• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    36 minutes ago

    fake. pipewire is actually awesome.

    that nagging sleep issue though? yeah…

  • RustyNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Funny thing, but it’s windows I got problem sound problems with. Randomly decide to ignore mic, speakers doesn’t get out of “phone call quality mod”. Every time I need to disconnect then reconnect just for my colleagues to hear me out.

    Linux? No problem. Easy effects run perfectly too (except when low CPU availability… But everything at that point gets problems)

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Real talk, though: why has Linux taken at least five tries (OSS, ALSA, JACK, PulseAudio, PipeWire) to get audio right?!

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      5 hours ago

      OSS came first, then got replaced by ALSA after it became proprietary.

      PulseAudio is a userspace audio server to which programs connect. It manages audio settings per app, then sends everything to ALSA. JACK is the same but with a focus on low latency.

      PipeWire is a modern drop-in replacement for both, and also has support for video on Wayland.

      • heliotrope@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And then there’s also sndio, ported from OpenBSD. This does basically the same thing as OSS/ALSA.

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        That’s not a feature thats exclusive to open source though. Circular reasoning like this just distracts from the fact that software just like hardware is constantly evolving, even in personal spaces. Thinking someone can do better has no relevance on the “open source” aspect or the political leaning.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Pipewire is newer and emulates PulseAudio so that it can be used as a drop-in replacement. There’s literally a command called pipewire-pulse related to this.

      It makes me wonder if they really have both installed or are mistaking Pipewire’s emulation for an active PulseAudio installation, and so it’s just Pipewire that’s acting up.

      I’d say reboot, but being in space might be one of those times where that’s a non-starter. In which case, they’re going to have to get their hands dirty unpicking system hooks and trying to reattach them all again as and when Pipewire’s working again, assuming it doesn’t do that automatically.

      I never had a problem with either Pipewire or real PulseAudio back when that was current. I had motherboard sound physically pop, requiring the purchase of a separate sound card, but never a driver issue, so I can’t even imagine what might be going on.

  • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Systemd just keeps asking me for govt id, I didn’t bring it with me to space

    Thanks Dylan

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What the hell linux distros are so far back in time that they have audio issues? I haven’t had to do anything in maybe the past decade and even when distro hopping it always worked?

    Or is it super niche hardware? I haven’t heard of any real people using anything other than mobo built in audio since like 2007.

    • csh83669@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      I just installed Pop!_OS this week and have this problem constantly. The point I had to write a service to watch for all my audio devices to vanish and restart the others.

    • rapchee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “lol it’s just satire” meanwhile people are thinking audio, gaming, whatever is an issue on linux
      as a few year old linux convert, getting used to it is the biggest hurdle

    • zelahdieliekeis@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think the answer is that slop tends to make everything look well lit and soft like a portrait. So by association, portraits now look like slop.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Yeah I guess that is actually what is happening… combined with… 99% of pictures people see these days are taken with phones or webcams, with different methods of doing color balancing, and different standards for lighting and color grading.

        Whereas it used to be, in the before days, in the last century… you’d probably most often see a person pictured in either a school photo, a mugshot, a portrait done for some other occasion, or basically a polaroid, which would be recognizabley differently exposed/styled (basically) from the rest.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      wdym?

      Astronauts are following the same photo format as they’ve always done, and the penguin is wearing a tuxedo.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Huh.

          To me it looks like an actually very well colorbalanced photo… maybe something to do with image formats, different kinds of viewing devices, some kind of HDR process working oddly?

          EDIT:

          Also, the background, the backdrop, its … the actual pattern of the material is that its lighter and more colorful in the center, and then does a kind of noisy circular taper to black, toward the edges.

          Thats not an exposure or contrast error, its an intentional choice, meant to emphasis the center of the image, but also allow the well lit people on the edges to be clearly discernable, in detail.

          Its a fairly common practice in more traditional portrait photography.