Low-quality AI-generated content is now saturating social media – and generating about $117m a year, data shows

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    Why it wouldn’t be? You ask AI, you generate with AI, you replace humans with AI an you also watch AI.\ Wait till they change news anchors with AI.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I use freetube to kinda help deal with it but it is still a real issue. Even something like internet browser comparison videos are filed with AI voice overs and no real human input.

    • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      For YouTube, I’ve switched to Grayjay and I just subscribe to creators I like. I ignore the home feed.

      This has removed AI slop, ads, and shorts, which is awesome, but I the tradeoff is jot having a useful recommendation feed. Its not as good as YouTube of old, but worlds better than YouTube of the last few years.

  • manualoverride@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve stopped watching YouTube shorts because of this, and the removal of the downvote count makes it harder to tell.

  • saltnotsugar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s probably going to get worse before it gets better. The YouTube algorithm favors low effort frequent posting, so AI slop is perfect for the platform.

    • GreenShimada@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Every algorithm is based around frequent posting and farming engagement. Everything is optimized to ruin the internet.

    • DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Wait that means YouTube might be dying? Im actually mildly happy with that, maybe it ruins their Monopoly and opens the web for smaller niche platforms (not sure how they would survive AI but if they don’t reward low effort high freq it might be something?)

      • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        12 hours ago

        For it to die there has to be an alternative for the content. I don’t see anything that could replace it at the moment.

          • blaue_Fledermaus@olio.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Peertube still needs improvements to start looking attractive.

            While it is technically federated, using it still feels like it’s just a bunch of small disjointed sites.

            • pentastarm@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 hours ago

              That’s fair. I just hope mentioning and drawing more people to the platform helps (or provides incentive) for it to improve.and become a viable YouTube replacement. Or at least a supplement to something better than YouTube.

        • Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Rumble is getting there. If it can drop all the right wing bs it would be a decent platform. The gaming section is decent though

    • Pringles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 hours ago

      2 years ago I went to youtube without logging into my account. The amount of right wing manosphere crap being recommended to new accounts was frightening. Within 5 minutes there was a video playing of how women should be subservient to men because their role is basically a house cleaning baby factory with no free will.

      I genuinely think google should be sued the everliving shit out of them for allowing this crap to be pushed. They looked at what facebook did and went “Oh, that’s great. Let’s do that as well!”

      • Medic8teMe@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I just went there after years of avoidance because my kids are there are lot. I needed to see. They’re not there anymore. Manosphere, I hate those different than me, racism, outright hatred. It’s fucked.

        • Telex@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I don’t regularly use it, but I run into yt in search results every now and then. If I’ve looked, the front page and lots of recommends have always looked like cancer, I’ve never seen anything like that. Could it be a localized thing?

  • itsathursday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “Generating” $117m, or allocating ad revenue and watch hours to these videos? Because it sounds like businesses will pay for advertisements to see numbers go up, and if numbers go up then people think ads are working. This whole economy is stupid because unless the money is coming from a consumer then it’s false. If the only thing being consumed is content, the ads are simply a hurdle that people love to keep throwing in the way and propping up this shit content. At some point market economics needs to win and balance things out and advertisers need to check their ROI, but that will never happen because new metrics will be made to justify the marketing teams or 3rd party consultants these companies are paying to put out these ads.

    If there was a filter for “unmonetised” this house of cards would fall on its ass. Real people uploading real content to share for real consumers to enjoy and view.