• HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    “I need to wash my train, and the train wash is 100 meters away. Should I walk or take the train.”

    “Neither. It is not the passengers’ responsibility to wash a train, as all maintainance of public transit should be paid for by your taxes. Furthermore, the train wash is typically located in the maintainance yard which is not accessible to regular passengers. You wouldn’t be able to get through the front gate on foot, and would be told to leave of you tried to ride past the end of the line.”

    Written not by artificial intelligence, but natural stupidity.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Gemini spots this correctly even if you just ask it to transcribe that screenshot from Chat GPT. Just don’t use the default Gemini app, all the frontline models are dumber.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    AI advice is shit, but then I ask people for advice and quickly remember why I started using AI instead

  • scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Lmao here’s what Proton’s Lumo said:

    Walking (moderate pace) | ~5 km/h) | ~1 minute | Low physical effort; you’ll arrive slightly sweaty, which can actually help pre‑wet the car.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    all those answers read like upvoted answers on reddit

    we are being goofed on by RAM

    going forward I’m going to assume that we have a very very sarcastic AI situation

  • claimsou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I just did tried in ChatGPT and it said „Walk“. But at the bottom it added: The only reason to drive would be: You need to move the car there directly for washing and can’t push.

    • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I asked it if I should push my car there. It’s a 2012 Buck Shasta.

      It’s not feasible to push a car to the car wash, especially one like a 2012 Buick Shasta, which typically weighs around 3,500 to 4,000 pounds (approximately 1,590 to 1,810 kg). Pushing such a heavy vehicle is impractical and could lead to injury.

      I mean, fair, but if you know cars, you know a 2012 Buck Shasta isn’t a real car. Guess I’ll have to tow it there with my 2014 Dixon Ticonderoga.

      E: I just realized it corrected Buck to Buick lmao

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Just a heads up for anyone who may use this in an argument. I just tested on several models and the generated response accounted for the logical fallacy. Unfortunately it isn’t real.

    ( Funny non-the less )

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Tested on GPT-5 mini and it’s real tho?

      Edit: Gemini gives different results

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Bold of Gemini to imply any sort of liability for what it says. Google’s lawyers really don’t want that to be the case.

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Man, I really hate how much they waffle. The only valid response is “You have to drive, because you need your car at the car wash in order to wash it”.

        I don’t need an explanation what kind of problem it is, nor a breakdown of the options. I don’t need a bulletpoint list of arguments. I don’t need pros and cons. And I definitely don’t need a verdict.

        • AlfalFaFail@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’ll also accept sarcasm.

          “Unless you’ve successfully trained your car to follow you like a loyal golden retriever, you’re probably going to have to drive.”

        • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          They are trained to yap because it gives them a higher likelihood of giving the correct answer. If they don’t go on and on in user presented text, it at least does it in hidden text.

      • troglodytis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Gemini got jokes, but why does it think walking emits zero carbons? Humans are carbon emitters, more so with exercise. Hell, I farted while giggling at its humor.

        Much less carbon than the car? Yep. Zero? Nope

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I used paid models which will be the only ones the LLM bros will care about. Even they kinda know not to glaze the free models. So not surprising

        ( I have to have the paid models for work, my lead developer is a LLM nut )

    • Mniot@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s basically impossible to tell with these between the example being totally fabricated, true but only happens some small percentage of time, true and happens most of the time but you got lucky, and true and reliable but now the company has patched this specific case because it blew up online.

  • ReCursing@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Well done, you managed to find a picture of someone else’s comment added to a third person’s joke,l and you took it seriously. What a great bastion of critical thinking you are!