I want Type B, but with male nipples.
We maybe also should have body type C, D, E, F, G, H, etc.
If femality is stored in the nipples, where are the nipples stored. Maybe the balls I hypothesize.
mature modern games are unapologetic and give you a genital selection too
the question is, are you a penis a or penis b type???
And despite all of that maturity, they still do male-gaze, heteronormative centric design.
In BG3, Type A halflings (male presenting) are all dumpy and kinda goofy-looking. Type B halflings are all banging smokeshows. Give me the dumpy looking halflings, man.
In Cyberpunk, the camera lingers on nude women, but hides or ignores male nudity, even if the player character is fem presenting and chooses a male partner.
There’s a YouTube video about this, but I can’t find it. I’ll update later if I do (and remember)
eh, sounds like an accidental noting burger.
these games are taking inclusion steps. but that doesn’t mean they need to stop catering for the majority. its still art made by humans and their own preferences find a way in
Lmao reminds me the stat where Larian said that the absolute majority played HUMAN WARRIOR :D
You sound like a man.
ok
Bulverism
but that doesn’t mean they need to stop catering for the majority.
Yeah, it’s the immediate assumption that the male gaze is the majority.
Women make up half of the gaming community.
In most studies most women and most men prefer looking at female nudity.
The “male gaze” is objectively just an unfortunate condition of how we’re wired. We all like looking at conventionally attractive women. Even straight women. So that will always be the default in any game with artists selected at random from the general artistic population.
Let’s face it, women are straight up beautiful. Like, outside of a sexual or “treating like an object” point of view, they do hold inherent beauty that men only seem to compare in Greek statues.
Men are also beautiful and there’s a lot of male Greek statues.
Wheres my cybernetic lady horse cock? Immersion ruined.
check your mouth. that’s where i keep mine.
I get the modded mega dong.
tbh baldurs gate and cyberpunk really lacked a proper donger slider
would even be lore accurate with cybernetic dick enhancements in cyberpunk and magic in dnd
just gotta wait till they do a FATAL CRPG…
yeah and why can’t we buy exploding dick enhancements (or dick cannons) like that one dude we gotta give a ride to
Sorry. That’s on me.
I was the one responsible for implementing the donger slider in Cyberpunk but I kept getting distracted with all the donger slider field research.
Honestly a real-life donger slider is worth the investment.
True. I invested in my left hand early on and it has really paid off.
Donger slider field research, you say?
I feel like there are cybernetic dick enhancements in cyberpunk but they’re not widespread or used a lot. Like they usually are peddled by sketchy folks and don’t seem to be something advertised that much.
I mean, good chance I’m wrong on that but that was kind of the vibe I got playing the game.
Dong slider is a hilarious thought. I don’t know enough about coding and game development but it feels like it might be hard to get the animations right if you had a slider vs selection because you’d have to be figuring out animations for those titties or cock on the fly.
But maybe that’s just me showing my lack of knowledge, perhaps a slider from tiny titties to big ol tatas is already a thing in some games. I guess it’s also dependent on the game engine.
There are ads in game and a quest dedicated to the Mr Studd penis implant so it’d be canon too
Cyberpunk had some great mods, though. It’s just too bad they didn’t show up in the sex scenes.
You need to reevaluate where you get your mods. There’s plenty of mods specifically changing the sex scenes, expanding them, and allowing ridiculous things to happen within them.
Fantasy games should have that one extra ring slot.
underrated comment
I mean there’s that one guy who said it felt like his dick was stuck in a goddamn pencil sharpener
Yeah, but his implant was broken.
never buy a used mr studd
I pick the micropenis because I’m short and proud of it.
flaming crotch man cool
no character creator has yet to top saints row 2. they just have a “body” slider on top of all the normal “slim/fat”, “short/tall”, “lanky/muscular” stuff that morphs where the body fat goes. if the booblies get too big your character gets a bra.
Man, I’d PAY for a modern remake of SR2 that kept it basically as is but added better gfx/QoL stuff. That game was the peak of the series imo
You say peak of the series but it still lacks the massive purple dildo from later games
Ha! That’s awesome I love it
Give the Type-A a chest binder. Now everyone is covered.
I feellike I’ve seen this in some game. Not a binder, but that both types have covered tops and bottoms.
Monster hunter does that
As I recall, Fallout does this with the tanktop/shorts combo.
I feellike I’ve seen this in some game. Not a binder, but that both types have covered tops and bottoms.
Baldur’s Gate maybe?
Baldurs Gate has covered nothing
Ah you’re right. I was thinking more along the lines of which character creation doesn’t put any limits depending on gender.
Feel like I’d also have a problem if I tried to go in public without a top due to having boobs (HRT <3) and I think most people would agree I’m not female.
There was a protest in front of the Scottish supreme court when the UK had a ruling that declared trans women were men because of their “biological sex”. So a bunch of trans women stood with their tits out and arms painted red since apparently they’re men and that’s OK
Ironically almost all media coverage of the event censored their breasts
Everyone should be able to go topless if they wish. Boobs are not inherently sexual.
We need to flip the script and make men’s nipples inherently sexual. They don’t even dispense milk (this is a lie but most people don’t know that) they’re just an erogenous zone.
While I agree, there is a connotation in many western countries to consider. Were women to be topless, they would be perceived as a thrill seeker, mentally ill, hippy, or something else in that vein because of religious customs dictating that arousal of your self, or even others is sinful. Changing perceptions would be a generational effort and, at least in the US, things are swinging more conservative rather than less.
But, in some parts of Europe, toplessness is accepted on both sides of the aisle, so the world isn’t wholly broken. Asia has smatterings of the same. I support egalitarianism in all things, and it’s deeply frustrating that the human body is, mostly, stigmatized through crystalized, cancerous religious repression
Were women to be topless, they would be perceived as a thrill seeker, mentally ill, hippy, or something else in that vein because of religious customs dictating that arousal of your self, or even others is sinful.
This is more of an argument to go topless than anything else.
FREE THE TITTIES!
In abstract? Absolutely. All I’m going to say to this is to choose where you expend the effort wisely and spread the idea safely.
The only states in the US that have statewide bans on female toplessness is Indiana, Tennessee, and Utah. The majority of states in the US explicitly allow femme people to go topless because masculine people are allowed to go topless.
How about we stop warning women about existing as women and push against people who would perceive women as “a thrill seeker, mentally ill, hippy, or something else in that vein” for judging them.
I recommend heading to Utah to spread your ideas. Half of the US lives in deep, dangerous repression. Direct your misplaced aggression at them, not me
What? I live in the US. I’m speaking from my lived experience here. I agreed that Utah is one of the states that outlaws it.
I can’t have a conversation with you without being accused of being aggressive?
deleted by creator
Only when society ascribes sexuality to things that are inherently not sexual.
Boobs are not inherently sexual.
deleted by creator
Being topless is not sexual violence.
thrill seeker, mentally ill, hippy, or something else
You call men like that “perverts” or “sex pests”. Women can be those things too.
While you are correct that the US is more conservative, we do have nude beaches.
I think men should cover their chests too.
I’d rather give people the choice than to police their bodies.
I agree with the first. I think evolution would disagree with the second. The main purpose for partial display (aka cleavage) is enticement for attracting potential mates.
The same works with some nice hairy man pecs cleavage, what’s your point?
The main purpose of mammary glands is feeding offspring.
Boobs can be sexual, but they are not inherently so.
I dived in a bit, and I will concede that sexual use is not the main reason, since they evolved from primates and previous species in order to produce milk. But all other species don’t have them constantly enlarged. Studies show that there are many factors at play, such as providing more area of touch for the human infant and perhaps a more constant source of food since human infants take longer to mature. But they did develop the use for sexual signalling too when we became upright, if for nothing else than for showing sexual maturity. The human brain has probably evolved along with those changes to select which characteristics evolved more pronounced.
So they have multiple uses. The very fact that they are a subconscious trigger for the male has to mean something.
So they have multiple uses. The very fact that they are a subconscious trigger for the male has to mean something.
Yep, they can be sexual but are not inherently sexual.
It’s not just men that are turned on by boobs.
You’re absolutely right. For good reason, they’re wonderful.
Funnily enough, you can’t take the top off either in osrs
People who get vexed over gender in character creation are the same people bound to get really upset when watching a movie trailer.
deleted by creator
