have access to everything people do on the systems that use their data centers?

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        99
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Generally no, because most hosting companies would have something baked into SLA/SLO contracts, but all of this shit is done so illegally and shadily now, I wouldn’t put a hard “no” on that possibility.

        • devfuuu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Nobody can verify that those “contracts” are actually being honored. We are all assuming the fascists will self police themselves out of good will.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Not true. I’ve been involved in litigation with both AWS and Google over unsecured comms that were defined as being TLS secured in SLA/SLO contracts and found not to be. Not that anything nefarious was happening necessarily, but the expectation is clear.

            Whether these asshats even check for such requirements with a Musk run company right now 🤷

            It COULD possibly be that they are logging every exchange happening at the network fabric between the service layers, but nobody knows unless they intentionally take steps to investigate or accidentally prove it.

        • skvlp@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I hope you’re right, but Elon don’t strike me as the guy whose most compliant to SLA, law, or anything else that might be an inconvenience to him.

          • esc@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 hours ago

            He can’t micromanage everything and regular management will try to comply.

            • bedwyr@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Executives are the biggest cheaters out there. They will only comply if it will hurt them if they don’t, and it’s won’t here, as long as the protection money is produced they don’t have to worry.

            • skvlp@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I agree with that. But I think “the right” data scientists can infer too much from all those AI queries, and I think Elon can abuse that for his own gain.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Impossible to know.

        There are systems for doing things cryptographically secure, but I don’t know much about that.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s kinda surprising,

      I know specifically where one of the big ones hosts its models and its not there, but I guess they could have infrastructure in there.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They’re oversold though, especially prompt caching and the parameter count war

        The US model is that they think more training compute and parameters will result in the winning model, while the Chinese are focusing on RL and parameters efficiency due to compute limits.

          • Dave.@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Always ready to try brute force first. And then some other, less palatable options if that doesn’t work, like slightly less brute force.