• krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 minutes ago

      I want LLMs to be used to create thousands of characters that have agency in like, Skyrim or something, and to watch the absolutely unhinged fucking chaos of what it creates.

      I don’t want it to play games for me.

  • MoreZombies@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    How much legal trouble would I get for kicking a CEO in the testicles? it feels like it would be worth it if I ever met NVIDIA’s bosses.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Y’all laugh but there are way too many people into idle games, not to mention people who prefer watching a stream (even without commentary) over playing a game itself.

    I cannot comprehend why, though, just like I can’t comprehend how cheating (particularly single player) can be fun.

    • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      Cheats in single player games is a blast.

      It gets old quick but it’s fun for a while.

    • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Imagine thé thing you cook and guide a rimworld playing ia while making cookie then an horde attack you start yelling the cookie burn your base is lost.

    • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I don’t watch others playing games, either, but someone who likes those streams told me he didn’t see a difference between watching good gamers play games and good football players play football.

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You never used cheat codes in GTA San Andreas and the like? It’s a lot of fun

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I actually thought about that after my comment and summoning a tank from nowhere was fun. At least for a little bit… but maybe mostly for the novelty of it all. Also I was like, 12.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      how cheating (particularly single player) can be fun

      Have you never played a game with unreasonable grind that saps all the fun out of it ? Often just to drive player hours and ‘engagement’. Multiplayer cheats however can die in a fire.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I suppose. When I’m referring to cheats, it’s more in regards to invulnerability, infinite resources, etc., which seem to sap the point of having a game in the first place. Like making the fun parts into a grind, rather than the other way around.

        That said, I’ll also say sometimes part of the challenge is the grind, so it depends. You have to pick your own poison, right?

        Like, take Silksong for example. You lose out on the full experience if you mod out the annoying run from bench to boss, it’s like a 40 second annoyance built in punishment. But I get why you’d do that-- it’s technically there for a reason but I get it. Hell, even the difficulty adjustment mods I can understand.

        But making the bosses die in one hit or making yourself invulnerable? Now you’ve lost me, that’s like a core element of the game; you might as well just watch someone else play it because what’s the point.

        • OmgItBurns@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I mean it used to be the norm for games to have cheat codes built into them. Maybe you get stuck on one part and need help, maybe you have fun spawning a bunch of weapons and going on a rampage (see GTA), or maybe you just want to see what happens if you spawn a giant enemy in a small room.

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          When I was a child I used to ask my dad to input the invulnerability cheat in Doom. I was way too bad at movement, aiming and basically just everything, that I could have had fun otherwise. Likewise for Anno 1602, there I needed the money cheat because otherwise I’d just go bankrupt. I didn’t understand the income balance yet but I still had fun building economy chains.

          I’m not sure I have a point here. Just remembered cheating as a child because I needed it. Probably haven’t cheated in 18 years now.

          • taiyang@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            My dad entered in codes for me when I was really little, but that’s kind of another thing entirely. I don’t think little kids have an achievement oriented sorta version of play, so anything goes with them. Once you’re older, that dopamine rush just hits differently, though.

            In education you could also consider it a form of scaffolding. Enabling someone to do something they normally can’t do is a form of development, like giving handicaps in games and stuff can foster the skills to not need them eventually.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    10 hours ago

    That’s cool. AI can do art and writing and video games for me. It can watch all my shows. All I have to do is work and maybe sleep. Sounds fun.

    • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Honestly I’d be curious about what a couple Minecraft bots could do. If you gave them a roadmap to endgame gear, what kind of farms would they build?

      • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        If they’re as good at the game as LLMs are at writing, the bots would probably try to build a Nether portal using black wool instead of obsidian, then set it on fire, then die burning on said fire.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Work is hard, modern games are easy.

      Shoot this dot, go to that dot, bring “x” to this dot…

      Anything requiring critical thinking like a puzzle, the bot just brute forces trying every possible outcome until something works.

      It works because games have a finite set of options and at least one progresses. The real world isn’t that clean, and you don’t get infinite chances to get 1 correct solution.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Actually if they can use that to make good ai opponents for 4x games, it’d be pretty sweet

    • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Except you don’t need a neural net to do this, nor would you really want one for it because it would be incredibly slow unless you use the GPU to run it which might be a bit busy running the actual game. It’s like a “make game run worse” option.

      In game AI can be pretty sophisticated even without the addition of neural nets which could be OK with determining strategy based on player action, but really isn’t going to be good for the entire control.

      This kind of thing is only useful as tech demo for playing platformers and the like with the same inputs a human player would, basically more like a bot.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        In game AI can be pretty sophisticated even without the addition of neural nets which could be OK with determining strategy based on player action, but really isn’t going to be good for the entire control.

        Given that it has been the weak point in almost all 4x games in the past 30 years, I’d be happy if they give anything novel a try

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Next: game companies can subscribe to NVIDIA anti-AI-cheating AI. This is innovation under capitalism.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Great! Now the AI can play the video games for me while I do the dishes. I swear it was the other way around in the SciFi.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Shut up and get back down the mines or your robot manager-security-cop will have to terminate you. Meet your billionaire-enforced quota and you’ll live to enjoy another day of mining.

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Plot twist: turns out that at some point, the billionaire got replaced by robots who have learned to be megalomaniac assholes.

  • TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I guess Elon won’t be needing gamers’ services to max out his characters anymore.

    Fucking AI taking valuable jobs away again.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The age of ai-generated streamers is coming…

    People and corporations will automatize all the process and turn it into passive income, and a lot of people will somehow watch it, making the thing profitable.

    I’m tired of all this…