You must log in or register to comment.
Just reading about the proton case
so is it that in the Spanish case they were using an iCloud recovery account?
Love it if these memes involved context
Real privacy starts when you check app permissions and stop giving flashlight apps your location.
privacy
is a webapp
???
Left: People that can’t selfhost
Right: People that have never heard of it
We all know privacy is purple, we just can’t agree on the exact shade.
The joke is on you here. Proton is a locked-in CIA honeypot and everybody knows it.
Any evidence to this?
Source: Trust me bro
Coming from an Agent I’ll trust it
We’re actually called officers
I trust you bro
Trust you too
I want another person with neck beard disgusted by both of them using Tor, I2P, Qubes, and GrapheneOS
I just wish we could find each other irl. I’m the tin foil privacy nerd everywhere I go.
…t-that’s us
Proton? The bitcoin company?
No thanks. Fuck them.
hey Peter Griffin, explain the joke.
It’s hilarious that OP thought going full in o proton is the other end of the “I love privacy” spectrum. How the fuck are you here on lemmy and that uneducated and ignorant on all this? These are two people a couple of steps away from each other on one end, not even close to what the meme actually is. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if this was rage bait, because it’s dumb enough to be that. Or a proton shill, which definitely exists here.
This was posted by Proton on Proton subreddit, so yeah, it’s an ad.
This meme format is sexist. Why is it always always always the woman who has the negative side?
What is the meme from? So I can search it on know your meme.
Edit: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-love-video-games-me-too
You would have to be terminally online to be upset over something this trivial
I think it’s a fair point. Anyone could be either person so no one instance of this is directly offensive, but I agree memes like this seem to routinely put down women.
I don’t think op is pissing and shitting and crying over it, there’s just no place to talk about it other than the meme itself. Anyone could criticise your comment in the same way, and it’s just a strawman argument.
-
Third party service run by corpos who pinky promise not to harvest any of your data
-
In-app tool that doesn’t cache your client-side data
Is the woman the negative side on this?
I think that was the intent. Lemmy is extremely anti-Google.
I genuinely wonder what people think they’re using a VPN for. Do they think they’ve outwitted a trillion dollars in surveillance with an $8/mo subscription service?
A VPN is part of a toolset. No tool alone is enough, and they only really work for some porpoises.
Some people think it is enough. Some people think chrome incognito is enough. Some people are wrong.
I’m any case, privacy is a spectrum. I can’t be untraceable by state agents, but I can avoid a lot of non targeted spying.
I’m any case, privacy is a spectrum. I can’t be untraceable by state agents, but I can avoid a lot of non targeted spying.
Absolutely. But then, as often as not, just using the browser feature that doesn’t cache client side data is enough.
I mean it def makes it harder to track.
Ummm yes I am betting people think that. Are they wrong? It makes sense that Google could do that if they really wanted to, but I doubt they do pretty much anything that doesn’t have a profit motive.
-
Incels.
Not everything is sexist queen 💅
Ok. This meme is.
Wut? How? This meme was originally gay lol
If it were the other way around, would it be sexist?
Is it required that any meme with a “good” and “bad” side have no demographic distinction between the sides?
It’s not that this one example is like this, it’s that it seems to always be one way around and not the other, with this meme format
Yes, it would still be sexist if it were the other way around. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a meme with this format which didn’t have a “good” and “bad” side.
I’m genuinely curious what you’d think if they were both thin white straight-coded average-height women but with different hair color.
Well, it would be difficult for a format like that to bring out the biases of meme creators.
One of the reasons this meme format is problematic is that this is a screenshot from “500 Days of Summer” which was a film that was wildly misunderstood by misogynists. The entire point of the film is to show the perspective of the male character, which villainizes the female character when she breaks his heart when she dumps him. But by the end of the movie the viewer is supposed to realize that she did nothing wrong and just wasn’t as in to him as he was into her.
Incels and misogynists everywhere misunderstood the hell out of the themes and message. So it’s not a great movie to take a meme format from.
It’s fish in a barrel.
You don’t always hit, but the odds are stacked heavily in your favor
What? I always thought the guy was the negative side! The woman is the reasonable normie, the guy is the weirdo tinfoil hat nerd!
What even are all those crappy icons?
They are both the bad side in this case.
i think I’ve seen a lot of cases when it’s the other way round.
although if we do the statistics it’ll likely show a bias.
The format doesn’t seem to be inherently. Have you tried interacting with fewer dudes?
This meme format is inherently sexist. Anytime you have a meme format that has both a man and a woman on it, and one side is going to be the “bad” side, it’s always going to bring out the biases of whoever is creating it.
1 Semantics, but that doesn’t sound “inherently” sexist to me.
2 I’m pretty sure it just makes more comedic sense to put the unexpected interpretation on the right (or women’s side), so the “bad side” is different depending on the topic. I personally see this meme more often with the man being a surface level fan of something with the women being unexpectedly deep into the fandom. Like, among the earliest known edits (according to knowyourmeme) is the man just liking sports games with the women liking soulslikes.
They are literally just looking at each other. If anything she has a more annoyed look on her face. He’s thirsty af and shes rolling her eyes at him.
Proton has become a problem for privacy
Something I missed?
The biggest threat is that the CEO is pro maga (cue defenders saying “well ackshully”) and thinks trump is better for his business (cue tankie both sidesers).
The other threat is that at some point proton gave an IP address or something obtained through a legal france->swiss court order allowing french ACABs to hunt and skin the most dangerous game: journalists
Edit, activist I guess https://www.itpro.com/security/privacy/360793/protonmail-criticised-sharing-activists-ip-address-law-enforcement
All companies have to follow legally binding orders. What matters is what they have available to share.
Yes? I mean it’s still important to understand they are subject to those court orders. A lot of privacy whackadoos for some reason think the swiss don’t have a legal system.
Okay, so about #1: Is there more to it than him setting of one single post praising Trump’s business skills? I mean, that’s pretty stupid, but stamping him as “Pro-MAGA” for that seems a bit far fetched still.
About #2: That’s also concerning and pretty bad as it reads, but any company basically has to abide the country’s laws, so if Interpol orders the Swiss police to fetch the data, no legally operating company can really do anything about it or they’re gone as well. A similar thing happened to Tutanota in Germany, iirc.
about #1: you see, your point is already defeated, because he called you a “defender saying actually”
ofc, you are right, and everyone saying that Proton ceo is pro maga from that one statement has reading comprehension problems
Defeated, no, but I definitely don’t give a shit about their opinion.
🤔 why is the privacy thing not the biggest threat? I would think that the privacy one would be more of a threat to privacy than the political stuff. Is that not the case?
I don’t know how you can, with a straight face, separate “political” and “privacy” stuff. They are intrinsically linked.
The amount of hoops needed to make the IP address thing, which is just IP address, happen…massive
Sure, I can imagine the political issues could lead to privacy issues. My question was not about whether or not that’s true[1]. I was simply wondering why a possible privacy issue would rank higher than the actual issue that has already happened.
Something more specific/objective might be helpful though. Saying he’s “pro maga” is like saying he’s “bad vibes”; it requires the reader to just take your word for it without knowing exactly why. But, again, my question was more about the ranking ↩︎
I just don’t think the IP address is a big deal. A category 5 probably outranks a definite tropical depression.
Imagine paying anything for proton services.
Proton lol. You’re such a joker
I don’t trust proton either
The company could flip any time but for now their products are pretty good as a google alternative. I use the calendar, mail, cloud, contacts and vpn app and have zero complaints. Plus they couldn’t access any of my data if they wanted to.
Do you want bitcoin? They offer that! Go get it, crypto bro.
Don’t tell me you shop at Aldi unless you have purchased ALL of their products!
Don’t you tell me how to shop the aisle of shame
I purchased a cart for only 25¢
they couldn’t access any of my data if they wanted to.
I am not so sure that’s true
The thing is, it’s not true about any E2E encryption where all parts of the codebase are controlled by the company.
It could be as simple as updating their website to send your password to them in plain text while logging in, now the encryption is useless as they would have your password.
Who do you trust?
riseup
i trust them more than google. they’ve been a little sketchy lately (bc of the ai stuff, not the ceos political stuff) but at least only one entity has my data this way. I’d rather self-host but i can’t rn.
they’ve been known to collaborate with governments and have been accused of forcing traffic through an Israeli contractor. i can’t trust them.
