• neatchee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Congratulations on being someone who chose to watch the world burn instead of trying to stop it in whatever small ways were possible.

    Your moral superiority must feel great from the safety of your keyboard.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Congratulations on being a right wing dickwad happy to see a little genocide as long as you weren’t affected at home.

      • drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        No president other than trump would’ve been stupid enought to start this fight. Proven by 2 decades of NOT AT WAR WITH IRAN. Get off your high horse, you aren’t a martyr for anyone. People die everyday and all we really can control is that which happens AT HOME.

      • PugJesus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 hours ago

        “I want fewer genocides, not more genocides” is not “I’m fine with a little genocide.”

  • hesh@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Kamala would have continued suport for Israel, including arming and funding them, just like Biden. But starting literal war with Iran? Bombing school girls? I kinda doubt it. Biden didn’t.

    • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      What about firing all the senior generals and burning 14 years of missiles in 1 month or turning Hurmuz into a reparations toll booth?

      IMO the lefty “own the libs” mentality is indistinguishable from maga’s brain rot. Like congrats your mom smoked weed instead of taking you to church I guess.

      America is cooked because the people most dialed into what’s going on all have goldfish brains apparently.

      • mrdown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        Removing seniors generals make the chance of the usa winning the war lower. Israel will always get prioritized so the same amount of interceptors would have been used. The west should finally pay the price of hurting Iranians wirh sanctions by paying fortheir ships to pass from the straight

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Like congrats your mom smoked weed instead of taking you to church I guess

        Bold of you to assume I’m a leftist because my mom told me to be one and not from all the bigoted shit I saw at church.

        • CPMSP@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My thought exactly. Nothing dissuades people from being xtian than being around other xtians long enough.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      This is correct, mostly because apparently they already knew Strait of Hormuz was an issue. War is off the table if it hurts economically.

      But bombing school girls? I could see it not stopping them. They just wouldn’t be as inept to waste missiles on it; it wouldn’t stop them if there was a strategic reason. They’re not much better than Israel, if our actions in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria are any indication.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/07/14/the-jerusalem-u-s-israel-strategic-partnership-joint-declaration/ (because the WH direct link memory holed’ it)

      The United States stresses that integral to this pledge is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome. The United States further affirms the commitment to work together with other partners to confront Iran’s aggression and destabilizing activities, whether advanced directly or through proxies and terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

      Its the same doctrine that the Trump whitehouse is following. Biden supported the genocide of Palestine, under this doctrine. Do you think Kamala would have been to stop the 12 day war? Or would have even been interested in stopping it?

      I don’t. At least not with the level of support to Israel you describe, a level of support almost certainly she would have maintained or at least increased. It would have been more polite. Probably more competent. Maybe they would have built a coalition first. Maybe they spend 6 months sane-washing it so that BlueMAGA supports it.

      But this is what Israel wanted. And the Biden Whitehouse and the Harris candidacy ran on a policy of giving Israel everything they wanted.

      • hesh@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Eh. For decades US Presidents have given full-throated support to Israel. For decades they have hugged Israel’s PM and invited them to Congress. For decades Israel has asked US Presidents to bomb Iran to dust. And for decades US Presidents said no. Until Trump.

        • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I think a big part of “why now” is that the decades of propaganda painting Israel as the “good guys” of the region have really frayed. I believe that this was basically the last-ditch effort by Israel to meet it’s most desired strategic objectives before it loses its remaining political cover. There may have been more pushback from a less incompetent military under Harris, but I’m not at all confident that she wouldn’t have been sold on it anyway.

                • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  So you’ve moved on from bullying cross-dressers to bullying… people who ask why we’re bullying cross-dressers?

                  Really selling me and everyone else on how totally justified you were in your bullying.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I mean if they, did, I’m sure you’ll see the point in advocating full-throatedly to their demands, since you couldn’t stop fascism without them.

              • PugJesus@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                That’s only a valid argument if you assume more votes would be gained from acceding to their demands than not. Otherwise you still end up with a loss, only now you’re looking at the fucking Zionist ‘moderates’ being the missing piece that we have to accede ‘full-throatedly’ to, since we can’t ‘stop fascism’ without them.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Yeah this was the hand-wringing the trope they rolled out during the elections. Considering that the majority of Zionists are republicans already, at least in the form of Cristian zionists, we (both now and should have then) can readily dismiss this. It gets the Democratic candidate bupkis.

          • hesh@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 hours ago

            i didn’t say anything about Gaza. We’re talking about Iran

        • Hamartia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          It’s fair to say that Israel has wanted to push out or kill all the Palestinians for decades, yet no POTUS before Biden gave them carte blanche to do so. Going on that standard there’s no telling what Biden’s actual red lines were. Especially since reducing Iran to reinforce the stranglehold of the global north’s oligarchs has long been a goal of the Pentagon too.

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        But you see, it’s different because the US is only supplying the orphan crushing machine, keeping it running, and making more. It’s okay as long as we aren’t actually throwing the orphans in ourselves!

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Same reason they’re doing it now, to stem the flow of arms into Israel and make everyone enabling America and its attack dog choose between enabling us and having oil.

          • PugJesus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Same reason they’re doing it now, to stem the flow of arms into Israel

            Jesus fucking Christ, you can’t be serious.

            and make everyone enabling America and its attack dog choose between enabling us and having oil.

            So why didn’t they do this the last dozen times they were attacked by Israel?

              • PugJesus@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Because those were much more limited strikes.

                They eradicated most of Iran’s air defenses, which is kind of pertinent to the situation they find themselves in now.

                Why exactly do you think Iran closed the strait?

                … because the US joined an all-out fucking war on Iran, and increased oil prices weaken the domestic position of the American president to maintain the war.

      • PugJesus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Then Iran and Israel trade shots a few times, like happened the past dozen fucking times Israel attacked vital Iranian infrastructure.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I don’t think we are dealing with the same Israel we were before October 7th.

          And I don’t think Harris has some secret way to handle Bibi that neither Joe nor Donald have.

          Bibi would have dragged her along just like he has the other two.

          • PugJesus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I don’t think we are dealing with the same Israel we were before October 7th.

            I think we’re dealing with the exact same Israel we were before October 7th.

            And I don’t think Harris has some secret way to handle Bibi that neither Joe nor Donald have.

            No, but only Trump has been shitwitted enough to crater his own domestic approval rating and long-term US interests for Israeli asspats on his diaper.

            Bibi would have dragged her along just like he has the other two.

            Except Bibi’s strikes on Iran literally were not accompanied by American intervention in Iran during the October 2024 Israeli attacks on Iranian soil.

            So clearly there is a difference between now and then.

            • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Oooookay, we are totally dealing with pre-October 7th Israel. The one that knowingly attacked a US ship in 1967: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident

              At the time of the attack, the USS Liberty was flying the American flag and its identification was clearly indicated in large white letters and numerals on its hull. … Experience demonstrates that both the flag and the identification number of the vessel were readily visible from the air … Accordingly, there is every reason to believe that the USS Liberty was identified, or at least her nationality determined, by Israeli aircraft approximately one hour before the attack. … The subsequent attack by the torpedo boats, substantially after the vessel was or should have been identified by Israeli military forces, manifests the same reckless disregard for human life.[55][56]

              The US had to cover up the attack and still supports Israel to the hilt.

              “It was significant that, in contrast to his secretary of state, President Johnson fully accepted the Israeli version of the tragic incident.” He notes that Johnson himself included only one small paragraph about the Liberty in his autobiography,[57] in which he accepted the Israeli explanation, minimized the affair and distorted the number of dead and wounded, by lowering them from 34 to 10 and 171 to 100, respectively. Lenczowski further states: “It seems Johnson was more interested in avoiding a possible confrontation with the Soviet Union, … than in restraining Israel.”

              • PugJesus@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Yeah. It’s horrific. And the reluctance to confront Israel only gotten worse since then. Especially since AIPAC gaining a death grip on domestic US politics in the 1980s (it had been around since the 50s, but didn’t control discourse on Israel quite so totally), and then intensifying again with the heightened Islamophobia and evangelical millenarianism of the “War on Terror” in the 2000s.

      • PugJesus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Both the Soviets and the Canadians said that Nazi Germany was their main enemy during WW2, but that doesn’t mean the Soviets and Canadians were equivalent to each other.

        If you, a campist, and a theocrat walked into a bar, and all said “Death to America”, that would not mean the three of you are suddenly in agreement of what your opposition means.

        Furthermore, even being united in opposition of the same type is still not opposition of the same intensity - both you and a Republican (at least pre-2016) would probably agree that, say, North Korea’s government is tyrannical and needs to be put down. The difference is that the Republican’s opposition to the immediate existence of North Korea’s government would probably be intense enough to sanction unprovoked interstate warfare, whereas your opposition would probably not sanction interstate warfare, instead preferring internal revolution.

        Put another way, a bunch of US presidents have hated Cuba for immensely petty reasons. But only a few have hated it enough to actually attempt to invade.

        “No one is good here”? Yeah, fucking fair. US politics are mega-fucked, and that’s not even getting into the question of how many Americans actually agree with this shite (too many). “They are the same level of horrific”? Not a fucking chance, and no analysis of the situation bears that out that isn’t reliant on alternate history level “But you couldn’t KNOW it wouldn’t happen” about how the discovery of rubber duckies in 100 AD would have made Christianity LGBT-friendly.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Everyone and their grandmother knows a war with Iran would mean Iran closing down the strait of Hormuz, so no one was about to do it. So no Harris wouldn’t have done it JFC. You can say they are an adversary without declaring war JFC. Only Trump is dumb enough to do it.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      JFC Kamala would have done whatever Israel did, which was start this war and drag the US into it.

      JFC liberals believing they would act different.

      • PugJesus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You do realize that Israel has struck Iran numerous times before without the US entering into a full-scale war in support, right?

        • mrdown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The usa was aware of all the assasinations and let it happen. It may not enter the war directly if it was not Trump but they would still fully back israel with intelligence and money and Iran would still retaliate on the usa assets in the middle east and close the straight of Hormuz

          • PugJesus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            The usa was aware of all the assasinations and let it happen.

            Yes, as Israel has done many times before, and as the USA has stood by and allowed many times before.

            It may not enter the war directly

            Okay, so you fucking agree with my point? What’s the issue here?

            if it was not Trump but they would still fully back israel with intelligence and money and Iran would still retaliate on the usa assets in the middle east and close the straight of Hormuz

            Wow, I wonder why they didn’t do that the last dozen fucking times we backed Israel with intelligence and money.

            • mrdown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              48 minutes ago

              Okay, so you fucking agree with my point? What’s the issue here?

              The issue is that ton of Iranians would still get killed if the USA was not directly involved but majority of Americans are simply selfish and may only act when ton of Americans get killed in a war

              Wow, I wonder why they didn’t do that the last dozen fucking times we backed Israel with intelligence and money.

              The preparations for the twelve day war started during Biden and ended during Trump . The reason why this time they went to full scale war is because Israel felt powerful after genociding Gaza with no real consequences from the west and even China and thought they destroyed Hezbollah so they thought they could destroy Iran completely to finally start the greater israel project

              • PugJesus@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                32 minutes ago

                The issue is that ton of Iranians would still get killed if the USA was not directly involved

                Okay, do you think that less Iranians would be killed if the USA was not involved? Would that be something one might consider a significant difference, or are dead Iranians like a boolean - it only matters if there are dead Iranians or there are not; the actual number of lives fucking murdered doesn’t matter?

                but majority of Americans are simply selfish and may only act when ton of Americans get killed in a war

                And act in what way? In what positive way for Iran do you see Americans acting in response to Americans being killed in the war? Direct American involvement in the war stopping? Direct American involvement that would almost certainly not have happened under the other administration?

                The preparations for the twelve day war started during Biden and ended during Trump .

                1. And the October 2024 strikes, and all the ones before that?

                2. That also doesn’t explain why Iran didn’t close the strait then if your point is valid.

                The reason why this time they went to full scale war is because Israel felt powerful after genociding Gaza with no real consequences from the west and even China

                You mean like they felt in 2024? Or in 2025?

                and thought they destroyed Hezbollah so they thought they could destroy Iran completely to finally start the greater israel project

                … that doesn’t explain why Iran would close the strait in response to attacks by Israel alone when it did not do so previously, which is what was asked.

                What power projection do you think Israel has in this war? Without the US directly involved, what level of ‘full scale war’ do you think Israel would be able to wage in 2026, even with a theoretically unlimited amount of monetary and materiel aid from the USA?

  • rklm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t like politicians that support billionaires or holy wars either, but isn’t this ideology partially responsible for the situation we’re in now?

    I understand that voting for someone who is not just the lesser of two evils but also directly opposed to our fundamental values might perpetuate a broken system… but couldn’t there be a way to change the political zeitgeist without killing our own citizens in the streets and threatening to glass a country of millions?

    I want the systems of oppression to fall as much as the next guy, but allowing the Trump administration to concentrate power as fast as possible doesn’t seem like a fair trade to get there.

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The lesser evil keeps leading to the greater evil. It’s no more delusional to demand better, than it is to think that reaffirming the status quo will lead you anywhere but evil.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      but isn’t this ideology partially responsible for the situation we’re in now?

      Welcome to the intent of the propaganda mills creating the easily digested, easily disseminated slop that gets spammed to this community repeatedly and uncritically.

    • lumpenproletariat@quokk.auOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Israel started this war, both sides would follow Israel’s lead.

      To pretend Kamala was different is how you get into this situation.

        • Lemmy World@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Ah yes… I watch people when you hand them something to read physically cringe. Granted I tend to hand people printouts from scientific journals but the idea that having to read something of substance still holds.

  • snoons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    IMO Trump is president because he’s a good puppet. Kamala wouldn’t have been as useful I think.