• Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What is pre-production? Did they already buy the snacks? Are they just thinking about starting?

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Basically they’ve written the design document for the next game, which is why they can reveal the engine because that’s been decided on. It doesn’t mean they know the story yet, but they likely have a good general idea, because that would inform the design document.

      For example if the game needed jetpacks, but that wasn’t an existing engine feature, then they have a plan for jetpacks. And if you NEED jetpacks, you probably know roughly where they’re going to be used, so you have some gameplay/story ideas mapped out.

      But also a design plan and a finished product are very different things. You might plan for one thing, but create something very different.

      So the game is probably still 4-5 years away.

  • ms.lane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hooray!

    but creation

    I’m ecstatic, other engines just aren’t moddable like creation, this is GREAT news.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      It’s a very very old engine though. As funny as it is to put a pot on someone’s head I really hope the AI have a bit more brains in this one. It would also be nice if they could stall the interior of buildings inside the exterior so I don’t have to look at a loading screen whenever I open a door.

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    2 days ago

    So if this releases after TES 6 I guess I’ll play it with my friends in assisted living?

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 days ago

    They took so long to start that all the hype is gone. I’ve got anti-hype, I fully expect to be disappointed. It’s going to suck.

    • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I thought fallout 4 was pretty mid, which killed any hype I might’ve had for 5. Did not like having a backstory forced on my character.

    • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Pretty sure the only reason they’re doing it is as a token move for some court order or something. I’m really not interested either. No hype for me thanks. I’d rather have an actual game then the nebulous promise of a game that’s going to be disappointing.

      Starfield was their last shot for me. They fumbled that.

    • aburrito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Genuinely, like, I know where the money went obviously, but what about the shear amount of time they’ve had to make anything, like what the hell was actually happening in that studio honestly

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Endless arguments about a new engine vs even more duct tape on the creation engine. Starfield was a tech demo of their latest updates.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just wait until the official reveal and you’ll be back onboard that hype train in seconds.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    “And the elder scrolls VI is built on the elder scrolls IV engine”

    (Probably) Lol

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        You say that as if Unreal Engine gets a ground-up rewrite for every single version.

        Code gets upgraded and adapted over time. And the Creation Engine is no different.

        • Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Yes and no. Bugs can be enshrined into core architecture where fixing bugs causes breaking changes.

          Fundamental changes will have wide sweeping effects. Old code can be difficult to manage changes in, “why is this the way it is? Is it integral? A hack?” Each change is now slower, harder, and requires careful planning

          Clearly their game engine is showing its age and needs some redesign. They are reaching the limits of what they can do within the current architecture.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Clearly their game engine is showing its age and needs some redesign.

            Go play Starfield. The story may be bland, but they’ve crammed tons of updated tech in it, and it lived up to the claims of being the least buggy Besthesda release ever

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Goddamn everyone here is so dismissive or apathetic, it’s a little disappointing and sad to see.

    I’m not 100% gung-ho about this or anything, but I’m pleasantly unsurprised and I’m gonna start building up a tiny bit of excitement for it.

    Like why can’t we just be kind of happy or excited that we’re gonna get more of what we like? Does everything really have to have some kind of negative connotation these days?

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Starfield kinda killed positive views of Bethesda. Fallout 76 shortly before that essentially eliminating most of the good will they had.

      Beyond the technical failures inherent to those titles, even more so than the average Bethesda title, the writing, the story, the atmospheric story telling were all just… bad. Not a single glimmer of what made Skyrim or their previous titles great could really be found. Fallout 76 felt like the most obvious and pathetic cash grab in game release history, being practically unplayable for the first six months of its life… which for an online game is ridiculous; and Starfield legitimately felt like what a dev team that were fans of Skyrim might produce. It felt like a third-party rip off of Bethesda’s style.

      Don’t get me wrong both games have their fans, and honestly the hate is overrated as both games are competent, they’re just not good. They’re just not Bethesda games.

      Add onto that the fact it’s been 15 years since a significant elder scrolls title was released; because let’s face it no one remembers Blades, ESO is its own thing entirely, and I had to actually google ‘elder scrolls card game’ to remember wtf Legends was called; and you have a recipe for absolute disappointment. Most of the people that worked on Oblivion and Skyrim are gone from the company. The new batch have not made a popular game in that time besides Fallout 4, which is still viewed by half the fallout fan base as the worst fallout game despite Fallout Tactics existing.

      The negative outlook is because we aren’t likely to get more of what we like. Especially given Todd Howard’s obsession with using AI. This is much more likely to be a corpse wearing the skin of a beloved franchise than anything worth playing, all for the low-low price of $80+ USD, if not $100+ USD.

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      For me it’s that I’ve played loads of games that use Bethesda’s tooling and it just ends up feeling pokey and samey to me. They’re hamstrung by their technical choices and after all these years I just don’t have it in me to get excited about their latest stab at making their wheezing toolchain cough out another needlessly sparse experience.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    For once I’m glad a game will be using Creation Engine. That’s how low Unreal has fallen.

  • jontree255@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean this should surprise no one after how well the TV show did. Probably not coming till like 2036 and two more rounds of mass layoffs from Xbox.

    • MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      2036 and two more rounds of mass layoffs from Xbox.

      Optimistic to assume only 2 more rounds of layoffs in the next decade, as opposed to next year or two.

      • jontree255@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Well the second half of the Xbox layoffs that just happened are still coming. Not sure if we’re counting those as one or two separate ones.

        Shits fucked

  • Flamekebab@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m out of the loop - is that just another iteration of the engine Bethesda has been using forever or did someone finally punch whoever keeps making that call in the right body part to make it stop?

    • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      That jank engine is what makes the bethesda games modding community work.

      If they give it up theyre throwing away a huge advantage, and we will get worse mods.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I keep seeing this sentiment in this thread, like Unreal isn’t just as easily modified. Doesn’t even need a specialized toolset; you just use the engine tools that are freely available. Same with Unity. Or any other freely available engine.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I really don’t want to have to spend time figuring out which additional things I need to install to make their games good. I’d rather they were good out of the box.

          • Flamekebab@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Perhaps Bethesda should. Might do them some good to know how far behind their tech is compared to their competitors.

            I’m surprised that “I’d like games to not need mods to be good” is somehow controversial.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      First off, you clearly haven’t played a Bethesda game since Skyrim. Bethesda has actually been making a ton of improvements to the engine over the years.

      Second, rethink what you said. Do you really think every other engine isn’t continually updating the same engine over the past several decades?

      Unreal Engine 6 is about to release. Do you seriously think that Epic is completely rewriting the engine from scratch for each version?

      Do you really think that Unity is getting a ground-up rewrite every few years? Or GameMaker? Or Godot?

      No developer is going to throw away a giant body of software and start over from scratch if they can help it. It’s absolutely insane. You take what you have, and upgrade it and adapt it for what you need.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago
        1. Your assumption is completely incorrect.

        2. It isn’t that the engine is an iteration, it’s that it’s an iteration of an engine that is legendarily janky.

        Now, when I say “engine” I’m using it as short-hand for “the way Bethesda uses the engine, its associated tooling, and media”. I’m aware that the GameBryo engine (or whatever they’re calling its latest descendant) can be used to make stuff that’s decent, but the open world RPGs that Bethesda uses it for are a terrible fit for it.

        Their games succeed despite the engine, not because of it, and I’d love to see them build on something that I don’t pick up and immediately go “Yep, it’s another game using their technology, guess we’re in for a tiny map and a handful of NPCs”.

        I am not expecting a developer to start over from scratch. I’m hoping that a company as wealthy and successful as Bethesda might consider using a different engine that actually allows for the kinds of worlds their devs clearly want to create. It’s obviously not going to happen, as why bother when people will buy their games regardless, but what can I say, I’m a cynical optimist.

        1. Could my notifications on here, for once, not light up with someone picking a fucking fight with me over dumb bullshit? I obviously didn’t mean “write something from scratch” and that’s the thing you fixated on for some baffling reason. Bethesda games are known for their jank due to the tech they choose to use. That isn’t news and it isn’t controversial. Right, I’m going back to bed.
        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago
          1. Your assumption is completely incorrect.

          it’s that it’s an iteration of an engine that is legendarily janky.

          Pick 1, not both. Fallout 4 was stable. Starfield actually did have fairly few bugs, about on par with most AAA games on release. They’ve gotten a lot better over the years. Again, if you’d actually played any of their games since Skyrim you’d have seen that.

          the GameBryo engine (or whatever they’re calling its latest descendant) can be used to make stuff that’s decent, but the open world RPGs that Bethesda uses it for are a terrible fit for it.

          You have absolutely no fucking clue what you’re talking about. At all.

          Could my notifications on here, for once, not light up with someone picking a fucking fight with me over dumb bullshit?

          Then don’t say dumb bullshit that isn’t even consistent.

          • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Fallout 4 was stable

            lmao

            It wasn’t stable at launch (having god rays enabled literally caused the game to crash simply looking toward Trinity Tower from anywhere on the god damn map), and still isn’t that stable now even after all the fixes both official and unofficial.

          • Flamekebab@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Then don’t say dumb bullshit that isn’t even consistent.

            Take your own advice and get the fuck out of my mentions.

  • buran@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is Fallout 5 the same game or a different game to the one allegedly being developed by Obsidian?

    • master94ga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Different games, Fallout 5 is developed by Bethesda after TES 6, Obsidian is working on another new Fallout

    • lath@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Assuming this was decided after microslop decided to mass produce the Fallout IP faster and faster, I’d say they’re different games.

    • buran@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mmm… I hoped the IP was transferred from one studio to another. Seems more like a borrowing.

      Don’t know what Xbox would do if Obsidian ends making a better game and the Bethesda game is overshadowed by it.

        • buran@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, the difference being Fallout 3 was well received and the studio had some pedigree. While Fallout 76 and Starfield were actively disliked.

          • BlueOysterCultist@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’m not sure what happened with 76 since I lost interest upon finding out it was multiplayer, but it’s really well received now when looking at Steam reviews

            • buran@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, the game is in a better place now. The problem being they shouldn’t have released as it was.

            • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              It got a lot better. Then they changed the seasons and it started getting worse. Around the time they added becoming a ghoul for player characters it was more or less necessary to have their subscription service if you didn’t want to deal with a lot of arbitrary bullshit that was designed to force you to buy the subscription. You basically couldn’t get all the season rewards without it. All that aside it was surprisingly fun and adds a lot of good lore. You can play it more or less like a single player game and when I still played old timer high level characters would often drop gear and resources for new players, it was the most genuinely pleasant online community I’ve ever experienced.

            • shani66@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              The steam reviews aren’t accurate. The review timeline of steam shows suspiciously low negative reviews during release, a disastrous release with game breaking bugs and a strong backlash against the horrible monetization systems, to say nothing of the shitstorm that bethesda caused outside of the game itself. Iirc that was also a point in time that steam made a big deal out of hiding negative reviews for corpos under the guise of fighting review bombing.

              Also it’s still at 50 on metacritic.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Microsoft basically took it from Bethesda and cleared out a bunch of their core staff

        The IP might not have been transferred, but Bethesda’s product ownership has been revoked. They didn’t even let outside teams touch their offshoot projects (like apps), and now the IP is probably going to be milked

        Maybe obsidian will do something interesting with it before it inevitably is reduced to slop

  • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Given the downward trend from 3 -> 4 (and from 2 -> 3 from what I hear) this is a game that will really need to impress before I consider picking it up.

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’d argue 4 is actually better than 3, just not in any way that actually makes it worth playing. 4 is a mediocre S.T.A.L.K.E.R. like, 3 is hot garbage.

      • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Maybe it’s because 3 was the first one I played, but 4 seemed much more shallow.

        Worse mini games and you show up on an organisations doorstep and 10 mins later you’re running the place.

        • shani66@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          the writing isn’t that much better in 3, the gameplay loop in 4 is vastly improved over 3, however.

      • AmbientChaos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        3 and New Vegas are great games. 4 was okay, they just sold a lot of the soul in exchange for mass appeal, just like Skyrim did compared to Oblivion and Morrowind