• JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This was pretty good.

      "Spoilers" about the Dev's beliefs, sort of

      Okay, so spoiler is the wrong term. But I know a little about DHH. I like that the article doesn’t use that term until the end. It does a good job of explaining why the author believes it is a poor “distro” without having the reader’s opinion of the creator affect it should you know know DHH by DHH.

    • axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s a pretty brutal takedown, made all the better by the fact it’s well written and provides a sound technical analysis.

  • mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    is omarchy a new distro or new window manager?

    I stopped distro hop a while ago, and fixing tiling configs is not worth it anymore for me.

    • axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Neither, it’s apparently a set of not very good bash scripts to configure Arch to use Hyprland and a few apps marketed as a “professional” distro.

  • Redex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I understand that people are frustrated that the distro is getting more attention than it deserves, but to me, the product itself seems fine (apart from the developer’s politics, but if I never tried or used something made by someone I disagree with, I wouldn’t be using Lemmy). I wanted to try Hyprland, I wanted to see how useful it could be and whether I’d like it. Omarchy had a useful template that had everything important predefined and ready to go. I see a lot of people complaining about the pre-installed bloat, but a lot of it is just web apps and it’s extremely easy to remove any of it. As someone who never used Arch or Hyprland, Omarchy was an extremely useful way to get started and to learn how to use it and customise it without having to spend days figuring out how to even get the basics working.

      • jacecomix@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I appreciate the deep dive, but like, I think I’m just a fundamentally different kind of computer user than this person who has an automatic warning on their website telling me to disable all javascript by default.
        I’m not saying they’re wrong, just… more invested in security than I am, among other things probably.

    • GoMati@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Go with whatever you want to go, my friend! People are mad because of the politics rather than the software itself (not going to lie, THERE ARE questionable software choices, but it doesn’t change the fact that most people didn’t even check it)

      • brognak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Dude, the technical issues with this “distro” somehow outweigh even the creators garbage politics and that is actually the only impressive thing about Omarchy.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’s not just your opinion, look at the screensavers. Basically very animated 00’s 8-bit demoscene screens that say “OMARCHY” (cannot be changed withour recompilation) over and over.

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      1 day ago

      From what I gather, the only thing they’ve got going for them is that they’re actually contacting key people to try out the distro, as well as timing that campaign to coincide with the EOL of Win10.

      But yeah, so annoying to see when there’s so many better alternatives by better people out there.

      As for the latter, I haven’t confirmed this myself, but I’ve been hearing that there’s a lot of curling into bash going on, so yeah.

      • someacnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why are the “better people” not advertising as much now? Don’t people understand that advertising is the key to popularity?

        • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Not sure why exactly, but if I had to guess it’s probably a lack of marketing people in the FOSS world in general.

          Recently I’ve only really seen recently the End of 10 campaign from the KDE folks gaining a bit of traction, but even that’s more vaguely pointing in the direction of Linux than anything.

        • digehode@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          I think they mean using curl to grab something and piping the output to bash so it it executed locally.

          And it is pretty common. Things like ohmyzsh use it. I find it scary because you’re running things direct from the web without any package signature architecture. I would trust the omz people but what if their GitHub was compromised? But don’t check any of the source? No. I don’t anyway, but with a bit of fear :/

          • Dima@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Even if you check, you should download with curl and check the downloaded file, then run that, as a malicious server could present a normal download to browsers based on user agent and other fingerprinting data, while presenting a malicious script to curl

            Wish people would stop suggesting the pipe to bash scripts as an install method but the simplicity of being able to tell all Linux and Mac users to just paste a string into their terminal to install and letting the script deal with any differences between systems is probably why we keep seeing it for major projects, rather than a long list of instructions for different distros

    • rozodru@pie.andmc.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      well with the horribly written bash and curl it includes, wouldn’t surprise me at this point.

      • HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And that’s all anyone seems to care about. You don’t hear this shit for all the other assholes in FOSS. Only DHH. It’s embarrassing.

        • Nat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Other FOSS people don’t tend to get loads of money from Cloudflare or all this attention for what’s not even that interesting a project.

          The Ladybird project is also run by someone who’s said some bad things but it hasn’t exploded in popularity or received 6 figures in corporate donations. Something feels off about this Omarchy hype… like, the product isn’t even that amazing, so the only thing I imagine could explain this difference is that it’s DHH doing it.

        • deathbird@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I will see people do this for other FLOSS developers, and I think it’s bad in those cases too. I don’t want to name them because I feel like that’s not worth the effort and frankly we shouldn’t give any attention to complaints about a dev’s personal opinions or character.

          By contrast, I respect the critiques of his actual software, which mostly seem to be fair. I do wonder how much people would even be looking into it if they didn’t have strong opinions about his opinions, but as long as it’s accurate that’s what matters.

        • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Wow, that’s a very thorough review, nice!
          I do hope that these companies start to dig one inch deeper at least before providing grants and stuff, it really is a slap in the face of proper distributions (though I feel like the author’s recommendation of Manjaro is misguided 👀), of course at the end of the day they can give money to whoever the hell they want, but if they want to make good publicity, they’d better make sure they get it right

          • enbiousenvy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            agree on Manjaro. It’s also easy to break in my 6 months experience in 2021. I’m now on Fedora since. Though I think EndeavourOS is a nicer choice for simplified Arch. Or maybe Archlinux itself has gotten easier with archinstall. But I myself have not tinker with distrohopping since I’m on Fedora.

            • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Same here, Fedora, in particular, once atomic, I’m never looking back on my machines.
              Before that I once used Endeavour and can vouch for its reliability

        • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Nice enjoyable little read. Now I kinda know what omarchy is. TL;DR it’s not a distro. It’s a pile of user scripts on Arch, doing things, who knows what.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Bad choices for included software too. I see preinstalled proprietary bloat as a dick move but I could get behind Steam, which is not preinstalled, unlike Discord, Zoom, WhatsApp and Google Drive! Not to mention the AI BS.