Without any flashy marketing campaigns or social media fanfare, Valve rolled out a routine Steam Client update containing a very simple line in the patch notes: “Improved Steam Client startup performance.”

  • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Who the fuck cares if the fast launcher is a piece of crap with a fraction of features needed for a good library and storefront?

  • gothmog@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    59 minutes ago

    You know, my while is 3.4x faster to start up and get going than my car but I am not driving to Tampa on my ebike. Actually wouldn’t drive there in the car either. tampa smells like an infected armpit on your grampa Earl.

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Both of them are using a form of embedded Chromium to display the store, no? Is this really worth competing about then? xD

    The Starcraft launcher goes under 1 second on a pentium 1, there.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Why wouldn’t you just set the link to launch the user’s browser, instead of expecting Chromium to implement special case behavior?

        • Charzard4261@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          That is the bug:

          What is the expected result?

          Open the link target in default browser, leaving SSB window on original site, thereby preserving desktop application illusion.

          What happens instead?

          Link opens in current window.

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Tim Sweeny: “Is there anything we are better at than steam? Literally anything? I will take anything we can market, no matter how pathetic and desperate it seems.”

      • Xechon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        In terms of graphical features, sure, probably. In my (admittedly limited) experience Source games tend to have much better performance and modding, which I find much more important.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          Yeah but the performance is mostly due to its age. It’s much more limited in what you can do. BSPs are great for efficiency, but they’re a huge pain to work with when creating a map. Unreal is leagues better to work with in just about every way.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The licensing for source is better than unreal. Its only stipend it has to be published on steam. (Which you’re most likely to do anyway) while unreal requires 5% royalities over 1mil gross revenue (outside of epic store, which lets be real… wont account for much)

          • Dettweiler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            And for that cut they provide hosting, cloud saves, promotion, distribution, community support, workshop availability, DLC handling, and a store page. The cut is also much less than what larger publishing companies charge for less service. Self publishing is very feasible on Steam.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He was recently quoted in an article saying that in order to be successful, games need to launch on the Steam platform.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Recently, Epic Games decided to tackle that reputation head-on by unveiling a preview version of its rebuilt Epic Games Launcher V2, which the company proudly noted was developed with heavy AI assistance. Basically, a decade of working on it themselves, no luck, but they got the AI vibes to help and it did a better job… Not the brag they seem to think it is, but let’s roll with it for now.

    Damn, do you need something for that burn?

  • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As pathetic as Epic is, this is a strong demonstration of why monopolies are bad and competition is needed.

    • Simon_Shitewood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      This isn’t a case of competition though; Valve didn’t slip in a last second speedup to get back at Epic, the patch had already been built and tested and just happened to come out a day after Epic’s did.

    • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m with you on this. I’ve been rather annoyed with watching steam constantly needing to re-download 500 MB of whatever the hell randomly and I run a lot of computers that restart often (benchmarking shitty PCS is kind of a hobby for me).

      I’m glad someone called them out and I’m glad that they responded by improving their software and in record time packing it into the next regular release.

      This whole thing looks like the market acting like it should when there is at least a tiny modicum of competition. Just wish the competition was healthier and more vibrant. And less Epic.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The Steam update has been available in the beta client for over a month. This wasn’t a response, they had already done it.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Huh, I guess competition is good for motivating improvement. Even when you’re competing against the kid that eats paste.

    • Tekdeb@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It didn’t really bother me before, but it has been kind of slow to start for a long time. Bad enough for me to notice that’s it’s slow, but not bad enough to feel the need to complain about it.

      Now it only takes about 6 seconds for me which is perfectly fine. As someone who only runs Steam when I’m about to play a game through it, it’s a very noticeable improvement!

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I let it run constantly and never really noticed the load time. Good to hear it is so quick now!

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      I don’t know but Steam (or any other app) stealing focus was a really big pet peeve of mine. Glad it’s allegedly fixed.

    • Tekdeb@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For you it wouldn’t really matter much. It is a big improvement and very much noticeable, but it matters much more for people like me that only runs Steam when I’m about to play a game through it which can happen several times a day.

      • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        My windows work laptop (company provided it and won’t let me install linux for “safety reasons”; same reasons why they ask me to use chrome instead of firefox, btw): hey, so I know you’re right now working but I just downloaded an update and you know what? I’m restarting now.

    • klankin@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Letting arbitrarily executing code run persistently is a security/privacy risk, for those who care.

      I trust steam more, but I hate that discord does this stuff.

      Also its probably bug territory, but steam always fucking opens big picture if you press the home button any time its running with a controller, even in the background.

      Like I get they probably focused on steam deck UX for their incredibly helpful push to linux, but the dev in me can’t help but be pissed off they implemented it so lazily.

      • fleeg@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You can turn off steam using a certain controller type (or all) but by default it takes them over. It can cause problems with some software, and apparently doesn’t leave controllers in the same state afterwards.

        Works well for me though, the only time I use controllers is for steam games and it handles all the mapping/customization pretty well

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Some people get stuck on performance numbers that don’t matter. Like Linux users that say they want 5second boot time instead of 8. Why? Or a sorts car owner that never does track days but likes to tell you their car can do 240km/h…when we have 120km/h road limits.

      • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        Boot times are such a arbitrary performance statistic. My Nobara machine boots quite fast, but i had to put a 30s timeout for my array of hard drives in the fstab to make sure they get mounted correctly. That’s not the fault of the OS, it’s a hardware limitation that can’t really be worked around at all.

      • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Or a sorts car owner that never does track days but likes to tell you their car can do 240km/h…when we have 120km/h road limits.

        Yeah, but to be fair that V10 Lamborghini Huracán can get up to that speed limit much more quickly than my budget-sports-car Scion tC can. Besides, how are we supposed to know how small their penis is unless they rev their engine up so loud it hurts everyone’s ears?

    • slartibartfast141@piefed.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Public relations, pride, vengeance?

      Companies often take actions which don’t directly improve the product for customers but instead offer benefits to the company. Typing that out in 2026 is… It’s nice that it isn’t pure enshittification for once.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I actually kinda hate that steam is always running.

      I get the reasons why, but I would rather just have like a steam updater daemon than the full app running, and would also prefer that Steam starts quickly unless you catch it during the daemon’s start up.

      The other use case is for HTPC I do not like Big Picture mode as my “home” experience. If you open Steam with game scope it goes into big picture automatically, so it’s designed for Steam Machine experiences and not HTPC. The new screensaver feature (which is in beta, so should improve) uses a lot of GPU and polls CPU frequently, so it’s actually a bit annoying to have running. I would rather use a more native launcher than the Big Picture mode experience, so you end up having to watch the opening animation frequently to mask the slow startup.

      Again, this is pretty mild, and I don’t think even PS5 provides a large improvement.

    • BL4CKP1XX13 [they/it]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      You never boot your computer until you reboot it either, yet if it took 10+ minutes to boot like a PC would many years ago, you’d complain.

      More performance is almost always more better, unless you’re on embedded devices where binary sizes matter, but for us on desktops with comparatively abundant resources, why moan about a free improvement?

      • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It depends if it’s a free improvement or not. If this improved time to open the window at the cost of deferring loading some important functionality it might be a net loss for example

        • BL4CKP1XX13 [they/it]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Thankfully, the only company that I believe has ever made an attempt to make something load faster by making it functionally worse is Microsoft with Windows Fast-Startup.

          “Ah yes, I know how to make their OS load faster… We’ll just never shut it down!” - That’s Microsoft-tier intelligence right there.

          No, I do not believe that Valve would make their storefront worse in any sense just to beat Epic Games; they frankly couldn’t give less of a shit, because they know that the EGL is not competition.

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Boasting about some improvement being vibe coded is such a confusing disconnect for me. There are so many layers of transparent shit that I cannot see through it.

    People dislike epic game launcher for so many reasons. The launch time is something I’ve never considered important.

    The “look how much better we are than X” makes you seem like douchebag. They, don’t seem to grasp it, or they will wouldn’t boast, and that makes it even worse. Then they admit that it was vibe coded. Why? I become immediately suspicious of the change being done carelessly, isn’t properly QA tested, and indicative of a shitty state to begin with. I wasn’t going to install the epic launcher on Linux, but now I’m even less likely to do so.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It might launch in negative time for all I care, but when I scroll down and it takes 30 seconds to load a fucking 128px PNG of the box art… Yeah sorry still useless.

  • accideath@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    8 hours ago

    As much as I dislike Epic, it’s good that they’re at least trying to compete with Valve. Forces them to actually get out patches like that.

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It was only very recently you could even look at your own games library. The ecosystem couldn’t/wouldn’t tell you if you owned a game or not.

        They have zero social integration features and it’s 2026.

        Anybody who defends them is delusional, EPIC are absolute garbage, they are not competing with Valve despite what people keep saying. There is no competition.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t see how the application opening somewhat faster is much of an improvement; they need to go after feature parity if they want to actually compete with Steam.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I hate people that need to act like Epic, or any other competition with Valve, has to be viewed negatively. You can’t even admit that this is an improvement for Steam. What’s wrong with you that makes you feel the need to defend this massive corporation so much?

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You’re confusing me shitting on Epic as defending Valve, I’m not. I am on record stating people are dumb to glaze Gabe so much when he is so rich he owns a yacht maker, not even just a yacht or two. That doesn’t mean Tim Sweeney and Epic aren’t shit. Tim is at the vanguard of pushing an AI first development pipeline so he can go fuck himself. A launcher loading slightly faster isn’t a big deal. Sorry if that opinion upsets you.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                45 minutes ago

                You came out to argue that speeding up the launcher doesn’t matter, against someone who thinks it does. How is that not defending them? Do you just need to take any opportunity to shit on Epic? Is that what it is? If so, that’s fucking weird.

                • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  26 minutes ago

                  I don’t think speeding up the launcher matters much. My argument is speeding up the launcher when EGS is not even close to feature parity isn’t all that great a use of effort. A clown car may be faster than a minivan but the van is still better for everyday use.